HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise & Supertall Proposals

    

130 North Franklin in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum
            
View Full Map

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 23, 2012, 11:53 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
El Barto
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: California/Argentina
Posts: 2,010
Cool CHICAGO | 130 North Franklin | ~700 FT / ~213M | PRO



http://chicago.curbed.com/archives/2...-quicklink.php

Quote:
Back in April, we reported that the Crown Family, owner the old the Chicago Mercantile Exchange site, had teamed up with Tishman Speyer to develop the property with a one-million-square-foot office tower. We were encouraged that Krueck & Sexton, the firm behind the awarding-wining Spertus Institute on South Michigan Avenue, had been commissioned to design the building. Now, thanks to an article in the Sun-Times that includes a small, blink-and-you'll-miss-it rendering, we can peep the latest design. The building's height is encouraging as is the sleek blue facade, articulated with subtle indentations reminiscent of Spertus. No word as yet on potential tenants, though Google was rumored to be in the mix. A shiny new skyscraper at the long-vacant site would help redress past transgressions of the Crown family, which opted, amid bitter debate, to demolish the historic exchange building in 2002.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 3:05 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 2,795
Looks like hints of Spertus.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 3:11 AM
rgolch's Avatar
rgolch rgolch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 758
Quote:
Originally Posted by scalziand View Post
Looks like hints of Spertus.
Right you are, given that it was designed by the same firm.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 4:41 AM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,012
Not a bad looking building. Any chance it'll get a height increase? Or is this still in the planning stages.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 11:12 AM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
There is kind of a chess move aspect to this, because if/when this is built, it will become a little harder for the owners of the property to the N to build and market a tall Class A tower, as it would have no southern views to offer. Had the Crowns waited, they would be the ones with the tougher sell.

It's like the Crain's article from a couple weeks ago about Hines pulling the trigger on doing River Point on spec -- coming out of a recession, the first mover has a big advantage, and the last mover gets hosed.

Separately, I am still hoping 101 Wacker eventually gets torn down and replaced with a marquee skyscraper, which will also be somewhat harder due to 130 Franklin. Although it'll probably be the 2020s++ before we again see any Wacker towers getting demolished for bigger things (100 or 150 South may be earlier candidates, not to mention GGP).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 12:22 PM
Chicago_Forever's Avatar
Chicago_Forever Chicago_Forever is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chi-River North
Posts: 334
Yeah, GGP said they were looking to redevelope their proper and I was so excited to hear that news because I've always thought their currect HQ was a big waste of space for its prime location. Anyway, I beilieve they made that announcement over a year ago, I'm surprised there haven't been any kind of follow up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 2:52 PM
Chicagoguy Chicagoguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 572
Quote:
Originally Posted by scalziand View Post
Looks like hints of Spertus.
The first thing that came to mind when I saw this rendering was actually the Shangri-La Hotel and Residences in Toronto.

I can never remember how to upload a picture so here is the link!
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=148718
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 3:39 PM
lawfin lawfin is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by denizen467 View Post
There is kind of a chess move aspect to this, because if/when this is built, it will become a little harder for the owners of the property to the N to build and market a tall Class A tower, as it would have no southern views to offer. Had the Crowns waited, they would be the ones with the tougher sell.

It's like the Crain's article from a couple weeks ago about Hines pulling the trigger on doing River Point on spec -- coming out of a recession, the first mover has a big advantage, and the last mover gets hosed.

Separately, I am still hoping 101 Wacker eventually gets torn down and replaced with a marquee skyscraper, which will also be somewhat harder due to 130 Franklin. Although it'll probably be the 2020s++ before we again see any Wacker towers getting demolished for bigger things (100 or 150 South may be earlier candidates, not to mention GGP).
I don't know General Growth has to be one of the more underutilized and ugly buildings on Wacker......it is an fugly embarrassment.
I was walking east across the river at Randolph the other evening around 6ish and it appeared no one was inside general growth at all. I know they declared bankruptcy a while back but is the building still being used by them at all or by anyone.....literally saw no one inside... eerie

Oh sorry see that you mentioned GGP missed that on my first response
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 8:13 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,015




Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 8:30 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 10,341
Wow, that's nice
__________________
If God is your imaginary friend, so be it. But don't try to make him mine.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 8:31 PM
GregBear24 GregBear24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 176
I don't like this proposal....

I adore it!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 8:38 PM
Buckman821's Avatar
Buckman821 Buckman821 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 374
Damn, that is so nice it almost makes me rethink my somewhat hardcore preservationist stance.

Then again, by the time anything gets built here I'll guess the site has been vacant a dozen years and there are plenty of other places it could've gone.

In conclusion, the Crown family can still eat shit, but please build this tower also.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 9:00 PM
arkitekte's Avatar
arkitekte arkitekte is offline
Preds/Titans/Grizz
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 2,039
Thanks for posting the additional renderings! Looks really good.
__________________
I built it ground up. You bought it renovated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 9:28 PM
emathias's Avatar
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 3,072
That design definitely doesn't hurt my eyes to look at, but all the same I think it's kinda boring. That spot's been vacant so long, I would really have hoped to see something unusually creative proposed - especially from such famous owners.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 10:24 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Libertyville, IL
Posts: 10,341
^ Maybe the building will have images of faces on the side, spouting water? That sounds about right for the Crowns
__________________
If God is your imaginary friend, so be it. But don't try to make him mine.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 11:30 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
El Barto
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: California/Argentina
Posts: 2,010
Woah spyguy those renderings are great!

This is a good looking tower, I count about 50-52 floors, it's a bit hard to tell at the bottom, so hopefully it will break 700
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 11:34 PM
J. Will J. Will is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,885
I like the angulating facade, but it looks like it should be a little taller and thinner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted May 24, 2012, 11:53 PM
BraveNewWorld's Avatar
BraveNewWorld BraveNewWorld is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 316
Love it. This will be Chicago's 20th tallest building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted May 25, 2012, 2:53 AM
rgolch's Avatar
rgolch rgolch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 758
Very elegant. And it it seems like it will look a little different depending on what direction you looking at it, which great.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted May 25, 2012, 6:29 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 28,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
Very attractive.
__________________
Love NEW YORK?

Visit New York's icon. See the City of shores. Walk the Streets of Manhattan.
The evolving skyline, NY Skyscrapers & Construction
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Highrise & Supertall Proposals
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.