HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction

    

432 Park Avenue in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram
New York Projects & Construction Forum
            
View Full Map

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1961  
Old Posted: Jul 31, 2012, 3:32 AM
KevininPhx KevininPhx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewYorkDominates View Post


I'm pretty sure this hasn't been posted here so I decided to post it.I don't know to whom it belongs though.
Ooh, I'm seriously in love with this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1962  
Old Posted: Jul 31, 2012, 3:42 AM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
@TechTalkGuy (Twitter)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,120
I'd love to see the views from the observatory atop Rockefeller Plaza and Empire State Building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1963  
Old Posted: Jul 31, 2012, 4:13 AM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is offline
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Millvale, Pittsburgh
Posts: 6,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrancoRey View Post
One thing I'm curious to see if they've deeply researched is the affects of high winds on this building, as well as potential earthquakes. I know it's probably all been covered but it's something that I can't just shake off being worried about given how small a footprint this thing has. It's just so damn skinny! I would bet this structure has the highest height:width ratio of any building on the planet, save maybe clock towers, spires and the like. I can't think of anything else that is so slim!
They wouldnt spend hundreds of millions or however much this building will cost to get built just to have it topple over in a hurricane. I can assure you that it will be completely safe and NYC doesnt have earthquakes, at least not large ones as theres no large active seismic zones or faulting going on. Although, Im sure theyve accounted for the worst case scenario.
__________________
My fine art photography website : http://fineartamerica.com/profiles/c...itherland.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1964  
Old Posted: Jul 31, 2012, 7:59 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: AUSTIN
Posts: 33,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrancoRey View Post
One thing I'm curious to see if they've deeply researched is the affects of high winds on this building, as well as potential earthquakes. I know it's probably all been covered but it's something that I can't just shake off being worried about given how small a footprint this thing has. It's just so damn skinny! I would bet this structure has the highest height:width ratio of any building on the planet, save maybe clock towers, spires and the like. I can't think of anything else that is so slim!
I was wondering what the width would be and googled it. Naturally this website came up with a post Zapatan made while ago:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
it's about 14.5 to 1, don't know where you got the 21 figure.

93.5 feet wide and 1398 feet tall = about 14.5 to 1 ratio
I was curious myself about the size. I measured the property which is roughly 276 feet long along East 56th Street. The portion of the property facing Park Avenue is a whopping 60 feet wide, and the "deepest" line running into the property from East 56th Street is about 100 feet. I was thinking the tower would be much skinnier than those numbers, maybe half the depth of the property at around 50 feet. I wonder where Zapatan got that 93 foot number from? Zapatan?

I'd like to build a model of this thing just as a gag and plop into it my Austin model.
__________________
Facebook
I like the Raleighs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1965  
Old Posted: Jul 31, 2012, 8:01 AM
sterlippo1 sterlippo1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: North of Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrancoRey View Post
One thing I'm curious to see if they've deeply researched is the affects of high winds on this building, as well as potential earthquakes. I know it's probably all been covered but it's something that I can't just shake off being worried about given how small a footprint this thing has. It's just so damn skinny! I would bet this structure has the highest height:width ratio of any building on the planet, save maybe clock towers, spires and the like. I can't think of anything else that is so slim!
i'm pretty sure they have everything covered
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1966  
Old Posted: Jul 31, 2012, 11:42 AM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
@TechTalkGuy (Twitter)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas View Post
I'd like to build a model of this thing just as a gag and plop into it my Austin model.
I'd like a model of every major skyscraper ever built.
Right now, I only have a limited amount of models.
The tallest model skyscraper sitting on the floor of my living room is the Empire State Building (and it is quite tall).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1967  
Old Posted: Jul 31, 2012, 4:21 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 2,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas View Post
I was wondering what the width would be and googled it. Naturally this website came up with a post Zapatan made while ago:



I was curious myself about the size. I measured the property which is roughly 276 feet long along East 56th Street. The portion of the property facing Park Avenue is a whopping 60 feet wide, and the "deepest" line running into the property from East 56th Street is about 100 feet. I was thinking the tower would be much skinnier than those numbers, maybe half the depth of the property at around 50 feet. I wonder where Zapatan got that 93 foot number from? Zapatan?

I'd like to build a model of this thing just as a gag and plop into it my Austin model.
The portion of the site fronting Park Ave is narrow, but is irrelevant because the tower is not located there.

