HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    425 Park Avenue in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2012, 2:12 AM
RobertWalpole RobertWalpole is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,911
Smile NEW YORK | 425 Park Ave | 860 FT | 42 FLOORS

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...FTForthStories

Planning New York's Next Iconic Building .

By ELIOT BROWN



Nearly a half century after much of Park Avenue's high-end corridor of office buildings were built, developer L&L Holding Co. is advancing plans for a new tower.

Aiming to create an iconic, eye-catching building in the place of a 1950s-built boxy tower at 425 Park Ave., L&L last week reached out to 11 top architectural firms to join a competition to design a new tower. The list included Norman Foster, Richard Rogers and Jean Nouvel, each of whom have won architecture's top Pritzker Prize.

L&L Holding Co. has asked 11 top architects to submit designs for a new tower at 425 Park Ave. "We want to work with the best architectural minds out there, because we have some very important things to achieve and to deal with," says David Levinson, L&L's chief executive.

Mr. Levinson says he hopes to begin demolition work in 2015 and to finish the new building two years later. The price tag on the project is expected to be about $750 million, he says.

The bold plan to knock down the bulk of the existing building and to put a new one in its place reflects Mr. Levinson's faith in the value of the site. Currently the building is mostly leased with tenants including the white-shoe law firm Kaye Scholer.

But Mr. Levinson is planning to vacate the building on the bet that he'll be able to substantially boost rents once he replaces it with a modern, attractive design. While older, unremarkable buildings similar to the current 425 Park Ave. tend to fetch annual rents in the $50-to-$70 per square foot range, top architectural icons the Seagram Building at 375 Park Ave. easily win tenants paying over $100 a foot.

The plan still faces high hurdles. For starters, Mr. Levinson needs to attract financing for the project at a time that the Manhattan office market shows some signs of weakness due to the downturn and the contraction of the financial services industry.

Mr. Levinson believes great architecture will enable him to attract tenants and financing. He hopes the building's design will be achieve the same distinction as the Seagram Building or the Lever House at 390 Park Ave., both of which are considered modernist icons.

Vishaan Chakrabarti, a former city planning official and director of Columbia University's Center for Urban Real Estate, is directing the competition for L&L. "We think it could be a jewel, and given where it sits, a crown jewel," Mr. Chakrabarti says.

Park Avenue has been largely static for at least four decades. The bulk of the office towers were erected in the 1950s and 1960s on platforms over rail tracks leading into Grand Central Terminal.

Most of the towers were built with a boxy design that creates a relatively uniform feel for the wide boulevard. The most recent large office building to be constructed was 499 Park, at 59th St., built in 1980, although it doesn't take up the full block.

Complicating the redevelopment for 425 Park and other buildings on Park Avenue is a quirk of the city's zoning code that would force Mr. Levinson to build a smaller tower if he demolished the existing building in its entirety. To avoid this, Mr. Levinson plans to leave in place the steel skeleton for the bottom 25% of the building, the minimum required.

The Bloomberg administration has told landlords it is considering boosting the development rights for office building owners in parts of eastern Midtown. But that plan would likely take at least another year and a half before it would be finalized, and Mr. Levinson has said he needs to begin planning now under the current rules.

L&L partnered with Lehman Brothers in 2006 to buy the long term lease on 425 Park. Lehman still has a stake in the building, although it is looking to exit all its real estate investments over the next few years.

Write to Eliot Brown at eliot.brown@wsj.com

Last edited by RobertWalpole; Apr 23, 2012 at 2:35 AM.
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2012, 2:20 AM
SkyscrapersOfNewYork's Avatar
SkyscrapersOfNewYork SkyscrapersOfNewYork is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,523
This has the potential to be a very innovative and creative project.
__________________
New York City,The City That Never Sleeps,The Capitol Of The World,The Big Apple,The Empire City,The Melting Pot,The Metropolis,Gotham

Buildings Over 200 Meters 62 Completed 20 Under Construction 50 Proposed 0 On Hold
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2012, 2:20 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,260
How bazaar. Leave 25% of the original building to skirt city zoning? I'd say more but I'm watching MadMen.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2012, 2:26 AM
RobertWalpole RobertWalpole is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyscrapersOfNewYork View Post
This has the potential to be a very innovative and creative project.
I agree.

P.S.: More good news is that this will displace, Kaye Scholer, a very high-end lawfirm that will be seeking several hundred thousand square feet of space!

