HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Jun 20, 2009, 7:07 PM
Thundertubs's Avatar
Thundertubs Thundertubs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Posts: 2,850
Hard Times for New England's 3-Deckers

Interesting read. These things are a vital part of the urban fabric of inner-city New England, in any old factory town big or small.


Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/20/us...e.html?_r=1&em
By ABBY GOODNOUGH
Published: June 19, 2009


Jodi Hilton for The New York Times

NEW BEDFORD, Mass. — As foreclosures batter the dense neighborhoods of urban New England, a regional emblem is under siege.

Terrence Hope is a tenant in a triple-decker in New Bedford, Mass. The city helped a new owner renovate the property.
Three-decker homes, which proliferated in cities like Boston; Providence, R.I.; and Worcester, Mass., a century ago and remain fixtures of the landscape, are being foreclosed on at disproportionate rates, left to decay and even razed.

Rows of wood-frame triple-deckers have provided moody backdrops in movies like “Mystic River,” a first glimpse of Boston for people who have landed at Logan International Airport and, for generations, an affordable and reasonably spacious place to live.

In the boom years, three-deckers presented a different kind of opportunity. Out-of-town investors bought them, sometimes by the block, and rented them out without keeping them up.

“For many people, they’re a form of business,” said Timothy M. Warren Jr., chief executive of the Warren Group in Boston, which tracks real estate transactions. “There are absentee landlords, they take the risk, and if it doesn’t work, they walk.”

In Boston, three-family homes represent 14 percent of the housing stock, but made up 21 percent of foreclosed property in 2008, according to the city’s Department of Neighborhood Development.

In Lynn, Mass., three-family homes make up 9 percent of the housing stock and 22 percent of foreclosures, according to the Warren Group.

And here in New Bedford, a struggling seaport city, they make up 16 percent of the housing stock and 32 percent of foreclosures.

The price of triple-deckers has fallen much more than that of single-family homes and condominiums, said Tony Giacalone, owner of Tony’s Realty in East Boston, a working-class neighborhood. In his section of the city, Mr. Giacalone said, triple-deckers that sold for as much as $540,000 at the height of the market in 2004 are now going for about $300,000, with some bank-owned properties listed as low as $150,000.

While extinction is unlikely, the blight could forever change some neighborhoods where the triple-deckers are tightly packed, strikingly uniform and vital to the sense of place.

The boxy homes, which typically have flat roofs and tiers of porches, were built starting in the late 1800s to house the immigrant workers pouring into New England. They were a clear step up from tenement blocks, having private bathrooms and windows on every side.

Best of all, three-deckers put homeownership within reach of the working class. Buyers could live in one unit and rent out the others, assuring they could afford payments and upkeep for years to come.

“They were the speculative houses of the 1890s,” said Sally Zimmerman, a preservationist with Historic New England, a nonprofit group. “I’m not aware of any other class of building, at the time they were constructed, that presented the opportunity for home ownership at that scale.”

Living in a triple-decker, or at least within spitting distance of one, is almost as important to the cultural experience here as despising the Yankees and skipping work on St. Patrick’s Day. Dennis Lehane, who grew up amid three-deckers in Dorchester, a tough neighborhood of Boston, gave them prominent roles in “Mystic River,” “Gone Baby Gone” and his other noirish novels about the city.

“There’s a sublime beauty about them,” Mr. Lehane said. “Anything that is a unique characteristic of a region, that really tells you where you are, is exciting; it gives flavor, and you don’t see that much anymore.”

Foreclosed three-deckers have become prime targets for squatters, vandals and thieves, who sometimes set them on fire to gain access to copper pipes inside the walls. In Worcester, 60 percent of vacant, bank-owned dwellings with multiple code violations, are three-families, as are 21 of the city’s 27 condemned buildings.

In New Bedford, whose poorer neighborhoods brim with three-deckers, Mayor Scott W. Lang has set about demolishing the worst of them, including seven so far this year.

“It’s only a matter of time before it begins to spread like a cancer,” Mr. Lang said.

On some streets in New Bedford, tight rows of triple-deckers are now interrupted here and there by dirt lots, which impart the odd effect of missing teeth.

Patrick Sullivan, the city’s director of housing and community development, said its foreclosed three-deckers were mostly owned by absentee landlords who had scooped them up as investments and then let them decay. In one notorious case, Mr. Sullivan said, a single investor bought hundreds of properties in New Bedford and other Massachusetts cities during the real estate boom, ran up dozens of code violations and fled the country.

Mr. Lang hopes the demolitions make room for small parks, community gardens or parking lots.

