HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise Construction

    

Lincoln Park 2520 in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum
            
View Full Map

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #341  
Old Posted: May 1, 2012, 3:27 AM
ChiPhi's Avatar
ChiPhi ChiPhi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago, Philadelphia
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by markh9 View Post
Burn the heretic!!!
I know. I never thought I would advocate for a tower being shorter, but that seems to be my complaint with many of LaGrange's historicist (especially the beaux-arts ones like this, 840 N LSD, 10 East Delaware). One need only look at how well the height-appropriate 65 E Goethe turned out (as a side-note, the detailing on that building turned out quite nice as well - usually the greatest failure of a LaGrange design; it also has real stone instead of precast if I'm not mistaken). I'd bet the height was a result of NIMBYs trying to keep the "neighborhood character" intact. In this one case (if it was NIMBYs that are responsible), I commend them. Wow, I really am quite the heretic. I suppose I'll get that bonfire ready myself and you guys can just tie me up...
__________________
“The test of a great building is in the marketplace. The Marketplace recognizes the value of quality architecture and endorses it in the sales price it is able to achieve.” — Jon Pickard, Principal, Pickard Chilton
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #342  
Old Posted: May 1, 2012, 2:36 PM
woodrow woodrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 404
^^you are right about 65 E. Goethe - limestone not precast. Also, the windows? Mahogany. Zinc roof, and I believe the wrought iron is truly that. Not cast and not aluminum.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #343  
Old Posted: May 1, 2012, 3:15 PM
ChiPhi's Avatar
ChiPhi ChiPhi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago, Philadelphia
Posts: 500
Maybe the problem with LaGrange is the budget he gets. If he got the budget of RAMSA buildings he would be able to provide products like RAMSA... I doubt it
__________________
“The test of a great building is in the marketplace. The Marketplace recognizes the value of quality architecture and endorses it in the sales price it is able to achieve.” — Jon Pickard, Principal, Pickard Chilton
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #344  
Old Posted: May 1, 2012, 4:58 PM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,543
^^^ Well to me he's got major massing and cohesiveness issues. Only LP 2025 has decent massing IMO out of all his highrise projects.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #345  
Old Posted: May 19, 2012, 12:46 AM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
prism
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,946
__________________
flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #346  
Old Posted: May 19, 2012, 1:55 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
insouciant
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: unconventionally bicoastal
Posts: 8,477
With this and Ritz-Carlton wrapping up, there will soon be no Lagrange projects under construction anywhere in the city. Unless I'm mistaken, there have been no new proposals either.

There are a few old proposals, but none of them seem particularly likely to be revived (X/O, Union Station tower, Catalyst).
__________________
The joy and stimulus in architecture is the discovery of fresh combinations of old ingredients appropriate to present problems. I’d rather be right than contemporary. - Harry Weese
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #347  
Old Posted: May 19, 2012, 2:05 AM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
prism
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,946
400 West Randolph is still active.

It may be redesigned, but here's the current version:
__________________
flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #348  
Old Posted: May 19, 2012, 3:20 AM
Andrew|W Andrew|W is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by i_am_hydrogen View Post
400 West Randolph is still active.

It may be redesigned, but here's the current version:
That was me, a couple weeks ago on the 444 West Lake Thread. It's interesting how information goes full circle. I'm pretty sure that LaGrange has nothing to do with this project as Goettsch is now pretty far along in the conceptual design process.

For some reason either our marketing department or the developer's hasn't publicized anything concrete on the design of this building yet (even a couple of us in the office wondered why it wasn't in Crain's rendering reveal last week). But I would hate to be the one to accidentally give away information that is not ready for the public. I will tell you though that if you are searching for news on this project it is most likely going to be re-branded as part of North Riverside Plaza rather than by its Randolph St. Address.

Also, while the redesign looks nothing like the rendering posted above, the massing/site plan are still mostly the same, with the tower in the northeast corner, a 2-3 story parking/amenities/cafeteria podium with roof-top park along the west side and a semi-enclosed plaza open to the river and Randolph St. on in the southeast corner.


Back on topic: blipsman, have you had a chance to get a photo of the crown on 2520 lately? I've been squinting at the completed mansard roof from the ground and I'm curious to see how the details hold up-close (or not hold as often is the case with LaGrange). I particularly thing the matched light grey windows in a light grey roof was a bit of an odd choice, but maybe it will grow on me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #349  
Old Posted: May 19, 2012, 1:01 PM
ChiPhi's Avatar
ChiPhi ChiPhi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago, Philadelphia
Posts: 500
I came down LSD last night on my way home from a concert at Lincoln Hall. The massing looks okay enough that this building looks pretty good when all you can see is the silhouette. I thought about taking a picture, but didn't have a camera on me. The whole effect is ruined, though, because there are these red lights that flash incessantly on the rooftop. I assume they were there because of some zoning purpose? Anyone know why this particular building needed them?
__________________
“The test of a great building is in the marketplace. The Marketplace recognizes the value of quality architecture and endorses it in the sales price it is able to achieve.” — Jon Pickard, Principal, Pickard Chilton
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #350  
Old Posted: May 19, 2012, 4:19 PM
BraveNewWorld's Avatar
BraveNewWorld BraveNewWorld is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew|W View Post
That was me, a couple weeks ago on the 444 West Lake Thread. It's interesting how information goes full circle. I'm pretty sure that LaGrange has nothing to do with this project as Goettsch is now pretty far along in the conceptual design process.