Last edited by RobertWalpole; Apr 23, 2012 at 2:41 AM.
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2012, 2:48 AM
Dac150's Avatar
Dac150 Dac150 is offline
World Machine
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NY/CT
Posts: 6,749
Wow, very interesting - I look forward to following this over the next few years.
__________________
"I'm going there, but I like it here wherever it is.."
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2012, 2:51 AM
RobertWalpole RobertWalpole is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,911
I agree. This should be very impressive.
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2012, 3:41 AM
jd3189 jd3189 is offline
An Optimistic Realist
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Loma Linda, CA / West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 5,569
Awesome. This will be the start of what the new zoning will create. The East Side will keep up with the West.
__________________
Working towards making American cities walkable again!
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2012, 4:23 AM
reencharles's Avatar
reencharles reencharles is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 274
Wow They will demolish a large building ... I hope they can make a very modern building and super high. Still going very close to the 432 Park Place. It seems that Bloomberg's dream will come true. Just a pity that this will be demolished in 2015 and be built later (if the world does not end at the end of this year).


EDIT: I was reading this part:
"Complicating the redevelopment for 425 Park and other buildings on Park Avenue is a quirk of the city's zoning code that would force Mr. Levinson to build a smaller tower if he demolished the existing building in its entirety. To avoid this, Mr. Levinson plans to leave in place the steel skeleton for the bottom 25% of the building, the minimum required.

The Bloomberg administration has told landlords it is considering boosting the development rights for office building owners in parts of eastern Midtown. But that plan would likely take at least another year and a half before it would be finalized, and Mr. Levinson has said he needs to begin planning now under the current rules. "

And... It's a shame that Mr. Levinson will not wait for the upzoning to build something higher, since the rezoning it will take to be done, and the company wants to start planning early on this project. But let's see, a lot can change.
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2012, 11:57 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,691
Quote:
Aiming to create an iconic, eye-catching building in the place of a 1950s-built boxy tower at 425 Park Ave., L&L last week reached out to 11 top architectural firms to join a competition to design a new tower. The list included Norman Foster, Richard Rogers and Jean Nouvel, each of whom have won architecture's top Pritzker Prize.

This is always exciting. Can't wait to see what the various minds come up with.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2012, 4:54 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,691
http://therealdeal.com/blog/2012/04/...-avenue-tower/

L&L seeks architect for new Park Avenue tower



April 23, 2012

Quote:
L&L Holdings has taken a major step towards erecting the first new office tower along Park Avenue in more than 30 years. The Wall Street Journal reported the firm has reached out to 11 big-name architects, including three Pritzker Prize winners, for design ideas on a new skyscraper at 425 Park Avenue, between 55th and 56th Streets.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2012, 6:33 PM
Sky88's Avatar
Sky88 Sky88 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 377
Smile

How much could be tall this iconic tower?
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2012, 8:35 PM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky88 View Post
How much could be tall this iconic tower?
As explained above this building could be as tall as the Drake Hotel Redevelopment (432 Park Avenue).

Anyway guys it would be impressive to see buildings as tall as the roof height of the Sears Tower in Chicago rise in Midtown. Exciting news for Midtown, but not for the Empire State Building.
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2012, 1:52 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,691
This building will be more about design, and less about height. It will be an office tower, so that also takes a lot of height speculation off the table. It will be taller than the existing tower, but I don't expect it to challenge 432 Park in height.


http://artinfo.com/news/story/801187...ion-skyscraper

Zaha Hadid for Park Avenue? She and 10 Starchitects Compete to Design a $750-Million Skyscraper



by Kelly Chan
April 23, 2012

Quote:
The current building is already occupied by a pristine office tower, and L&L have bold plans to knock down the bulk of it to construct a bigger, badder "crown jewel." Moreover, the plan to leave part of the existing building in place is to dodge finicky city zoning codes, which would have forced L&L to build a smaller tower had the existing building been completely razed.