“It might make sense to open up a little air, allow some green space, create a little more of a recreational-type pattern,” he said.

Boston, home to roughly 15,000 three-deckers, is taking a different approach. It has not demolished any abandoned three-deckers because city officials want to preserve as many affordable housing units as possible, said Evelyn Friedman, chief and director of the Boston’s Department of Neighborhood Development.

Modern zoning laws, Ms. Friedman said, would never allow three units on such small lots.

“If we have four three-deckers on 12,000 square feet and could only get two on that amount of land now,” Ms. Friedman said, “we are losing six units. So it’s very important to us to sustain them.”

Ms. Friedman believes the foreclosure rate on triple-deckers is even higher than the data indicate, because many were converted into condominiums in recent years. These are counted in a separate category that made up 48 percent of the city’s foreclosed properties last year.

Over the last year, the city has acquired a few dozen foreclosed three-deckers from banks and sold them to developers for rehabbing. In a pet project of Boston’s mayor, Thomas M. Menino, a developer is renovating a row of foreclosed three-deckers on Hendry Street in Dorchester, which had the highest concentration of foreclosed homes in Boston in 2008.

“My family had a three-decker, and when relatives came over from Italy, that’s the first place they all stayed,” said Mr. Menino, who grew up in the Hyde Park section of Boston.

But even if a city wanted to renovate every abandoned three-decker, the expense would probably be too much. Demolition is not cheap, either, so many blighted three-deckers could remain standing, yet uninhabitable, for years.

To devotees like Mr. Lehane, whose childhood home in Dorchester was a Victorian surrounded by three-deckers, even that might be better than wiping the landscape clean of them.

“When I see a three-decker, I immediately feel home,” he said. “Whereas if I see a Dallas or a Houston — that flat, suburban, here’s-another-McMansion look — I find that really depressing.”
__________________
Be magically whisked away to
Pacific NW | Montana | Vancouver, BC | Seattle, WA | Jersey City, NJ | Newark, NJ | Birmingham, AL | Butte, MT | Rockford, IL | Hoboken, NJ
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Jun 21, 2009, 7:17 AM
stax stax is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: DC/?NYC?
Posts: 74
Thanks for posting this, I was reading this last night, thinking how much the "triple-deckah" means to Boston's working-class character (what little bit of it is left). I grew up in one of these houses (in Dorchester), and while some of them are rather crappy on the outside, the interior aesthetics of many of them are amazing. I looked at that one street that was discussed in the article on Google Street View (Hendry Street): damn, that's depressing. The whole street looks foreclosed.
__________________
Democracy is three wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Jun 21, 2009, 7:24 AM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 7,322
Interesting article. I have walked Dot Ave a couple of times and gotten a good feel for these neighborhoods.

One thing though, these aren't really a New England housing typeology; they're a Boston housing typeology. I don't see these in Connecticut, in Western Mass, in Vermont, etc.

In Boston, though, they are THE housing typeology. I think most people automatically assume that Boston's central neighborhoods are similar to Philly or Baltmore and filled with rowhouses, but they're very different. Rowhouses are only in a few affluent neighborhoods immediately adjacent to downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Jun 21, 2009, 3:42 PM
Thundertubs's Avatar
Thundertubs Thundertubs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Posts: 2,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
One thing though, these aren't really a New England housing typeology; they're a Boston housing typeology. I don't see these in Connecticut, in Western Mass, in Vermont, etc.
.
As the article mentions, you can find concentrations in New Bedford, Worcester, and Providence (as well as Pawtucket/Central Falls/Woonsocket). Manchester has tons of them on the West and South ends. I've found them scattered from Hartford from up to Lewiston. There's even two in White River Junction, VT.


Nowhere else has them in quite the abundance as eastern Mass, but I'd say they are more than just a Boston thing, given the concetrations found from New Bedford up to Manchester.

In Western Mass and CT you start seeing more of (what I as a New Jerseyite know as) the '6-Pack' or 'Bayonne Box', which is the same idea but with two units per floor.
__________________
Be magically whisked away to
Pacific NW | Montana | Vancouver, BC | Seattle, WA | Jersey City, NJ | Newark, NJ | Birmingham, AL | Butte, MT | Rockford, IL | Hoboken, NJ
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Jun 21, 2009, 9:36 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: the naam
Posts: 13,391
Halifax has them too (West End), but you only see at most a few in a row, not entire neighbourhoods. They might exist elsewhere in the Maritimes (Saint John?), and obviously were imported from New England as a building style.
__________________
flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Jun 21, 2009, 11:38 PM
sukwoo sukwoo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oak Park, IL
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thundertubs View Post
Boston, home to roughly 15,000 three-deckers, is taking a different approach. It has not demolished any abandoned three-deckers because city officials want to preserve as many affordable housing units as possible, said Evelyn Friedman, chief and director of the Boston’s Department of Neighborhood Development.