The portion of the site where the tower is located runs the entire width of the block from 56th to 57th street- ~200ft. That part is also the width of 5 townhouses, which comes out to ~100ft. Plenty of room for a 93ft square tower.

Quote:
Originally Posted by scalziand View Post
The part of the hole where the tower will rise is 5 townhouses wide making it 100'

It's all in the nydob filings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1968  
Old Posted: Jul 31, 2012, 5:59 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is online now
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 25,188
The dimensions of the tower are given on the drawings...











Cam shot from today...almost getting there.



www.432park.com
__________________
Love NEW YORK?

Visit New York's icon. See the City of shores. Walk the Streets of Manhattan.
The evolving skyline, NY Skyscrapers & Construction
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1969  
Old Posted: Jul 31, 2012, 7:50 PM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
@TechTalkGuy (Twitter)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
The dimensions of the tower are given on the drawings...

www.432park.com
That explains everything right there!
You can clearly get an overview of the size, dimensions and location proximity to the entire square block in that diagram.

Thanks NYguy !!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1970  
Old Posted: Jul 31, 2012, 10:22 PM
Duck From NY Duck From NY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Staten Island, "New York City"
Posts: 547
I continue to be further converted in to a fan of this building. Great spot for it! So glad the Eastern portion of Midtown will be getting super-talls to balance out the inevitable boom on the West side.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1971  
Old Posted: Jul 31, 2012, 11:10 PM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
@TechTalkGuy (Twitter)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,120
Keep in mind that there are plenty of opportunities along the West Side.

Personally, I am pleased to know that Park Avenue will be hosting a Super Tall with 432 Park Avenue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1972  
Old Posted: Aug 1, 2012, 1:28 AM
chris123678's Avatar
chris123678 chris123678 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 454
How long before it reaches street level?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1973  
Old Posted: Aug 1, 2012, 1:49 AM
Silverfox's Avatar
Silverfox Silverfox is offline
Gigatall Skyscraper
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 87
The cladding in those renderings is beautiful. The great thing to know is that it'll most likely look even better than that in real life, as most buildings usually do.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1974  
Old Posted: Aug 1, 2012, 2:23 AM
bigreach's Avatar
bigreach bigreach is offline
SWFC and ICC R Best
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by scalziand View Post
The portion of the site fronting Park Ave is narrow, but is irrelevant because the tower is not located there.

The portion of the site where the tower is located runs the entire width of the block from 56th to 57th street- ~200ft. That part is also the width of 5 townhouses, which comes out to ~100ft. Plenty of room for a 93ft square tower.



It's all in the nydob filings.
Hey Scalziand, think any possibility it can reach strret level by sept?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1975  
Old Posted: Aug 1, 2012, 2:41 AM
fastdupree fastdupree is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 36
I am going to LOVE this skyscraper just for the roof height factor alone. Imagine standing on the corner in Manhattan and just looking up at this baby. "Wow!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1976  
Old Posted: Aug 1, 2012, 3:05 AM
ThatOneGuy's Avatar
ThatOneGuy ThatOneGuy is offline
User that is Registered
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Constanta
Posts: 644
^^ The thinness and simplicity of the design will add to the soaring effect, making it look much taller!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1977  
Old Posted: Aug 1, 2012, 12:51 PM
tubeworm tubeworm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Danbury, CT (Greater NYC)
Posts: 49
Concerning the old Drake Hotel:

I was watching some TV and I came across a commercial advertising a new show called 666 Park Avenue. After I got an outside glimpse of the place, it looked more and more like the old Drake Hotel! Are they doing something in remembrance of the old Drake? It might be fun to watch... ¯\(°_o)/¯
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1978  
Old Posted: Aug 1, 2012, 1:09 PM
yankeesfan1000 yankeesfan1000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 10014
Posts: 1,055
666 Park is between 66th and 67th, about ten blocks north of the old Drake. There is no connection between the timing of the show and the demo of the old hotel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1979  
Old Posted: Aug 1, 2012, 1:18 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is online now
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 25,188
Morning cam shot...(Aug 1, 2012)



www.432park.com
__________________
Love NEW YORK?

Visit New York's icon. See the City of shores. Walk the Streets of Manhattan.
The evolving skyline, NY Skyscrapers & Construction
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1980  
Old Posted: Aug 1, 2012, 3:51 PM
MrSlippery519 MrSlippery519 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 361
Lots of work going on this morning...they are finishing up the last few perimeter sections. I would imagine by mid to late next week the ramp will be gone and will then start to see it rising. There is not much room left to maneuver
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:30 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.