Statistiques démographiques - Page 3

Vaillant · #41 Posted: **Aug 28, 2011, 8:30 PM**

according to the population clock, Quebec hit 8 000 000 today at 1:45pm

http://www.statcan.gc.ca/ig-gi/pop-qc-eng.htm

caltrane74 · #42 Posted: **Aug 28, 2011, 8:33 PM**

yay!!!!

To keep things in balance, Ontario needs to hit 14,000,000 people, quicktime.

ue · #43 Posted: **Aug 28, 2011, 8:42 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by caltrane74

yay!!!!

To keep things in balance, Ontario needs to hit 14,000,000 people, quicktime.

Quick, Ontarians, boot it up now!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:QuickTime_7_Icon.png

You'll achieve fast results in Quicktime.

Vaillant · #44 Posted: **Aug 28, 2011, 8:44 PM**

Quebec will be at 9 000 000 faster then it took to get at the 8 000 000 it's a fact!

caltrane74 · #45 Posted: **Aug 28, 2011, 9:12 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by ue

Quick, Ontarians, boot it up now!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:QuickTime_7_Icon.png

You'll achieve fast results in Quicktime.

I think it will take another 5 or 6 years for Ontario to hit 14,000,000.

BretttheRiderFan · #46 Posted: **Aug 28, 2011, 11:24 PM**

Anyone know when Alberta should be hitting 4 million?

jigglysquishy · #47 Posted: **Aug 28, 2011, 11:28 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by BretttheRiderFan

Anyone know when Alberta should be hitting 4 million?

Likely 2016

Wooster · #48 Posted: **Aug 29, 2011, 1:03 AM**

Something very intriguing happening in Calgary right now is a record-breaking baby boom. The city is on pace for 18,000 births in 2011 according to Alberta Health. The previous record was a little over 10,000 in 2007. So a very significant spike and more that 100% increase over average.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...baby-boom.html

One can only assume the massive inmigration of younger people in 2005-2007 are settling in and all having children at once.

Spring2008 · #49 Posted: **Aug 29, 2011, 4:40 AM**

^You're forgetting about deaths though. Natural increase(including deaths) is forecasted to be around 11,000, not 18,000, in 2011. Still pretty high and a record for Calgary.

isaidso · #50 Posted: **Aug 29, 2011, 4:43 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spring2008

^You're forgetting about deaths though. Natural increase(including deaths) is forecasted to be around 11,000, not 18,000, in 2011. Still pretty high and a record for Calgary.

And you're assuming he's forgotten about deaths. Nothing in his post suggests that he has. Still, 11,000 is a great number. If all of Canada matched that we'd be growing by roughly 320,000/year just from natural increase. Net migration would get us to about 500,000/year.

Spring2008 · #51 Posted: **Aug 29, 2011, 4:54 AM**

^Reading the post implied that the previous record for births was around 10,000. The 10,000 record is natural increase not the previous record for births in one year.

MolsonExport · #52 Posted: **Aug 29, 2011, 1:28 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vaillant

according to the population clock, Quebec hit 8 000 000 today at 1:45pm

http://www.statcan.gc.ca/ig-gi/pop-qc-eng.htm

This thread is supposed to be about Quebec hitting 8 million, not the breakdown of Calgary/Alberta's population increases, which is the subject of all the last 6 posts. So take this:

Finally!!! Been waiting decades for the 7-point-something million to edge up.

Calgarian · #53 Posted: **Aug 29, 2011, 2:24 PM**

If this thread is just about Quebec hitting 8 000 000, then shouldn't it be in the Quebec section?

freeweed · #54 Posted: **Aug 29, 2011, 3:30 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spring2008

^Reading the post implied that the previous record for births was around 10,000. The 10,000 record is natural increase not the previous record for births in one year.

Not to nitpick, but you're wrong. From the story:

Quote:

There's a baby boom in Calgary, with the city expecting a record 18,000 births this year.

That's almost double the previous record of 10,000 births set in 2007.

Original poster was 100% correct in what he said and implied, unless I'm missing something.

Anecdotal, but I can completely believe this story. Every other woman looked pregnant this year.

Spring2008 · #55 Posted: **Aug 29, 2011, 5:45 PM**

-Well then the article was wrong. It is illogical that the cities previous record for births be 10,000 when Calgary's had years with 10,000+ natural increases. That would mean nobody in the city died from natural causes......AFAIK natural deaths are around 5-8,000/year...

Vulcain · #56 Posted: **Aug 31, 2011, 9:23 PM**

les estimations des villes du Québec qui sont diffusées chaque années les 1 juillet c'est disponible à quel moment ?

je me souviens d'avoir vu un tableau avec les estimations au 1 juillet 2010 l'an passé

Dirt_Devil · #57 Posted: **Aug 31, 2011, 10:10 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vulcain

les estimations des villes du Québec qui sont diffusées chaque années les 1 juillet c'est disponible à quel moment ?

je me souviens d'avoir vu un tableau avec les estimations au 1 juillet 2010 l'an passé

Probablement que ça va être lorsque les données du recensement 2011 vont sortir...donc début février 2012 si je ne me trompe pas!

Vulcain · #58 Posted: **Sep 2, 2011, 9:04 PM**

ca vient chaque année de l'institut de la statistique du Québec ... ils font une estimation au 1 juillet de chaque années

Vaillant · #59 Posted: **Sep 2, 2011, 9:45 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vulcain

ca vient chaque année de l'institut de la statistique du Québec ... ils font une estimation au 1 juillet de chaque années

vers le 3 février normalement..

Vulcain · #60 Posted: **Sep 2, 2011, 11:47 PM**

d'accord merci l'ami