Modern zoning laws, Ms. Friedman said, would never allow three units on such small lots.

“If we have four three-deckers on 12,000 square feet and could only get two on that amount of land now,” Ms. Friedman said, “we are losing six units. So it’s very important to us to sustain them.”
In other words, much of Boston's (very desirable) urban landscape could never be built today due to non-compliance with modern zoning. Perhaps we should rethink these zoning regulations?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Jun 22, 2009, 12:08 AM
miketoronto miketoronto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,268
It is a shame, but when it comes down to it these homes sadly are not places people who have an option want to live in. They just have fallen out of favour compared to having a single family home.

Hopefully something can be done to attract people back, but it sounds like the issue here, is a lot of people do not find these homes attractive, otherwise they would be just as in demand as other neighbourhoods in cities like Boston where housing is usually expensive.
__________________
Miketoronto
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted: Jun 22, 2009, 12:28 AM
sukwoo sukwoo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oak Park, IL
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by miketoronto View Post
It is a shame, but when it comes down to it these homes sadly are not places people who have an option want to live in. They just have fallen out of favour compared to having a single family home.

Hopefully something can be done to attract people back, but it sounds like the issue here, is a lot of people do not find these homes attractive, otherwise they would be just as in demand as other neighbourhoods in cities like Boston where housing is usually expensive.
They may be obsolete for families with children, but in gentrified areas such as Cambridge and Somerville, they've been converted into very desirable condominiums.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted: Jun 22, 2009, 12:32 AM
seaskyfan seaskyfan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by miketoronto View Post
It is a shame, but when it comes down to it these homes sadly are not places people who have an option want to live in. They just have fallen out of favour compared to having a single family home.

Hopefully something can be done to attract people back, but it sounds like the issue here, is a lot of people do not find these homes attractive, otherwise they would be just as in demand as other neighbourhoods in cities like Boston where housing is usually expensive.
I don't think it's the housing type as much as the neighborhoods mentioned in the story. The apartments in triple deckers tend to be more spacious and light filed than similarly priced condos and the details are great.

Two-family houses (another popular housing type around Boston) are pretty popular in the suburbs north and west of the City. A lot of them have been turned into condos (or "condex").
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: Jun 22, 2009, 3:39 AM
Attrill Attrill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 953
I'm definitely attached to the style - growing up I lived in ones in Watertown, Somerville, and Jamaica Plain. My grandmother spent the majority of her life in one in Fitchburg.

Unfortunately I'm not surprised that a lot of them can't be saved. They are great buildings if maintained properly - it not the framing and foundation can deteriorate in less than a decade. Add to that the fact that many have asbestos shingles and lead paint, and rehabbing one can get VERY expensive very quickly. I have a relative (a contractor) who bought the triple-decker he grew up in Southie with plans to rehab it, and had to throw in the towel and tear it down due to the reasons I stated above. I looked at some late 1800's balloon frame houses in Chicago that suffered from the same problems.
__________________
"Think like men of action. Act like men of thought."
Henri Bergson
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted: Jun 22, 2009, 3:48 AM
Attrill Attrill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thundertubs View Post
As the article mentions, you can find concentrations in New Bedford, Worcester, and Providence (as well as Pawtucket/Central Falls/Woonsocket). Manchester has tons of them on the West and South ends. I've found them scattered from Hartford from up to Lewiston. There's even two in White River Junction, VT.


Nowhere else has them in quite the abundance as eastern Mass, but I'd say they are more than just a Boston thing, given the concetrations found from New Bedford up to Manchester.

In Western Mass and CT you start seeing more of (what I as a New Jerseyite know as) the '6-Pack' or 'Bayonne Box', which is the same idea but with two units per floor.
Judging from the Rudy and McCain signs in that shot I'm guessing it was taken looking North and the building is just barely in NH

The '6-pack' is fairly common in Boston as well - especially in East and South Boston. I've seen it in Greenfield and N. Adams quite a bit as well.

The Blackstone Valley might have the largest concentration of the general triple-decker style outside of Boston, they're everywhere through that stretch of New England.
__________________
"Think like men of action. Act like men of thought."
Henri Bergson
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted: Jun 22, 2009, 12:15 PM
ItsConanOBrien ItsConanOBrien is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 2,961
Quote:
Originally Posted by sukwoo View Post
In other words, much of Boston's (very desirable) urban landscape could never be built today due to non-compliance with modern zoning. Perhaps we should rethink these zoning regulations?

