HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #361  
Old Posted: Apr 10, 2012, 4:53 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 34,811
^concur. Akash resounds much more with many and I think there is a real push for new blood. That said, Glenora will be predominantly Laurie i'd imagine unless they are also voting strategically.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #362  
Old Posted: Apr 10, 2012, 6:43 PM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: somewhere up north
Posts: 5,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdmTrekker View Post
Its Bob and Ledcor. They may not sue but will negotiate compensation.
Every agreement can be cancelled. That said no way in hell am I voting for WR.

No Federal Building - she said a waste
Open the muni to flights
No museum
No LRT
Slash and burn public sector (death bell for Edmonton)

What a btch...
But don't worry, in a few years you'll get a couple hundred bucks right from the government! That makes everything better, didn't you know?

I can sympathize with the opinion of wanting a change in politics for Alberta. The PCs really have had power for way, way, way too long. I'd just rather they not exit at a time of

A) Them having a more moderate leader

2) The alternative being Danielle Smith

Why are so many Edmontonians indifferent and apathetic about the prospects Edmonton doesn't have if the Wildrose gets in? Can we say welcome back to the gloomy Alberta of the '90s (except this time there could be economic boom)? Smith is the Dorward of provincial politics. She isn't forward, she's Dorward.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tallisgood View Post
When Decore was the Liberal leader they understood that to get elected they would have to be fiscally on the conservative side, and they came fairly close to getting elected.

After Decore they latched onto the "Klein is Satan" mantra of the NDP and rode it right into oblivion. It made them popular with the CBC and the Journal, but not with ordinary people.

Blame the rise of the Wild Rose on the incompetence of the Liberal Party's leadership for the last 15 or so years. I'm only voting PC because the Liberals are too dumb to be in power, and because a vote for anyone but the PCs is a vote for D Smith.
I mean, I totally understand strategic voting and won't criticize anyone for participating in it. If your only goal is for X party to not get in, then I see no other way. But what happened to voting for a party instead of just voting against a party? Surely there's more issues you care about than the state of Edmonton, such as health care, education, the oil sands, economic diversification, etc. What's wrong with voting for the party you actually believe in? A lot of you guys seem to align with the Libs and NDPs. AFAIC, they aren't going to stop the RAM or re-open the Muni debate.

Sure, you could say they have no chances at winning anyways. Of course they don't, not with that attitude. But just look at how far the Federal NDPs have gone to show that things can change. It was quite fascinating to hear about how the NDP would never get into power, their policies aren't accepted in mainstream Canada, blah blah blah, and months later they're Official Opposition. Look to the demise of the Bloc Quebecois as well and the Green Party finally achieving a seat in federal politics.

I will say that it is kinda sad how conservative (in the Canadian context) dominated this province is. I mean, this election is essentially over the right and the righter. No need to worry about vote-splitting in Alberta! I don't say this just as a left-leaning individual either, because I think it'd be nice to have a healthy mixture of left and right leaning governments, like other provinces enjoy. It would open people up to new ideas (no wonder Albertans are overwhelmingly conservative, what when it's all they really know) and give a variety of things to benefit from in Alberta, both from the left and right of the spectrum.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #363  
Old Posted: Apr 10, 2012, 11:11 PM
bulliver's Avatar
bulliver bulliver is offline
So very tired...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Old Strathcona, Edmonton
Posts: 3,037
Speaking of Dorward, he's running for the PCs in my riding. Strategic or not, I will not vote for him.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #364  
Old Posted: Apr 11, 2012, 12:19 AM
BLACK STAR's Avatar
BLACK STAR BLACK STAR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,065
I saw the signs when driving through Capilano today. I was surprised!
__________________
Beverly to 96st then all the way down to Riverdale...

Word has it Scott Hennig will find this financial plan unacceptable! And any new retail development will just take from others! Nothing EVER grows...it just shifts!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #365  
Old Posted: Apr 24, 2012, 4:20 AM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,672
The RAM will get built! Suck it, Danielle!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #366  
Old Posted: Apr 24, 2012, 4:39 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 34,811
Let's hope so.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #367  
Old Posted: Apr 24, 2012, 2:52 PM
Gary Wayne Gary Wayne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 205
Lets hope we see shovels in the ground soon ,befor someone else comes up with any reason why it should be postponed. Lets not forget that Alison Redford is not a hudge fan of the museum but was pushed into it going forward. I just wish Edmonton could do a lot more to fast track developments so as not to give any time for negative lobby groups to rear their ugly heads.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #368  
Old Posted: Apr 24, 2012, 2:58 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 34,811
^I have to think it is somewhat secure now... but yes, who knows.

