HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted: Jul 27, 2010, 9:54 PM
ATXboom ATXboom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,132
I love the density in the images.... hopefully that can be achieved.

This is the start of modern node based density... I wouldn't call this sprawl. To get cars off the freeway we need dense centers of live/work/play distributed... Of course the biggest center should be in the core of Austin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted: Jul 28, 2010, 2:18 AM
Scott Wood Scott Wood is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATXboom View Post
I love the density in the images.... hopefully that can be achieved.

This is the start of modern node based density... I wouldn't call this sprawl.
Parts of it look nice (especially the first image), and it's certainly better than rolling out another patch of single-family lots with pod-style gated apartment complexes splotched here and there.

But other parts still seem a little on the sprawly side - corporate campuses, large surface parking lots, etc.

Most of the office space is on the periphery, not in the core. Will people be driving between those offices and the core (or worse, off-development), to get lunch? Is there enough retail/restaurant to serve this much residential/office (I suppose it depends on how efficiently it's used -- is it a few large tenants, or a diverse mix of many small ones?), or will people be frequently leaving for services elsewhere?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATXboom View Post
To get cars off the freeway we need dense centers of live/work/play distributed... Of course the biggest center should be in the core of Austin.
I can see the desire for other density sites besides the central city, given how sprawled the existing settlement is (which won't be abandoned any time soon), and the relative lack of NIMBYs with greenfield development -- but there ought to be some sort of transportation plan, or else you'll still be dumping people on the freeway (or arterials) to get between density centers.

I suppose an express bus could run to/from downtown along 35, and possibly the 201 bus could be extended down Old San Antonio Road or 35 to provide some limited connectivity with South Austin, but I saw no mention of transportation in the article or the linked plan document at all (but plenty of images of/references to Austin proper; they're not exactly pitching this as an independent village).

Will this site even be part of the Capital Metro service area? According to http://www.capmetro.org/gismaps/ada/cmsa.html, the service area runs down the freeway, but not over the adjacent land, apparently following city limits that do the same. Would Austin be annexing the land?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted: Jun 28, 2012, 7:58 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: AUSTIN
Posts: 33,454
This project is still kickin'.

http://www.statesman.com/business/re...r-2405582.html
Quote:
Austin City Council to hear plans for four proposed mixed-use developments

By Shonda Novak

Published: 10:23 p.m. Wednesday, June 27, 2012

The Austin City Council is scheduled to be briefed today on four planned projects whose developers are seeking a special type of zoning to allow greater flexibility in development regulations in exchange for providing public benefits.

Estancia Hill Country: 594 acres near Interstate 35 and FM 1327 in southern Travis County, where Stratford Land, a Dallas-based land investment fund, envisions 737 single-family homes; 1,550 apartments; 905,000 square feet of office space, including a corporate office campus; 402,000 square feet of retail/commercial uses; and 112 acres of parks and open space.
__________________
Facebook
I like the Raleighs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted: Jun 28, 2012, 8:03 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas View Post
Notice all but one are in close proximity to The Circuit of the Americas. The development boom for that area of the county is about to begin.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted: Jun 29, 2012, 1:31 AM
nixcity's Avatar
nixcity nixcity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Austin, TX.
Posts: 475
I love the look of Estancia, I hope it gets built out to that scale. It would be like the domain of the soutside without the plastic mall feel to it
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted: Jun 29, 2012, 5:18 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by nixcity View Post
I love the look of Estancia, I hope it gets built out to that scale. It would be like the domain of the soutside without the plastic mall feel to it
Dont forget the area at I35 and SH 45 is planned to be a regional center so expect some density in that area.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted: Jun 29, 2012, 5:46 PM
Hill Country's Avatar
Hill Country Hill Country is offline
I hate you.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: At the bottom of the spiral
Posts: 1,048
Did the council approve this and the other three big developments up for a vote yesterday? The airport terminal vote got all the attention.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted: Jun 30, 2012, 1:59 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: AUSTIN
Posts: 33,454
I just hope they do a better job with those lowrise office buildings. Please, no office parks. They should be up against those midrise residential buildings. Public transit connectivity is also a must, not a Southpark Medows Part 2 with acres of hot parking lots.
__________________
Facebook
I like the Raleighs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted: Jun 30, 2012, 5:45 PM
SecretAgentMan's Avatar
SecretAgentMan SecretAgentMan is offline
CIA since 2003
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hill Country View Post
Did the council approve this and the other three big developments up for a vote yesterday? The airport terminal vote got all the attention.
No approvals, they were just briefings that begin the approval process. The briefings were held at 3:45 am and lasted all of four minutes.

http://austintx.swagit.com/play/06282012-529

Items 132 - 135
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:53 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.