Agreed. A lot of the triple-deckers around here are very nice condominiums that look great all fixed up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted: Jun 23, 2009, 12:17 AM
Jeff_in_Dayton Jeff_in_Dayton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,575
These sound just a little bit like the Chicago two- and three-flat. But these look to be nicer and have those multistory porchers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted: Jun 23, 2009, 1:20 AM
sukwoo sukwoo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oak Park, IL
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff_in_Dayton View Post
These sound just a little bit like the Chicago two- and three-flat. But these look to be nicer and have those multistory porchers.
We have porches in Chicago too, but they usually are in back.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted: Jun 23, 2009, 3:29 AM
M. Brown's Avatar
M. Brown M. Brown is offline
The Believer
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
Interesting article. I have walked Dot Ave a couple of times and gotten a good feel for these neighborhoods.

One thing though, these aren't really a New England housing typeology; they're a Boston housing typeology. I don't see these in Connecticut, in Western Mass, in Vermont, etc.

In Boston, though, they are THE housing typeology. I think most people automatically assume that Boston's central neighborhoods are similar to Philly or Baltmore and filled with rowhouses, but they're very different. Rowhouses are only in a few affluent neighborhoods immediately adjacent to downtown.
You should take a look at Manchester, NH. Most of Central and West Manchester are triple deckers. Portland, Maine has a lot too. Its probably more of an eastern New England thing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted: Jun 24, 2009, 10:02 PM
Jeff_in_Dayton Jeff_in_Dayton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,575
A fascinating book on Three-Deckers.
Patina of Place, the Cultural Weathering of a New England Vernacular Landscape

n the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the booming textile industry turned many New England towns and villages into industrialized urban centers. This rapid urbanization transformed the built environment of communities such as New Bedford, Massachusetts, as new housing styles emerged to accommodate the largely immigrant workforce of the mills. In particular, the wood-frame “three-decker” became the region’s multifamily housing design of choice in urban areas and is widely acknowledged as a unique architectural form that is characteristic of New England. In The Patina of Place, Kingston Heath offers the first book-length analysis of the three-decker and its cultural significance, revealing New Bedford’s evolving regional identity within New England.

The Patina of Place offers a multidisciplinary analysis of workers’ housing as an index to social change and cultural identity in New Bedford from 1848 to 1925. Heath discusses both the city’s company-owned mill housing and the subsequent transition to a speculative building market that established the three-decker rental flat as the city’s most common housing form for industrial workers.

Using the concept of “cultural weathering” to explore the cultural imprints left by inhabitants on their built environment, Heath considers whether the three-decker is a generic “type” that could be transferred elsewhere. He concludes that the ethnic, economic, and geographic conditions of a locale serve as filters that reshape the meaning, utility, and character of a building form, thereby making it an integral part of its particular community. Specifically, he shows how the three-decker was lived in, and used by, its original inhabitants and illustrates its transformation by later generations of residents following the collapse of the textile industry in the mid-1920s.

The Patina of Place focuses on the three-decker in New Bedford, but its overarching theme concerns the cultural, economic, and social complexities of place-making and the creation of regional identity. Heath offers a broad investigation of the forces that drive the production and consumption of architecture, at the same time providing an economic and cultural context for the emergence of a particular architectural form.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted: Mar 17, 2012, 9:03 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 2,189
Worcester is loaded with triple deckers, and most of them do alright because of the high demand for student housing.

http://binged.it/FSpz8q

I could have sworn that I saw a thread somewhere around here for new construction triple deckers. Anyone remember where it was?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted: Apr 16, 2012, 2:35 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 2,189
Or maybe not:

Three-decker threat

Iconic structures placed on list for preservation

By Bronislaus B. Kush TELEGRAM & GAZETTE STAFF
bkush@telegram.com


At one point, there were about 6,000 of the structures in the city. During the 1970s, a third of Worcester’s population was living in three-deckers.

Three-decker construction, however, ended in the early 1930s with the economic downturn caused by the Great Depression.

Blocks of Worcester three-deckers were also leveled over the years to make way for Interstate 290, the so-called urban revitalization of the downtown in the late 1960s and early 1970s, and commercial development along Park Avenue and other major corridors.

Today, there are 4,876 three-deckers and PW officials are worried many of those will be razed. Some of those are among the 180 that were placed, during the 1970s, on the National Register of Historic Places.

http://www.telegram.com/article/20120325/NEWS/103259847
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:20 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.