Quote:
Originally Posted by vid
What I find most interesting is that Toronto is looking at it before kids are being run down and killed in front of schools. It took several incidences involving children and cars ending in death before Thunder Bay implemented reduced speed limits near schools.
|
The thing is this isn't just reduced speed limits around schools, if it was I wouldn't even care. It's a
universal reduction that will see a limit of 40 km/h assigned to all arterial roads. Just an FYI, that's the current side street limit. For a city that already has woefully inadequate transportation, setting the limit that low is not going to entice more people onto bikes, it'll only frustrate existing commuters. The problem is bicycles and cars need separation on main arterials. London's got the right idea:
http://maps.google.ca/maps?q=adelaid...,183.9,,0,9.31
A paved bicycle path between the sidewalk and the roadway. Cheap and effective. And Adelaide Street still moves at 60 km/h.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid
We do have community safety zones where fines are increased but personally, if someone is speeding in a residential area and kills someone because of it, they should simply lose the privilege of driving. For ever.
|
I think that would constitute cruel and unusual punishment. It would also ignore any fault committed by the pedestrian. I've had numerous close calls with jaywalkers at night, and I don't feel like permanently losing my license just because some bloody idiot was too lazy to walk to the nearest crosswalk.