For some reason either our marketing department or the developer's hasn't publicized anything concrete on the design of this building yet (even a couple of us in the office wondered why it wasn't in Crain's rendering reveal last week). But I would hate to be the one to accidentally give away information that is not ready for the public. I will tell you though that if you are searching for news on this project it is most likely going to be re-branded as part of North Riverside Plaza rather than by its Randolph St. Address.

Also, while the redesign looks nothing like the rendering posted above, the massing/site plan are still mostly the same, with the tower in the northeast corner, a 2-3 story parking/amenities/cafeteria podium with roof-top park along the west side and a semi-enclosed plaza open to the river and Randolph St. on in the southeast corner.


Back on topic: blipsman, have you had a chance to get a photo of the crown on 2520 lately? I've been squinting at the completed mansard roof from the ground and I'm curious to see how the details hold up-close (or not hold as often is the case with LaGrange). I particularly thing the matched light grey windows in a light grey roof was a bit of an odd choice, but maybe it will grow on me.
what redesign ? Can we get pics of the redesign ? Also, do you know when they will release info to the public ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #351  
Old Posted: May 19, 2012, 6:57 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
insouciant
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: unconventionally bicoastal
Posts: 8,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by i_am_hydrogen View Post
400 West Randolph is still active.

It may be redesigned, but here's the current version:
This design is Ricardo Bofill, not Lagrange. (I'll take Bofill any day.)
__________________
The joy and stimulus in architecture is the discovery of fresh combinations of old ingredients appropriate to present problems. I’d rather be right than contemporary. - Harry Weese
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #352  
Old Posted: May 20, 2012, 7:02 PM
Hayward's Avatar
Hayward Hayward is offline
The land of beige precast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,536
I had no idea there was ever a design for that site. Hopefully there will be a redesign. Can we have at least one tower over that's not all glass?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #353  
Old Posted: May 22, 2012, 4:46 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
With this and Ritz-Carlton wrapping up, there will soon be no Lagrange projects under construction anywhere in the city. Unless I'm mistaken, there have been no new proposals either.

There are a few old proposals, but none of them seem particularly likely to be revived (X/O, Union Station tower, Catalyst).
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I think VOA-Lagrange have split up (VOA has scrubbed its website clean of LL projects) and he's back to his old firm. Probably in part because Lagrange seems to be getting new work in NY and Chicago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #354  
Old Posted: May 27, 2012, 11:22 PM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,359
*crowd in stunned silence for five days*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #355  
Old Posted: May 27, 2012, 11:41 PM
Chicago_Forever's Avatar
Chicago_Forever Chicago_Forever is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chi-River North
Posts: 239
He's like those weeds in the crack of your sidewalk that never dies no matter how much you spray them with herbicide. lol
I think you guys will get a real kick out of this article.


Lagrange rebuilds a career

For the second time in less than a year, architect Lucien Lagrange is on the move.

Earlier this month, he left VOA Associates Inc., where he had worked since last summer, to join the Chicago office of Dallas-based HKS Inc. as chief of design for HKS Lucien Lagrange Studio.

The move represents a significant reversal of fortune for the 71-year-old Mr. Lagrange, who rose to fame during the boom years with a series of high-profile commissions but lately has endured some humbling setbacks.


Read more: http://www.chicagobusiness.com/artic...#ixzz1w7Kihjnh
Stay on top of Chicago business with our free daily e-newsletters
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #356  
Old Posted: May 28, 2012, 12:30 AM
Kippis's Avatar
Kippis Kippis is offline
Chicagoland Runaway
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago_Forever View Post
He's like those weeds in the crack of your sidewalk that never dies no matter how much you spray them with herbicide. lol

I think you guys will get a real kick out of this article.

http://www.chicagobusiness.com/artic...#ixzz1w7Kihjnh
Stay on top of Chicago business with our free daily e-newsletters
My favorite quote:

“I think they were scared to deal with me. I've got 50 years of experience and have done 20 major buildings in downtown Chicago. They thought I was going to take over and push people out.”

Now now Lucien, don't be modest. Honestly, if anything has changed about his disposition in the last year, it's that he's become even MORE conceited. lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #357  
Old Posted: May 28, 2012, 2:57 AM
Andrew|W Andrew|W is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kippis View Post
My favorite quote:

Now now Lucien, don't be modest. Honestly, if anything has changed about his disposition in the last year, it's that he's become even MORE conceited. lol
He allegedly walked out of the Chicago Building Congress banquet a couple of weeks ago without accepting his finalist award because his JW Marriott renovation didn't win in its category. So yeah, he seems to think that he is all that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #358  
Old Posted: May 28, 2012, 4:34 AM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
prism
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,946
I live a few blocks away, and I'm really surprised at how well this building meets the street. The massing is terrible, but it looks great at street level. Very elegant.
__________________
flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #359  
Old Posted: Jun 2, 2012, 7:56 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Exhale solutions.
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,614
I was randomly looking at the Buenos Aires page on Wikipedia and CANNOT BELIEVE what I stumbled upon...

Just look at this picture titled Puerto Madero towers. It apparently is an redeveloping docklands area of the city. The caption reads "High-rise condominium towers along Dock 3 representing the latest architectural trends in the city, Puerto Madero district."


wiki


This is just too similar to be a coincidence.
__________________
Nothing useless can be truly beautiful. -W.Morris | Nothing Need be Ugly
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #360  
Old Posted: Jun 2, 2012, 8:39 PM
J_M_Tungsten's Avatar
J_M_Tungsten J_M_Tungsten is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,895
Whoa! Which one came first?
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise Construction
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:26 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.