vehicle

[Smh304]

what means "vehicle"?
& what different by "Ship" or "Machine" or "Air Plane"?
IF Deleting "Vehicle" in "Structure Type" not better?

[M.K.]

Originally Posted by Smh304

what means "vehicle"?
& what different by "Ship" or "Machine" or "Air Plane"?
IF Deleting "Vehicle" in "Structure Type" not better?

as I see, scientifically:
1- Vehicle means Ve-Hi-Cle = Velocity High in Cyclus ('y' is here 'and' in spanish of 'us'=humans) of Cloro Energy like Paul Cle. So if going high in some way, climbing mountains or air... it is in sky like scrapping sky, rise high = highrise. If you stop a very vertical dimensional 'Vehicle' you have in anyway a 'building'. Of course it was built in some way, not necessary to be inside earth to be fixed ...
2- Ship i like S-Hip, again Hip is High of sudden vertical movement and S is Ying Yang of Harmony of White and black positioned in vertical inclination for allowing continuous movement = Traffic and Changes, continuous transformations.
3- Machine means Mach-in-e comes from Mach = in German Macht = Power, Velocity in of inside (in-side, intern) and e of energy, but can be also Mac-hi-ne of Computer Mac of designing High Neutrons of energy, which can be also high in movement or transformation. Movement is always only a temporary transformation, it does not matter much the term.
4- Air Plane means Ai-r Plan-e, so Ai (->) for right Plan of Energy, so movement to it floats. Ai confunds with pronunciation High, but also ai in meaning of transformation to go forward in movement.

As you see in all them has the term High, belonging also to the static structure type without the 2 degree of transformation of movement. However all them is necessary a structure to exist in different type = form, which is design. Hope contributing positive. So for me also this manmade type of structures deserve a right to be here because in relativeness they can be after a limit to be considered 'Tall'.

Remember that only the first letter is important, the rest is second pronunciation only to flow easier to say per mounth.

[vid]

Our definition is:

Vehicle: air, land, or water vehicle - no new structures of this type are to be added!

It includes boats, planes, cars, large digging machines, rockets, and so on. None of those are to be added.

[M.K.]

if earth still goes exist longer, none static structure you can move away, just the dynamic ones, so who caring. The buildings would be only the compendium of diagrams and photos in our computers library for reference of what to not doing and the good ones in another star place ... because as i see if earth goes soon too out its inclination balance, the pieces goes shooting all long the milk galaxy and this sun system could be Goodbye, because the hard human interference inside .... Anyway, not a problem prohibiting them here. Unfortunatly this documentation of appearance would be not catalogued... But anyway I hope the guy starting the thread understand both view points ! Negligency of intelligence

[vid]

If you're so concerned, then start your own website where you can store diagrams of things that aren't buildings.

[M.K.]

Originally Posted by vid

If you're so concerned, then start your own website where you can store diagrams of things that aren't buildings.

I can immagine people is doing already since some time, don't worry. It has parellal systems working hard. It is unfortunatly only that diagrams could be an alternative also that seems will lacks a lot. Why do you think has Google Earth, Sketchup, Street and people putting buildings fast, easy appearance and positioning all over the virtual globe ? think a bit. It is the main hide goal of Google nowadays in California, trying to show people with a web worldwide afraid to the worse. Actually all population is working for that without knowing even that... as hobby daily. It is not only a search internet tooling machine, it is much huger.... So answer you: I don't want to do twice, with less ressource. It is like already the beggining a small but very tooly enciclopedia of humans for easy consultancy and reference how were.

[vid]

Originally Posted by M.K.

I don't want to do twice, with less ressource.

Neither do we. Therefore, no vehicles.

[Dylan Leblanc]

I think there are a few vehicles in the database, large ones which were allowed simply to compare their size against actual buildings.

We don't want a proliferation of vehicles though, so there is really no need to add any more.

[Smh304]

Sauroposeidon Proteles
The Big Apple
Malayan Terminalia
Jet d'eau
Godzilla
Fresh Kills Landfill
SkyScraperPage Poster
& ...

ther are added in your site
& hindenburg ,BIG MUSKIE ,F-60 ,The SILVER SPADE ... not add

THIS IS VERY FUNNY

HA HA HA HA
Im Sorry!

[M.K.]

The theory here seems either 100% all in or 0% nothing out. Am i right? R: N..
See for example this theory repeated centenial times here by all members, mainly from Eduardo: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=177613
Until the low limit of ALL structures will never be decided, this continues ad infinitum... Joking only... OMG Sorry also... I beg forgiveness...

[KevinFromTexas]

Stick to the topic.