It is clear that L&L have placed incredible faith in the appeal of the site as well as the appeal of name brand design, enough to expect that tenants will happily shell out $100 or more per square foot. The plans exhibit architecture at its most aggressive, aiming to find a form that will turn dollar signs into even more dollar signs, or in more relevant terms, architecture of the 1%. Judging by the shortlist of architects, the aesthetic of Park Avenue's new skyscraper will make a similarly forceful statement, breaking through the uniformity of an avenue fossilized in the 1960's.


d.guija

__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2012, 2:37 PM
Oura's Avatar
Oura Oura is offline
~
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Orléans
Posts: 25
This tower has great massing. All what it needs is a reclad with limestone. Would be a shame to demolish it.
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2012, 3:11 PM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oura View Post
This tower has great massing. All what it needs is a reclad with limestone. Would be a shame to demolish it.
Or the new building can pay homage to the old one with a similar but more modern design.
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2012, 3:51 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,260
Quote:
The plans exhibit architecture at its most aggressive, aiming to find a form that will turn dollar signs into even more dollar signs, or in more relevant terms, architecture of the 1%.
This statement is kind of bullshit. Saying that about some palatial chateau neo-mansion, but a gorgeous uplifting edifice in an urban environment, viewable by all social classes is a public good - it's beauty and generative emotion does not benefit the "1%" anymore than the "99%."

Remember when developers and financiers used expressions like "for the enjoyment of the city..." et cetera, et cetera?

Interior designers may cringe, but for me the privately held interiors of a commercial building are the back of the painting.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2012, 10:32 PM
NOPA NOPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 320
Wow this could be as tall as 432 Park Ave? That's impressive.

@Roadcruiser1, the ESB has owned Midtown for 80 years, its time for new iconic towers to dominate.
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2012, 10:49 PM
jd3189 jd3189 is offline
An Optimistic Realist
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Loma Linda, CA / West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 5,569
Agreed. It's time for a new age in the New York skyline.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1 View Post
Or the new building can pay homage to the old one with a similar but more modern design.
The existing building already looks similar to this one.


But I'll be content with whatever idea they pick. Park Avenue has the potential to become another grand canyon of skyscrapers.
__________________
Working towards making American cities walkable again!
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2012, 12:28 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOPA View Post
Wow this could be as tall as 432 Park Ave? That's impressive.
Not likely. If it were residential, maybe.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Oura View Post
This tower has great massing. All what it needs is a reclad with limestone. Would be a shame to demolish it.
Likely needs a lot more than that. They're not just trying to build a more useful building, they are trying to build a tower suitable for the Manhattan market of today, or in other words, what would be built there today. Think in terms of the size of the floorplates, ceiling heights, and other amenities that the modern Manhattan office tower comes with.



http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/25/re...-levinson.html

The 30-Minute Interview
David W. Levinson


April 24, 2012


Quote:
Q. Are you working on many projects right now?

A. Some of our existing buildings are going through redevelopments. We are doing a very large retail development down at 195 Broadway, and probably our most important and most exciting new development is 425 Park Avenue.

Q. Let’s talk about your plans there.

A. We’ll be demolishing about 75 percent of the building. There’ll be a podium — of course the brick skin will come off — and we’ll build a new tower on top of the podium. The current condition of the building — it’s so dated — is that it’s not economically feasible to try to rehabilitate it. It’s not a sustainable building in terms of energy efficiency: there’s single-pane glass, old mechanical systems.

This is a very special and unique opportunity — it’s a full-block building. There has not been a full-block building built on Park Avenue in 50 years, and there’s no other in the foreseeable future.

Q. How do you envision the new building?

A. We’ll leave it to the architects, but I would guess probably the first six floors of steel will remain — that would be the podium — and then there will be a tower on top of that. We’ll start getting Central Park views probably about 300 feet up. There will probably be a variety of floor sizes. We’re looking to do it column free, floor-to-ceiling glass and sustainable — LEED platinum or gold. It’s going to be in the range of three-quarters of a billion dollars. So you have to create value.

We just invited 11 of the greatest architects in the world to compete for the design, and then we’ll get it down to a short list. We would like to hear back from them some time in early May to see if they’re interested. Hopefully we’ll have our architect selected by the early fall.

Q. What’s the development timetable?

A. It’s all “as of right,” which means we don’t need any special permission or permits. We just have to comply with all of the regulations. We’ll begin early spring 2015. All the current leases expire on the same day in April 2015. And we expect we’ll complete it by the end of 2017. None of us have ever seen a building demolished on Park Avenue.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2012, 1:36 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
If they have to wait for 2015 for the tenants to clear out, it seems like they would be able to take advantage of the rezoning.

On they other hand, they might be planning on buying out the leases.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:10 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.