HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > SSP: Local Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #481  
Old Posted: Feb 23, 2012, 6:13 AM
Radley77's Avatar
Radley77 Radley77 is online now
The City That Moves
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bridgeland, Calgary
Posts: 1,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by UofC.engineer View Post
I applied for the position of Cycling Coordinator today! We'll see what happens

http://recruiting.calgary.ca/psc/pdh...languageCd=ENG
Good luck man! I think it's a great rewarding position considering such a fine line between what is economically viable, what is politically viable, and what is technically feasible. Plus the rewards of seeing a project through to execution. i.e: Lots of challenges and opportunities!

I just got set up today with a ward 9 email account for Bike Calgary. Bike Calgary is also looking for reps for wards 2-5, 7, 12 and 13. I highly recommend those with an interest in cycling to get involved.
http://bikecalgary.org/node/3086

PS: Anyone with ideas on cycling improvements in ward 9 please feel free to get in touch.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #482  
Old Posted: Feb 23, 2012, 6:44 AM
UofC.engineer's Avatar
UofC.engineer UofC.engineer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 262

Thanks Buddy! There is no chance I'll get it since I recently finished my degree requirements in December and have no engg or media relations experience but I figured why not give it a shot???

What part of ward 9 do u live in? Because I have some bike maps I drew in my spare time up on google earth for the neighborhoods of Fairview, Acadia, Willow Park and Bonavista. Only Fairview and Acadia are in ward 9 though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #483  
Old Posted: Feb 23, 2012, 4:50 PM
kw5150's Avatar
kw5150 kw5150 is offline
Everywhere
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by UofC.engineer View Post
I applied for the position of Cycling Coordinator today! We'll see what happens

http://recruiting.calgary.ca/psc/pdh...languageCd=ENG
Good luck man! Do us well.
__________________
The bow: The "prius" of skyscrapers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #484  
Old Posted: Feb 23, 2012, 11:23 PM
Radley77's Avatar
Radley77 Radley77 is online now
The City That Moves
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bridgeland, Calgary
Posts: 1,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by UofC.engineer View Post

Thanks Buddy! There is no chance I'll get it since I recently finished my degree requirements in December and have no engg or media relations experience but I figured why not give it a shot???

What part of ward 9 do u live in? Because I have some bike maps I drew in my spare time up on google earth for the neighborhoods of Fairview, Acadia, Willow Park and Bonavista. Only Fairview and Acadia are in ward 9 though.
I live in Bridgeland; ward 9 is a complex ward from Dover to Roxboro and Bridgeland to Acadia. I'm definitely interested in any ideas from all the areas in ward 9.

Fairview is interesting; it's close to the Bow River pathway system for recreation, but also Chinook and RockyView Hospital major activity centres. It also has no designated cycling routes and curvilinear street grid. I'm keen on any ideas you may have. I am trying to package up some of these ideas on a ward basis to submit as proposals to the City of Calgary. I have heard many times from the active mode transportation group that they are swamped so there is a need to communicate effectively. I also would like to meet with some of the different community association board members to have them on board with various proposals, gather their input and help expedite the process.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #485  
Old Posted: Feb 24, 2012, 5:33 AM
UofC.engineer's Avatar
UofC.engineer UofC.engineer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 262
This is a route I take when biking to Chinook Station and chinook mall. It's faster than the city's recomended bike route and it uses streets with less auto traffic.

http://maps.google.ca/maps/ms?msid=2...h&z=14&vpsrc=1

I think the city needs to seriously review it's current on street bikeways. There are many bikeways which are impractical to ride on and many routes can be improved by adding adequate signage under the NACTO standards. http://nacto.org/cities-for-cycling/...rkings-system/

Last edited by UofC.engineer; Feb 24, 2012 at 5:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #486  
Old Posted: Feb 24, 2012, 6:51 AM
kw5150's Avatar
kw5150 kw5150 is offline
Everywhere
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,763
Vancouver, (In the neighborhood near 4th st and Arbutus specifically) has a much better pedestrian framework than Calgary IMOOC (in my opinion of course). I found that the drivers were happy with it and so were the pedestrians.

There seemed to be one crossing at almost every block, and the lights seemed quicker than ours (cant remember exactly from 2003). When a pedestrian hit the button to cross, the vehicles stopping for the pedestrians, left plenty of room for motorists to cross as well (from the side streets).