Fast track has many inherent liabilities though, caveat emptor
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #369  
Old Posted: Apr 24, 2012, 3:50 PM
cdnklc cdnklc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
^I have to think it is somewhat secure now... but yes, who knows.

Fast track has many inherent liabilities though, caveat emptor
caveat emptor perhaps, but i will still happily take a "fast track" than "no track at all" if we are actually going to get somewhere with some of these things as a city and a province...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #370  
Old Posted: Apr 24, 2012, 4:42 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 34,811
'caveat emptor perhaps, but i will still happily take a "fast track" than "no track at all" if we are actually going to get somewhere with some of these things as a city and a province...'

Absolutely Ken, but much with much more overseeing of said 'things'.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #371  
Old Posted: Apr 24, 2012, 8:32 PM
cdnklc cdnklc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
'caveat emptor perhaps, but i will still happily take a "fast track" than "no track at all" if we are actually going to get somewhere with some of these things as a city and a province...'

Absolutely Ken, but much with much more overseeing of said 'things'.
well you can't have your cake and eat it too Ian when it comes to wanting "much more overseeing of said 'things'" but also being prepared to say "don't worry about this one because it's being done by ___" and "don't worry about that one because it's being done by ___" or "you shouldn't worry about it because i've seen it and it's great"...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #372  
Old Posted: Apr 24, 2012, 9:35 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is online now
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton- no snappy tag line required
Posts: 6,865
Back in my former life as a construction manager, I loved fast track jobs (I've done more than my share) They require much more precise coordination which is where true project managers are weeded out from the herd. The big variable is almost always labor. Cost falls into line if you have done your job properly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #373  
Old Posted: Jun 25, 2012, 6:17 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 34,811
Remediation to start late this summer, demo to follow with construction to begin early 2013 it sounds like.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #374  
Old Posted: Jul 31, 2012, 1:31 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,672
New postal outlet opens

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/...214/story.html

Quote:
On Friday — almost 46 years after its official opening in the Sir Alexander Mackenzie building on July 29, 1966 — the branch served its last customer. The site on 103A Avenue is to be transformed into the new Royal Alberta Museum.

By 9 a.m. Monday morning, after a busy weekend of moving and labelling more than 1,000 post office boxes, the new main branch opened 20 blocks to the west in Oliver Square, at 11808 104th Avenue. A sign on the doors of the old building advised customers of the move.
Quote:
While the retail services have now moved, a Canada Post depot and administrative offices are still located in the building. Tailby said they will relocate within the coming year.

Lopatka said the province expects to get full access to the building by April 2013. Construction of the museum is now expected to be complete by 2016, rather than 2015 as previously announced, she said.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #375  
Old Posted: Aug 30, 2012, 9:27 PM
Gary Wayne Gary Wayne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 205
Am i the only one who is a little nervous that The government may put the muzeum on hold do to lover oil prices.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #376  
Old Posted: Aug 30, 2012, 9:40 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is online now
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton- no snappy tag line required
Posts: 6,865
^ I just saw that the government is forecasting a 2-3 billion deficit for this year due to "low" oil prices.

Excuse me ? $82-94/ bbl is 'low' ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #377  
Old Posted: Aug 30, 2012, 11:08 PM
BLACK STAR's Avatar
BLACK STAR BLACK STAR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,065
It is when the Alt Govt budgeted for a 100.00 + per barrel budget!

Big Red has said however the Museum will commence due to the Feds financial involvement.
__________________
Beverly to 96st then all the way down to Riverdale...

Word has it Scott Hennig will find this financial plan unacceptable! And any new retail development will just take from others! Nothing EVER grows...it just shifts!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #378  
Old Posted: Aug 30, 2012, 11:19 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,672
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmont...a-deficit.html

Quote:
Government departments have been directed to review their capital projects and keep their spending below budget. The new Royal Alberta Museum will not be affected, Horner said.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #379  
Old Posted: Sep 6, 2012, 1:57 AM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonotn
Posts: 2,000
The parking lot to the east of CNtower is closed as of October 1.
__________________
"I know a man whose school could never teach him patriotism, but who acquired that virtue when he felt in his bones the vastness of his land, and the greatness of those who founded it." - Pierre Elliott Trudeau
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #380  
Old Posted: Jan 25, 2013, 5:53 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,672
I can't help but worry that the new RAM will suffer from one of those "hard budget decisions" that Redford stated last night.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:51 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.