HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise Construction

    

7 Bryant Park in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • New York Skyscraper Diagram
New York Projects & Construction Forum
            
View Full Map

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted: Feb 23, 2012, 4:59 AM
THE BIG APPLE's Avatar
THE BIG APPLE THE BIG APPLE is offline
KING OF NEW YORK
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,003
The height hasn't been announced yet, but for a 450,000 sq ft tower, the 250-300 foot mark sounds about right. I'm sure the aerodynamics of the building can make it go above the 300+ foot mark.

Wasn't there at least 100,000 sq ft of air rights above the demolished building.

Last edited by THE BIG APPLE; Feb 23, 2012 at 5:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted: Feb 23, 2012, 2:47 PM
yankeesfan1000 yankeesfan1000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 10014
Posts: 1,050
The video is amazing, thanks RW. Definitely worth checking out.

http://www.7bryantpark.com/tour/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted: Feb 23, 2012, 2:56 PM
RobertWalpole RobertWalpole is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,917
My pleasure, sir.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted: Feb 23, 2012, 2:59 PM
sbarn sbarn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,517
Damn, that was a good video. I want to work there...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted: Feb 24, 2012, 1:02 AM
reencharles's Avatar
reencharles reencharles is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 197
The video is excellent. Despite being a low building, will be a good fill. I loved the lighting at night, will combine with the BOA.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted: Feb 24, 2012, 2:10 AM
THE BIG APPLE's Avatar
THE BIG APPLE THE BIG APPLE is offline
KING OF NEW YORK
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,003
This will be a good back drop to the SW portion of Bryant Park, as the BoA Tower is to the NW portion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted: Feb 24, 2012, 3:01 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Exhale solutions.
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,612
Yeah both the building & the video are pretty slick. Anyone else notice that the "7" logo is referencing the concave notch in the design?
__________________
Nothing useless can be truly beautiful. -W.Morris | Nothing Need be Ugly
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted: Feb 24, 2012, 4:09 AM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 7,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE BIG APPLE View Post
The height hasn't been announced yet, but for a 450,000 sq ft tower, the 250-300 foot mark sounds about right.
The building will be 450 ft.

It's both listed at the website and at NYC DOB.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted: Feb 24, 2012, 5:43 AM
StatenIslander237's Avatar
StatenIslander237 StatenIslander237 is offline
Welcome to the Island
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 1,530
AHHHH LOVE THE EVENING LIGHTING. It will totally bounce off of Bank of America Tower perfectly. They'll be like big brother and little brother. As if Bryant Park weren't already a remarkable location, this will help make it an unmatched urban space.
__________________
"Also, to be frank, I like dense cities best and care about them most." from The Death And Life of Great American Cities by Jane Jacobs.
~Visit Staten Island~
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted: Feb 24, 2012, 1:30 PM
THE BIG APPLE's Avatar
THE BIG APPLE THE BIG APPLE is offline
KING OF NEW YORK
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,003
450 feet is FINE. I'm not complaining, but it seems a bit high for a 450k sq ft tower. Maybe the configuration is a bit different, and the aesthetics.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted: Feb 24, 2012, 2:43 PM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 7,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE BIG APPLE View Post
450 feet is FINE. I'm not complaining, but it seems a bit high for a 450k sq ft tower. Maybe the configuration is a bit different, and the aesthetics.
There are 700-foot towers that are only 250,000 square feet. And, as you can see from the rendering, 7 Bryant Park isn't particularly fat nor thin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted: Feb 24, 2012, 2:49 PM
THE BIG APPLE's Avatar
THE BIG APPLE THE BIG APPLE is offline
KING OF NEW YORK
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,003
^ Yeah but those 700 footers are thinner and taller, thus most of the space is mechanical, and the tower is thin so it is equivalent to 250k sq ft. A 'normal' configuration for example is the ESB which is 1,250 ft tall and is over 2 million sq ft.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted: Feb 24, 2012, 5:06 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is online now
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 2,157
^ The video did advertise high floors heights, which would make sense for an office building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted: Feb 24, 2012, 5:20 PM
THE BIG APPLE's Avatar
THE BIG APPLE THE BIG APPLE is offline
KING OF NEW YORK
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,003
^ High floor to ceiling heights make more sense in residential buildings, but office buildings (in modern day) have had higher f-to-c heights, than compared to long ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted: Mar 20, 2012, 1:59 PM
RobertWalpole RobertWalpole is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,917
I'd like to see Chadborne anchor this tower.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/busines...ntent=Business
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted: Mar 23, 2012, 2:48 AM
NOPA NOPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 208
This is a handsome tower! I'd certainly prefer it to be a bit taller but oh well.

Also, I think higher office f-to-c heights are certainly the new trend... I read interesting article on office space design in San Francisco that mentions this. Tech firms are locating in the trendy SOMA district (think warehouses, lofts, etc) while the traditional Financial District is losing out.

http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/deve...ma-destination
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted: Mar 26, 2012, 11:21 PM
RobertWalpole RobertWalpole is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,917
Many permits we're filed with the DoB last week. I wonder if Hines has a tenant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted: Mar 27, 2012, 12:12 AM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is online now
World Machine
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY/CT
Posts: 6,323
I imagine this one will get jumped on . . that is a very desirable area that's located in relatively respectable proximity to GCT and Penn.
__________________
New York, New York- A city so nice they named it twice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted: Mar 27, 2012, 12:39 AM
babybackribs2314 babybackribs2314 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UWS, Manhattan
Posts: 1,432
My blurb:

http://newyorkyimby.blogspot.com/201...ixth.html#more

The permits indicate the building will be 29 stories and 441' high, so at least we have an official height on this one!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted: Mar 27, 2012, 12:48 AM
yankeesfan1000 yankeesfan1000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 10014
Posts: 1,050
Agreed, if I remember correctly Hines was always planning on building this without a major tenant. This is a perfect location for Chadbourne & Park who's deal at 1 WTC fell through because they didn't want to relocate downtown and their board strongly preferred a midtown location.

Really recommend looking through the videos and renders on the website: http://www.7bryantpark.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise Construction
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:56 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.