I think the roads in the Arbutus area were slightly more narrow than the roads you see in Calgary's beltline (with exception the 17th of course), but everything just ran smoothly anyway. The density of people, trees, planters and other things also seemed to make general tasks more tolerable for everyone.

Do we need more signalled crossings? Slightly narrower roads? Slightly wider sidewalks?? Something is just a bit off in Calgary compared to Vancouver, especially with the main retail streets.

I really cant wait to watch Calgary shed its former self and become something new. We have a lot to learn from other successful cities.

All in all though, there is something great I love about Calgary. The Brits cant get enough of this place.
__________________
The bow: The "prius" of skyscrapers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #487  
Old Posted: Mar 5, 2012, 4:37 PM
Radley77's Avatar
Radley77 Radley77 is online now
The City That Moves
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bridgeland, Calgary
Posts: 1,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by UofC.engineer View Post
This is a route I take when biking to Chinook Station and chinook mall. It's faster than the city's recomended bike route and it uses streets with less auto traffic.

http://maps.google.ca/maps/ms?msid=2...h&z=14&vpsrc=1

I think the city needs to seriously review it's current on street bikeways. There are many bikeways which are impractical to ride on and many routes can be improved by adding adequate signage under the NACTO standards. http://nacto.org/cities-for-cycling/...rkings-system/
Hi, interesting idea. Do you think Fairmount Dr SE could have barrier protected bike lanes instead of your proposed idea of sidewalk upgrade to multi use pathway? IMO, Fairmount Dr SE (or alternative) should continue north from the preexisting bike lane that ends at Heritage. I avoid sidewalk usage wherever possible since I perceive it as a higher safety risk than riding responsibly on the road.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #488  
Old Posted: Apr 27, 2012, 1:50 AM
UofC.engineer's Avatar
UofC.engineer UofC.engineer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 262
Looks like the city will finally connect the 9th ave bike lanes to inglewood this year.


http://www.calgary.ca/Transportation...ontext-map.pdf

http://www.calgary.ca/_layouts/cocis...f&noredirect=1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #489  
Old Posted: Apr 30, 2012, 6:03 AM
Tropics Tropics is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 568
The west LRT bike routes are having an information session at Westbrook Mall on May 2nd, from 2-4 according to a billboard on 32nd street, 4-8 according to the city website.

I was looking over some of the plans and am not at all impressed with what they are doing and the results of the decisions they are making if they carry through with them will be nothing more then a huge reduction in the number of people encouraged to cycle in this city as a form of transportation due to safety concerns and a lack of ease when cycling along with making driving on the some of these streets a gigantic pain as well.

This is what Copenhagen, a city with alot of cyclists has done to add safety for cyclists and not interfere with automobile traffic.

from bikepaths.com.au

Vancouver, Melbourne, and other cities are spending alot of money converting their bikeroutes along city streets to a similar fashion as seen below.

from straight.com

Calgary should take note that these cities are spending money converting to this, and not create dated bike routes along roads that other cities are now moving away from. Instead Calgary is proposing things like this.

from the City of Calgary west LRT bike route proposal

City of Calgary

City of Calgary

What cities around the world have realized is that you do NOT put bike routes on the same lane as cars. Bikes tend not to travel as fast as cars and when cars pass bikes accidents can take place that are not the fault of either party and are more the result of two vehicles that should NOT be sharing the same lane. Nor do you put the bike route BESIDE the traffic between the parked cars and the moving cars. When a car parks and a driver opens their door where is that door going? Into the bike lane. Now the biker has the quick reflexes to stop his bike in order not to hit the door, or worse they swerve into the automobile lane and get hit by a car. By putting the bike lane on the inside of the parked cars the drivers side door does not open into the bike lane and as above a small barrier can make it such that the passenger side door does not either. Even if the passenger side door DID open to impeed the bike their swerving does not now take them into 3000 pound+ vehicles that are traveling 50KM an hour.

This is what you do, and clearly the city is aware that the idea does exist.

City of Calgary

That is what you do for the WHOLE route on roads when you "have" to put a bike route on a roadway. If there is not room on a particular road then you remove a parking lane to fit it, if you cannot do that on a particular road then you do NOT build a bike route on that exact road at all and find another nearby road that goes in the same direction that you can do it on.

