HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > SSP: Local Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley

    Charleston Place in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Langley Skyscraper Diagram
            
View Full Map

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted: Apr 24, 2012, 4:46 AM
TheEmotionalstone TheEmotionalstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 39
Also, I wonder how they fooled anybody into thinking that that was at all close to a 1920's heritage design... The arched windows and the pyramid roof were only EVER popular in the 80's and early 90's (even though they were hideous then too!).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted: Apr 24, 2012, 5:28 AM
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,497
This isn't faux-heritage, but faux-pomo. As with all faux styles this can only look worse... yes worse than the 80's.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted: Apr 24, 2012, 7:05 AM
invisibleairwaves's Avatar
invisibleairwaves invisibleairwaves is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cloverhole, Surrey, BC
Posts: 494
Hey, it's gonna be great when they demo the site, fail to get enough sales, and leave a giant brown field in the middle of an already decrepit part of town. Should do wonders for the neighbourhood.
__________________
Reticulating Splines
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted: Apr 24, 2012, 3:34 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Planning Graduate Student
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,753
Wow that's bad. I'm trying to figure out at whom this is targeted. The 1920s Charleston dance-inspired dance floor makes me think this is retiree focused, even though anyone who was old enough to dance the Charleston in the 1920s would be well into their 90s at this point and probably not keen on dropping $400K+ on a condo in what I understand is an industrial area of Langley City. If they are pursuing young first-time buyers, why are the price points so high? If they are pursuing boomers and empty-nesters, why the so-called 1920s "inspired" aesthetic? And of all the places for a Calgary-based developer to get a toe hold in Metro Vancouver, why Langley City? And why a concrete high-rise in a sub-market that has historically had no appetite for them?
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis

Last edited by SFUVancouver; Apr 25, 2012 at 2:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted: Apr 25, 2012, 1:09 AM
skymaster skymaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 334
Looks like shit
__________________
Sky's not not the limit, it's only the beginning
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted: Apr 25, 2012, 1:31 AM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFUVancouver View Post
Wow that's bad. I'm trying to figure out at whom this is targeted. The 1920s Charleston dance-inspired dance floor makes me think this is retiree focused, even though anyone who was old enough to dance the Charleston in the 1920s would be well into their 90s at this point and probably not keen on dropping $400K+ on a condo in what I understand is an industrial area of Langley City. If they are pursuing young first-time buyers, why are the price points so high? If they are pursuing boomers and empty-nesters, why the so-called 1920s "inspired" aesthetic? And of all the places for a Calgary-based developer to get a toe hold in Metro Vancouver, why Langley City? And why a concrete high-rise in a sub-market that has historically had no appetite for them as a first project?
Maybe for those boomers who like the 1920 style and cause you gotta think when they were young 1920 wasn't that old. Baby boomer age was 1946 to 1965. So some 1920 building were still around then and maybe they grew up liking that style and always wishing to have a house or place like the grew up in when they were younger.
In fact I asked my own dad what his thoughts on this building were and he likes it. Hes a baby boomer who grew up his young life in Holland.
So maybe it could also be connected to older European boomers who grew up in cities where a lot of old building still stand.
But thats just a thought in my mind. Guess only time will tell who wants to buy into this building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted: Apr 25, 2012, 3:49 AM
mezzanine's Avatar
mezzanine mezzanine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,405
Wow, this is a real PoS!

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted: Apr 25, 2012, 3:43 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Whalley, the heart of Surrey, BC
Posts: 2,727
What. The. Fuh. Seems like this was designed back in the 90s but was scrapped in the down economy then, but now it's been revitalized and the developer is too cheap to have the design modernized.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted: Apr 25, 2012, 4:54 PM
geoff's two cents geoff's two cents is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 504
Sadly, a design like this also represents a colossal step backward design-wise compared with some of the more recent condo projects constructed in Langley's downtown along Fraser highway. In fact, given their design quality, I'm downright confused as to why something as awful as this could ever be approved in the first place!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted: Apr 25, 2012, 7:18 PM
invisibleairwaves's Avatar
invisibleairwaves invisibleairwaves is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cloverhole, Surrey, BC
Posts: 494
Quote:
Originally Posted by geoff's two cents View Post
Sadly, a design like this also represents a colossal step backward design-wise compared with some of the more recent condo projects constructed in Langley's downtown along Fraser highway. In fact, given their design quality, I'm downright confused as to why something as awful as this could ever be approved in the first place!
I wouldn't go that far, a lot of the new stuff in the area is pretty awful in its own right. At least this monstrosity sorta-kinda works at street level...
__________________
Reticulating Splines
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted: Apr 26, 2012, 1:52 AM
Cypherus's Avatar
Cypherus Cypherus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by geoff's two cents View Post
Sadly, a design like this also represents a colossal step backward design-wise compared with some of the more recent condo projects constructed in Langley's downtown along Fraser highway. In fact, given their design quality, I'm downright confused as to why something as awful as this could ever be approved in the first place!
Langley city council has been pushing density around the Cascades Casino as if it's some be all end all edifice for development. The whole area has an inner city feel complete with a dodgy bar that attracts mentally ill people, and a crappy cowboy-themed nightclub complete with overweight cougars in their late thirties. Might as well throw in some retarded looking condo and you got yourself a fitting urban plan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted: Apr 26, 2012, 3:00 AM
queetz@home's Avatar
queetz@home queetz@home is offline
Go Rotem! Die Bombardier!
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ortigas
Posts: 2,837
Goodness gracious what were they smoking when they designed this monstrosity????

If they take out the residential top, it maybe a bit more tolerable. But at its current form....yuck!
__________________
The only good Liberal is a BC Liberal....except Transport Minister Kevin Falcon (whose American counterpart is Wendell Cox). He is a disgrace to the BC Liberal Party and the transportation profession! Click and see the link below for more information as to why....http://www.livableregion.ca/index.html

RIP Evergreen Light Rail Transit
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted: Apr 26, 2012, 3:38 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant
Posts: 1,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cypherus View Post
Langley city council has been pushing density around the Cascades Casino as if it's some be all end all edifice for development. The whole area has an inner city feel complete with a dodgy bar that attracts mentally ill people, and a crappy cowboy-themed nightclub complete with overweight cougars in their late thirties. Might as well throw in some retarded looking condo and you got yourself a fitting urban plan.
There looks to be a pretty good base of retail to build around. With some more density, you would get a better mix of retail tenants and create a decent, urbanized town centre.

I like how the Shaughnessy area in Port Coquitlam is shaping up, maybe Langley should look there for an example on how to redevelop.

One thing I didn't really notice before, but is very apparent in the rendering, is the fact it is surrounded by parking lot. How did the city approve this?

Last edited by logan5; Apr 26, 2012 at 4:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted: Apr 26, 2012, 5:59 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam/Rainbow Lake
Posts: 25,424
langley already has a nice downtown and the areas to the east and south are where most of the residential is, why not dense that part up first? i really like downtown langley its quite quaint
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted: Apr 26, 2012, 11:32 PM
TheEmotionalstone TheEmotionalstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
langley already has a nice downtown and the areas to the east and south are where most of the residential is, why not dense that part up first? i really like downtown langley its quite quaint
Actually, the area this will (won't, I hope) be built is actually on the edge of what is the downtown of the City of Langley. You can find more information here - http://www.city.langley.bc.ca/index....wn-master-plan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted: Apr 27, 2012, 4:55 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam/Rainbow Lake
Posts: 25,424
yah i know where it is - it's a bizarre location - it should have been built more to the east or south perhaps
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > SSP: Local Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:22 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.