HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2016, 8:21 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
I'm here for no one.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: My side of the fence
Posts: 6,107
Cool Austin | Block 71 | 542 Feet | 36 Floors | DEMO

I thought we already had a thread for Block 71, but I guess we've just been posting about it in the update thread. I'll start one since there are at least two proposals. This latest proposal is from Minguell-McQuary Architecture and looks to be 36-stories.



http://www.minguell-mcquary.com/block71/
__________________
Austin on Urban Planet:
http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/forum/215-austin/

Last edited by KevinFromTexas; Jul 29, 2017 at 3:06 AM. Reason: Added thread icon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2016, 8:28 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
I'm here for no one.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: My side of the fence
Posts: 6,107
Here's a re-post of deerhoof's photos of the Nelsen Partners proposal taken at the offices of Nelsen Partners.



http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...postcount=2710
__________________
Austin on Urban Planet:
http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/forum/215-austin/

Last edited by The ATX; Sep 19, 2016 at 9:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2016, 6:49 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 4,293
Please let the Nelsen Partners design be chosen. That other rendering is hideous. We can't afford to lose all of our unencumbered lots to stubby short buildings in the 30 floor range. Plus it looks like a strange version of the W.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2016, 6:52 PM
We vs us We vs us is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdawgboy View Post
Please let the Nelsen Partners design be chosen. That other rendering is hideous. We can't afford to lose all of our unencumbered lots to stubby short buildings in the 30 floor range. Plus it looks like a strange version of the W.
Only thing that rendering's missing is an Airstream trailer on one of those exposed balconies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2016, 6:59 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 4,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
Only thing that rendering's missing is an Airstream trailer on one of those exposed balconies.
I was about to edit my post to include 500 W 2nd lol

If the W and 500 W 2nd had a baby, that would be the outcome...

The only neat thing would be if they really included a forest within the highrise complex.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2016, 8:18 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
<----Virtual Planetoid
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: stuck in the middle with you
Posts: 45,538
I'm not a fan of that first one. The tower portion is too close to design of the W, and those recessed windows make it look like a parking garage. That portion of the building seriously looks like a re-purposed parking garage. I rarely say this about buildings, but this one is ugly.
__________________
i'm on my weekly world news garth brooks juice diet
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2016, 11:01 PM
Tech House Tech House is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 749
My biggest objection to the Minguell-McQuary proposal is that it isn't the Nelson proposal. What a terrible loss it would be, to not build what was previously envisioned, for which we got our hopes up. How can anyone not want the M-M building? What's wrong with our species that we would potentially pass on such an opportunity? I'm in a grief-stricken panic over this. [That might be a slight exaggeration.]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2016, 10:25 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
I'm here for no one.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: My side of the fence
Posts: 6,107
It looks like Trammell Crow is the winner. Paywall alert.

http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/ne...w-life-as.html
__________________
Austin on Urban Planet:
http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/forum/215-austin/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2016, 11:09 PM
SkyPie's Avatar
SkyPie SkyPie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 239
Happy about this quote from the ABJ article linked above, but I do hope they keep the entire building and not just the facade:

"The system has asked the company to maintain the south and west facades of Claudia Taylor Johnson Hall at the corner of Lavaca and Sixth, which was originally built as the city's seventh post office in 1914 and is named after President Lyndon Johnson's wife.

Otherwise, most of the block is likely to be demolished — including a parking garage, a nine-story tower and a plaza with a water fountain that hasn't run since a drought started affecting the city about 10 years ago."

Also this: "Tames says the redevelopment of Block 71, coupled with ground-floor retail in its new OneUTSystem tower, will better link that stretch of central downtown to entertainment districts to the east and west." It sounds like UT is actually making an attempt to be a good downtown citizen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2016, 11:30 PM
AustinGoesVertical AustinGoesVertical is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 439
Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
It looks like Trammell Crow is the winner. Paywall alert.

http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/ne...w-life-as.html
Any guesses on which design they will use? I'm crossing my fingers for the Nelson Partners one.

I wonder if this will get off the ground during this cycle. Buildings could be razed in 2017 at least.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2016, 12:50 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
I'm here for no one.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: My side of the fence
Posts: 6,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinGoesVertical View Post
Any guesses on which design they will use? I'm crossing my fingers for the Nelson Partners one.

