HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum

Since 1999, the SkyscraperPage Forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web. The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics. Welcome!

You are currently browsing as a guest. Register with the SkyscraperPage Forum and join this growing community of skyscraper enthusiasts. Registering has benefits such as fewer ads, the ability to post messages, private messaging and more.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 2, 2012, 12:58 PM
miketoronto miketoronto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,669
I would rather be on a train or bus than drive

I had to drive to Cleveland the other day, which is about a 5 hour drive from Toronto.

I would rather have taken a bus or train, but the schedules did not work out well, so I had to drive.

I have been on a road trips where friends drive, and it is fun, as you stop at place along the way.

But I really don't get why people get so excited to drive long distances when the trip involves just having to get where you need to go.

My brother for example refuses to use any form of transportation but his car. And he will drive 8 or 12 hours to get some place.

It was not the worst trip ever, and I could fully handle driving long distances.
But I really did not find it relaxing, etc.

Maybe I am just not born to drive a lot , because everyone said once I had my full license I would want to drive everywhere. But I still enjoy walking places, biking places, and taking public transit.

I do enjoy driving around the city to explore once in a while. But overall I still enjoy the other transport modes more often.

Are any of you the same?
__________________
Miketoronto
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 2, 2012, 1:07 PM
emathias's Avatar
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 3,112
When I was in my early 20s, I didn't mind - I even kinda liked - driving long distances just to see new places. These days, though, anything over an hour becomes very tedious to me (I'm 38). This actually contributes to my propensity to speed, because I just don't want to be behind the wheel any longer than absolutely necessary. Even in suburban LA, I was passing people left and right.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted May 2, 2012, 1:14 PM
ChiSoxRox's Avatar
ChiSoxRox ChiSoxRox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,469
Me too. On a train or a bus, you can do something productive like read or watch the scenery go by, instead of all attention focused on driving. As well, you're not (directly) paying for gas on a train or bus.
__________________
Like the pre-war masonry skyscrapers? Then check out my list of the tallest buildings in 1950.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted May 2, 2012, 1:49 PM
glowrock's Avatar
glowrock glowrock is offline
Couch-surfing provider
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Saudi Houstonia :(
Posts: 18,847
Mike, that somehow doesn't surprise me in the least... As for me, I have no problem driving long distances when needed, but there's no doubt that I'd rather fly, train, or bus it longer distances IF I won't need my car at all in and near my destination. In other words, why drive from Pittsburgh to Philadelphia for sightseeing when it's cheap and convenient to take Megabus, not to mention parking in Philly is atrocious? But if I needed to be in SUBURBAN Philly, then I'd drive. All depends on what you do at your destination city...

Aaron (Glowrock)
__________________
"The three most beautiful cities in the world are Paris, St. Petersburg & Pittsburgh. If Pittsburgh were situated somewhere in the heart of Europe tourists would eagerly journey hundreds of miles out of their way to visit it." The New Yorker Jan. 9, 1989
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted May 2, 2012, 2:38 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 13,066
I'm going to Vancouver this weekend (a rare visit as tourist, not seeing friends or relatives). I got a license recently for the first time in many years but renting a car didn't occur to me and still hasn't. I'm on Amtrak, which is just twice per day on this route, far worse than the equivalent trip to Portland. The Amtrak website replies with times for buses as an equivalent, at better times of day and slightly faster. I still picked train.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 2, 2012, 2:55 PM
Roadcruiser1's Avatar
Roadcruiser1 Roadcruiser1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,089
Use Amtrak .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted May 2, 2012, 3:25 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
born again cyclist
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Old Style City
Posts: 15,049
I would rather be on a bicycle


or alternatively, a kayak.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted May 2, 2012, 3:50 PM
brickell's Avatar
brickell brickell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: County of Dade
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by miketoronto View Post
But I really don't get why people get so excited to drive long distances when the trip involves just having to get where you need to go.
I can't say I know too many people who feel that way.
For most, driving is a chore, but it's still more convenient than rail travel (in many cases).
__________________
That's what did it in the end. Not the money, not the music, not even the guns. That is my heroic flaw: my excess of civic pride.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted May 2, 2012, 5:18 PM
Lipani's Avatar
Lipani Lipani is online now
< Stay away from these
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 770
I work in four different cities, but mostly in San Diego. The only time I change the following routine is if I don't return to San Diego immediately after a job is over. If I could do all of these trips via train I definitely would.

SD > LA - Amtrak
SD > SF - Fly
SD > Vegas - Drive
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted May 2, 2012, 5:28 PM
uaarkson's Avatar
uaarkson uaarkson is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,755
I love driving, and I hope that one day our dependence on cars is reduced to the point where actually driving a car is more about recreation, with good public transit there for the necessities of life. Many stretches of highway in this nation would be an absolute thrill to drive if there were simply less people driving on them!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted May 2, 2012, 6:29 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 11,466
Anything within town, I much prefer not to have to drive...

But for long distances, car is definitely the way to go. I hate flying - a necessary evil for time-constrained travel. Inter-city trains aren't really an option, and even if they are someday, they'll have to be both time and cost competitive, which will be tough. But if schedule were no concern... I love a good road trip. Plus, without a car, there'd be no way to hit up Wall Drug, the Corn Palace, the big ball of twine, and all of the other little oddities that make rural areas fun (joking, but I do like a brief detour for national parks, historic sites, etc... that's the whole point of inter-city travel, and not an option if you're on a bus).

Although, 5 hours doesn't get you too far from Denver. Try 15.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted May 2, 2012, 8:21 PM
Jonboy1983's Avatar
Jonboy1983 Jonboy1983 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The absolute western-most point of the Philadelphia urbanized area. :)
Posts: 1,410
Oh, if I had the choice, I'd take public transportation in a heartbeat. Since my job is nowhere near access to it, I have no choice but to drive. Work is only 10 minutes away tho. Still, when I worked as an intern for the City of Philadelphia, I drove from my home in Exton (at the time) and only went as far as the Exton SEPTA R5 station. I slept for another 50 minutes!!
__________________
Transportation planning, building better communities of tomorrow through superior connections between them today...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted May 2, 2012, 8:45 PM
papilgee4evaeva papilgee4evaeva is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 27
For intercity travel, I have no problem at all with driving. I'm one of those people who likes taking different routes to get places, coming and going on my own schedule, and stopping whenever I want or need to.

That, and many of my relatives don't live anywhere near a train station.

That also, and I remember my wife's stories about how she'd take Greyhound between where she was living and the college we went to. That's a four-hour drive at the most. Greyhound tripled that time.

Within a city or metro, I've driven, taken the bus, and ridden the rails. I'd do all three again.

Last edited by papilgee4evaeva; May 2, 2012 at 9:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
   
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:41 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.