HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    77 Greenwich Street in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2014, 1:10 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is online now
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,674
Smile NEW YORK | 77 Greenwich (42 Trinity Place) | 500 FT | 35 FLOORS

Action heating up on Midtown South buildings


79 Greenwich Street, concept rendering by FXFOWLE


Very Large Rendering: https://thenypost.files.wordpress.co...nderings-2.jpg

Quote:
We also hear that Harmon, Spies and and Kevin Donner of Eastdil Secured were just hired to market the development site that includes the former Syms store at 42 Trinity Place in Lower Manhattan. Sitting west of Trinity Church, it also includes 67 Greenwich St. and 81 Greenwich St.

The trio was hired by former Forest City executive, Matthew Messinger, now CEO of Trinity Place Holding, which took over the assets of the failed discount retailer.

Architects FxFowle have already prepared a rendering to help market the site that can be developed as-of-right with a mixed-use building of roughly 300,000 square feet. Nearby, Time Equities is averaging $2,400 per square foot for its condominiums on West Street and the future buyer of this site could include condos and hotel or even office space along with street retail.
===============================
http://nypost.com/2014/12/17/action-...uth-buildings/
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2014, 1:38 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,260
What's the deal with leaving that last crappy little building facing Edgar? The site has some cool potential for creating a flatiron type design especially if it spanned over Edgar and included that little triangular island as part of the parcel.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2014, 3:55 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is online now
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,674
Yea I see your point. It is an eye sore. Zooming in on the large rendering, it becomes apparent. Hopefully they do something with that.
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2014, 4:52 AM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
What's the deal with leaving that last crappy little building facing Edgar? The site has some cool potential for creating a flatiron type design especially if it spanned over Edgar and included that little triangular island as part of the parcel.
Landmarked building.
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2014, 5:56 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by animatedmartian View Post
Landmarked building.
So keep it. Span over it. Integrate it in some way. It looks ridiculous sitting there like that.

I can see it actually partially inside a glass atrium of the new tower.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2015, 8:48 AM
Eidolon's Avatar
Eidolon Eidolon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 697
NEW YORK | 42 Trinity Place | 309m | 1015ft | 80 fl | Pro

http://www.yimbynews.com/2015/04/fir...-district.html


Quote:
Studio C Architects is behind the current images, which show the rough potential of the site’s future occupant. Plans have the building rising 80 stories and 1,015 feet, though another tipster notes the tower could go even higher.
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2015, 9:26 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,691
Just when you think Downtown can't get any crazier. But as I recall, there are between 3 or 4 msf of unused air rights in that area that can likely go to residential development. So we haven't seen the last of it yet.


This would form a nice sandwich of 125 Greenwich with 4 WTC.


__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2015, 12:20 PM
hunser's Avatar
hunser hunser is offline
don't *meddle*...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City / Wien
Posts: 4,016
Wow, that was unexpected! Also, it seems they can go even higher.

So we have 125 Greenwich, 80 South, the Broad St site and now this as four potential supertalls besides the WTC. Love it!

Last edited by hunser; Apr 8, 2015 at 12:30 PM.
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2015, 1:01 PM
sparkling's Avatar
sparkling sparkling is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 765
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
So keep it. Span over it. Integrate it in some way. It looks ridiculous sitting there like that.

I can see it actually partially inside a glass atrium of the new tower.

42 Trinity Place, image by Studio C Architects

It does not look that bad here, it can be a little cute buildings if renovated. Plus, the little structure that is currently in front of it is gone thus opening up the street
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2015, 1:05 PM
sparkling's Avatar
sparkling sparkling is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 765
Quote:
Originally Posted by hunser View Post
Wow, that was unexpected! Also, it seems they can go even higher.

So we have 125 Greenwich, 80 South, the Broad St site and now this as four potential supertalls besides the WTC. Love it!
There was some speculation that the garage right next to it would be razed and the site redeveloped but nothing has happened since. Yet, in due time we can get something there, too! More promising site is 111 Washington but doubt it would be a supertall

Last edited by sparkling; Apr 8, 2015 at 1:20 PM.
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2015, 3:32 PM
babybackribs2314 babybackribs2314 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UWS, Manhattan
Posts: 1,728
That garage will go eventually. This is in the early planning stages at the moment and I would pay attention to the massing not the design specifics. With over 1 MSF there is no reason this wouldn't be 1,250'+ IMO.
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2015, 10:36 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is online now
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,674
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2015, 10:38 PM
whiteford's Avatar
whiteford whiteford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,526
i love it. fantastic and absurdly narrow. that just makes it all the crazier. which means better of course. just great.
__________________
North Battleford!?!.... jeez how did this happen?
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2015, 1:09 AM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,529
wow i didnt see this one coming. is this the massive old syms store bldg site? i wondered what would happen to that, not surprised. if so, there are actually two small bldgs on one end of it + an empty lot on the corner of trinity pl & rector and then thrre is one small bldg on the other end of it.
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2015, 3:13 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
Yes.
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2015, 5:31 AM
Thefigman's Avatar
Thefigman Thefigman is offline
Not far from Disneyland
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Posts: 351
Love this!
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2015, 10:23 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,691
Now if someone could do a render of it with all of the planned towers in the area...
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2015, 2:32 PM
antinimby antinimby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In syndication
Posts: 2,098
This could be NY's boxy version of Chicago Trump Tower.
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2015, 3:40 PM
sparkling's Avatar
sparkling sparkling is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 765
The top 10 tallest NYC residential buildings: How does 42 Trinity Place stack up?

Brent Lomas
APRIL 9, 2015

Quote:
YIMBY’s first look at renderings for 42 Trinity Place got us wondering: Where does this new supertall building lie in the battle to be NYC’s most massive residence?

42 Trinity Place has come a long way since 2011. As the site of the old Syms store, it was once described as “comically depressing.” Now, new renderings show the building rising 80 stories and 1,015 feet. Theoretically, the site and plans could accommodate an even taller building. With Trinity Church releasing 600,000 square feet of extra air rights, the Financial District may end up with another building in excess of one million square feet.

This potential size for the new 42 Trinity Place is larger than any other primarily residential supertall building in development, except for Nordstrom Tower at 217 West 57th Street. 42 Trinity Place will be mixed-use, with current plans showing a two-story retail space, three floors for the Department of Education, 31 floors of hotel, and all higher floors residential. Trinity Place Holdings is the prospective developer.

Let’s take a look at 42 Trinity Place compared to its NYC supertall, residential cousins. This top 10 list includes residential buildings proposed, under construction and recently completed.
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2015, 7:01 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,691
^ The graphics are off, but it won't take long for One57 to fall far from the top.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:58 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.