The places where they put the parked cars on the curb and the bike lane on the traffic side make NO SENSE, it would take virtually no more room to switch the parked car lane and the bike lane so that the parked cars no form a barrier between bike traffic and bikes and bikers no longer need to fee the nerves of getting "squeezed" between a moving and parked car by a driver who moves too close.

Those lanes on the outside of the parked cars and the lanes that actually share the road with the cars are the worst implementation of a proper bike route system imaginable. Many cities already have what the City of Calgary is proposing and they are actively spending infrastructure money to move AWAY from that. We should do it right in the first place and do what those cities are now moving towards.

If they do an actual proper system there is actually a very likely positive benefit in the number of people who commute by bike. Many cities who have implemented proper bike routes such as Copenhagen and what Vancouver are moving towards see HUGE increases in the number of people who commute by bicycle. If they mess this up and make biking unattractive and dangerous seeming doing what the other cities had and moved away from "BEFORE" they saw those huge increases then obviously bicycle commuting in Calgary will be lower then what it could be.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #490  
Old Posted: Apr 30, 2012, 6:16 AM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is online now
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,225

city of calgary

lol, yeah right.


I'm with you, I don't understand why if bike lanes are put on the side of a street with has both parking and driving, you would put the lane in between the two so that a) as you said, swerve to avoid a door and boom, hit by a vehicle. or b) cars entering or leaving the parking curb lane have to cross bike lanes.


Like instead of this:


city of calgary

Why not this?



Actually I suppose one reasoning is that people then have to walk across bike lanes to get the sidewalk after parking. I see there are green crosswalk patches in the Copenhagen pic though.
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Development Watch - Forums
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #491  
Old Posted: Apr 30, 2012, 6:31 AM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is online now
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,225
By the way, I can't wait for the bike paths to be connected between the EV and Inglewood. I've been walking home lately down 9th ave and there's more cyclists on the sidewalk than pedestrians. On friday one didn't even slow down as he squeezed between me and a telephone poll, missing me by about 2 inches. Eventually I started just walking on the grass to avoid them. Then Saturday, I was walking north on 10th street where there are dedicated bike lanes on the street, and had 2 bikes on the lane, and another on the sidewalk at the same time. Stupid.
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Development Watch - Forums
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #492  
Old Posted: Apr 30, 2012, 3:01 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is online now
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,245
Tropics and Dizzy- you guys are completely right. There is no reason why the bike lanes are not in the curb lane, switched with parking. This is ridiculous. I encourage you guys not only to provide feedback directly to the city, but to contact groups such as Bike Calgary, and see if you can get a coordinated response. This is going backwards.
__________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #493  
Old Posted: Apr 30, 2012, 3:39 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is online now
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,245
This is what I think should be done for SW Calgary in terms of bike lanes:

Create east/west on-street lanes (as described above) on the following streets:

- 21st Avenue (build a bicycle bridge across Crowchild to connect 21st avenue and 20th avenue- but make it a proper bicycle bridge- i.e. have a straight ramp on each side).
- 26th Avenue (turn the existing bike lane into a separated lane with a curb). Also connect it into Prospect avenue via 14a street and 24th avenue and a bike bridge or signalized crossing across 14th. in Mount Royal so then it could connect to either 11th Street or 8th street through the Beltline

Create north/south on-street lanes on the following streets:

- 20th Street
- 26th street (connects to river pathway)
- 29th street (connects south to MRU)
- 33rd street (connects to river pathway via Sarcee road)
__________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #494  
Old Posted: Apr 30, 2012, 7:11 PM
Tropics Tropics is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 568
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
Tropics and Dizzy- you guys are completely right. There is no reason why the bike lanes are not in the curb lane, switched with parking. This is ridiculous. I encourage you guys not only to provide feedback directly to the city, but to contact groups such as Bike Calgary, and see if you can get a coordinated response. This is going backwards.
I am going to go to that meeting and I will address the comments on this thread, the comments on forums where the properly set up bike lanes have been implemented and where the bicyclists have seen it as a resounding positive and the percentage of people using bikes went up dramatically.

I will see if I can contact that "Bike Calgary" thing, are they a city thing or a public group?