I wonder if this will get off the ground during this cycle. Buildings could be razed in 2017 at least.
My guess is that it will be something completely different from the either of the two proposals we know about.
__________________
Austin on Urban Planet:
http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/forum/215-austin/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2016, 1:47 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
<----Virtual Planetoid
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: stuck in the middle with you
Posts: 45,538
The snippet from the article made it sound like it would be multiple buildings. I just hope that doesn't mean two 400 footers on the same lot. I'd rather see a single taller more slender tower than two.
__________________
i'm on my weekly world news garth brooks juice diet
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2016, 4:23 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
I'm here for no one.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: My side of the fence
Posts: 6,107
Someone other than the ABJ and their pay wall finally has the story. No building specifics yet, this is still a work in progress:

http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news...ntown-b/ns6Nk/
__________________
Austin on Urban Planet:
http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/forum/215-austin/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2016, 9:53 PM
MichaelB MichaelB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North edge of Downtown
Posts: 2,771
I'm more concenred that CTJ hall and the pocket park to the side remain in tack.
We will not affect the design.
Can affect the protection of CTJ and the park.
Debate away on the design!
I will prefer A-A because it repsects that history of CTJ hall and the public space and I think it is actully interesting and has potential. I like the depth in the surfaces as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2016, 10:34 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is online now
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 2,144
The lease will require them (Trammell) to preserve (at least) the south and west façade of the Claudia Taylor Johnson Hall. The plaza, however, is not protected in the lease.
__________________
Austin (City): 947,890 +19.93% - '10-'16 | Austin MSA (5 counties): 2,115,827 +23.28% - '10-'17
San Antonio (City): 1,492,510 +12.44% - '10-'16 | San Antonio MSA (8 counties): 2,473,974 +13.40% - '10-'17
AUS-SAT "CSA" (13 counties): 4,589,801 +18.94% - '10-'17 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Nov 15, 2016, 3:04 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
<----Virtual Planetoid
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: stuck in the middle with you
Posts: 45,538
This also mentions a new energy engineering building on campus.

http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/ne...gineering.html
Quote:
UT clears way for downtown tower, $160M engineering building

Nov 10, 2016, 2:59pm CST

The University of Texas System Board of Regents made a pair of pivotal decisions Thursday that will shape Austin for years to come.

The board approved spending $392 million from its endowment to build nine projects, including an Energy Engineering Building on the UT Austin campus. Regents also instructed system staff to negotiate a ground lease with Trammell Crow Co. to redevelop a downtown block on Sixth Street, turning it into dense mixed-use development that may help bridge the divide between two of Austin's most popular entertainment districts — East Sixth Street and West Sixth Street.

The engineering facility, which will receive $100 million from the endowment to help cover its estimated $160 million price tag, is the most pressing need in the $392 million list of capital projects. It is intended to raise the status of UT Austin's engineering program, which is already lauded as one of the nation's best.
__________________
i'm on my weekly world news garth brooks juice diet
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2017, 9:14 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
<----Virtual Planetoid
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: stuck in the middle with you
Posts: 45,538
A site location map was posted to the city's FTP site.

ftp://ftp.ci.austin.tx.us/ATD_AULCC/...0Blk_PLANS.pdf
__________________
i'm on my weekly world news garth brooks juice diet
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2017, 4:19 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
I'm here for no one.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: My side of the fence
Posts: 6,107
Based on the info in Kevin's link, there will be two towers.  Considering the info below from the permit filing and the size of the site, we're looking at a ~30-story apartment building and a ~40-story office building.

From the filing: 

"The Block 71 project will be developed on approximately 76,174 square feet (1.7487 acres) located at the property bound by Lavaca Street, Colorado Street, 6th Street and 7th Street in Austin, Travis County, Texas. The development will consist of high rise buildings with 236-unit apartment building, 665,000 square foot office building, and two (2) restaurants with on-site parking garage and utilities."
__________________
Austin on Urban Planet:
http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/forum/215-austin/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2017, 5:45 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio
Posts: 3,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
Based on the info in Kevin's link, there will be two towers.  Considering the info below from the permit filing and the size of the site, we're looking at a ~30-story apartment building and a ~40-story office building.

From the filing: 

"The Block 71 project will be developed on approximately 76,174 square feet (1.7487 acres) located at the property bound by Lavaca Street, Colorado Street, 6th Street and 7th Street in Austin, Travis County, Texas. The development will consist of high rise buildings with 236-unit apartment building, 665,000 square foot office building, and two (2) restaurants with on-site parking garage and utilities."
ftp://ftp.ci.austin.tx.us/ATD_AULCC/...216_Agenda.pdf

For those wondering, that comes from this document. There's more:

"Est. Construction Date: 06/01/2018 - 06/01/2020"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2017, 2:45 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 4,293
Well now we are getting somewhere. Potentially our first 40 story office tower is a pretty big deal. It won't be a 700 footer like we were hoping for (love the first rendering), but that would surely put the roof top of the tower into the 450 to 500 foot range. Frost is 33 floors, Kevin has better stats so correct me if I'm wrong but the 33rd floor sits right around the 400 foot mark. A 40 floor office tower would surely be at least 450 feet.

Less impressed with the 30 story counterpart. We just have so many in that range now as well as soon to be. 30 floors seems to be our defacto limit with many of the new towers.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:48 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.