With enough negative feedback on the nature of these bike routes and the constructive discussion of the alternative curb side bike routes being implemented by other cities I am pretty sure they would rework this whole proposal, and that would be better for everyone in this city whether they bike or not, as well as being better for the city itself as it shows it is at the cutting edge of forward thinking with this type of thing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #495  
Old Posted: May 1, 2012, 5:52 AM
MasterG MasterG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 306
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tropics View Post
I am going to go to that meeting and I will address the comments on this thread, the comments on forums where the properly set up bike lanes have been implemented and where the bicyclists have seen it as a resounding positive and the percentage of people using bikes went up dramatically.

I will see if I can contact that "Bike Calgary" thing, are they a city thing or a public group?

With enough negative feedback on the nature of these bike routes and the constructive discussion of the alternative curb side bike routes being implemented by other cities I am pretty sure they would rework this whole proposal, and that would be better for everyone in this city whether they bike or not, as well as being better for the city itself as it shows it is at the cutting edge of forward thinking with this type of thing.
As for the 13th Ave proposal, the reason it was chosen for shared access like that was due to the very limited car traffic along 13th. Bike Calgary is an advocacy group, not directly linked to the city I believe, however they are often consulted with and bring attention to issues. I would try to contact Calgary Pathway Advisory Council (CPAC) to voice your concerns, they are advocacy group created by the city to represent the users of pathways and on-street bikeways, they may have a better idea on how to most effectively voice your concerns.

If you are serious about seeing a change to the plans however, advocacy groups are not as effective as the political avenues. Send a letter to the alderman.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #496  
Old Posted: May 1, 2012, 2:38 PM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is online now
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,225
I notice this site/document: http://nacto.org/cities-for-cycling/...al-bike-lanes/

indicates that bike lanes are to be between traffic and parking lanes, as well Wikipedia mentions "According to the Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, on-road bicycle lanes should always be located between the parking lane and the travel lane.[1]" although interestingly enough that [1] reference http://www.bicyclinginfo.org/enginee...-widelanes.cfm doesn't actually seem to say that.
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Development Watch - Forums
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #497  
Old Posted: May 8, 2012, 8:53 PM
kw5150's Avatar
kw5150 kw5150 is offline
Everywhere
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,763
Pedestrians

Was out for a site meeting today on my bike and took the pathways. Astounding how many people are using the area around the peace bridge, eau claire, barclay mall, courts park, Stephen ave, Memorial Park......and the list goes on and on. Does anyone even use their car at lunch in this city?? What a great experience. All of the pedestrian infrastructure build over the last 30 years in REALLY paying off.

Some images.


By kw5150 at 2012-05-08


By kw5150 at 2012-05-08


By kw5150 at 2012-05-08


By kw5150 at 2012-05-08


By kw5150 at 2012-05-08


By kw5150 at 2012-05-08


By kw5150 at 2012-05-08


By kw5150 at 2012-05-08


By kw5150 at 2012-05-08


By kw5150 at 2012-05-08


By kw5150 at 2012-05-08


By kw5150 at 2012-05-08
__________________
The bow: The "prius" of skyscrapers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #498  
Old Posted: May 8, 2012, 10:26 PM
hulkrogan hulkrogan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 372
Great shots! I can't wait to see what the bridge traffic looks like during Stampede. Some photos that week could make a great counter point to everyone saying a bridge doesn't attract tourists.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #499  
Old Posted: May 8, 2012, 10:40 PM
polishavenger polishavenger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,286
the asphalt pathways around the bridge look ghetto, need upgrading to similar standard as the main path.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #500  
Old Posted: May 9, 2012, 4:07 PM
kw5150's Avatar
kw5150 kw5150 is offline
Everywhere
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by polishavenger View Post
the asphalt pathways around the bridge look ghetto, need upgrading to similar standard as the main path.
The design for the Peace Bridge landscape is inspired by a "River Delta". It has paths that radiate out in many directions from the peace bridge and connect to every possible pathway in the area. At first I wasn't sure about the design (because I think it should be a large plaza space similar to riverwalk instead of a whole bunch of pathways), but it has grown on me a bit. I hope the firm modifies their design a bit to allow for more of a gathering space.
__________________
The bow: The "prius" of skyscrapers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > SSP: Local Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:42 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.