HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Dec 4, 2003, 7:57 PM
JBinCalgary's Avatar
JBinCalgary JBinCalgary is offline
Original Member since '99
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,627
airport stats

anybody got last years airport passenger statistics
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Dec 4, 2003, 8:22 PM
rds70 rds70 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,915
I can't seem to find a comprehensive list, but you can check each airport for statistics.

Denver (DIA) - 2002 total = 35.65 million - 2003 projection = 37.25 million
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Dec 4, 2003, 8:37 PM
rds70 rds70 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,915
A few others I found:

ATL 2002 = 76.87 million
LAX 2002 = 65.22 million
SFO 2002 = 34.64 million
SLC 2002 = 18.66 million
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Dec 4, 2003, 8:40 PM
sleepy's Avatar
sleepy sleepy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: land of the hot dish
Posts: 2,348
Try this link:

http://www.airports.org/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Dec 4, 2003, 9:13 PM
Chi-town Chi-town is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UWS NYC
Posts: 8,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleepy
This data is for 2002 but whatever... here are some top tens:


Number of Passengers (Rank/City/Code/Passengers/Percent Change):

1 ATLANTA (ATL) 76,876,128 1.3
2 CHICAGO (ORD) 66,565,952 (1.3)
3 LONDON (LHR) 63,338,641 4.3
4 TOKYO (HND) 61,079,478 4.1
5 LOS ANGELES (LAX) 56,223,843 (8.7)
6 DALLAS/FT WORTH AIRPORT (DFW) 52,828,573 (4.2)
7 FRANKFURT/MAIN (FRA) 48,450,357 (0.2)
8 PARIS (CDG) 48,350,172 0.7
9 AMSTERDAM (AMS) 40,736,009 3.0
10 DENVER (DEN) 35,651,098 (1.2)


Aircraft Movements (Takeoffs & Landings):

1 CHICAGO (ORD) 922,817 1.2
2 ATLANTA (ATL) 889,966 (0.1)
3 DALLAS/FT WORTH AIRPORT (DFW) 765,109 (2.4)
4 LOS ANGELES (LAX) 645,424 (12.6)
5 PHOENIX (PHX) 545,771 (1.4)
6 PARIS (CDG) 510,098 ( 2.5)
7 MINNEAPOLIS/ST PAUL (MSP) 507,669 1.2
8 VAN NUYS (VNY) 498,477 9.1
9 LAS VEGAS (LAS) 496,845 0.6
10 DENVER (DEN) 494,834 2.2
__________________
"Architecture is the art of balancing values: economic, aesthetic, public, private. It always involves compromise, and few architects would deny that the client's desires take precedence. But the best architects understand that they also have an obligation to the public welfare, no matter who is paying their bills. That often means investing time in educating clients rather than simply acceding to their desires."

- Nicolai Ouroussoff, New York Times
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Dec 5, 2003, 9:08 PM
hudkina hudkina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,121
Wow, Detroit dropped from #6 in 2000 with 555,375 to #11 in 2002 with 490,885. And in 2003, it'll probably drop down to #13.

I wonder why it's dropping so fast over these last three years for movements.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Dec 5, 2003, 9:22 PM
UrbanUpstate
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wow, LAX is growing like crazy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted: Dec 5, 2003, 9:26 PM
Chi-town Chi-town is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UWS NYC
Posts: 8,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanUpstate
Wow, LAX is growing like crazy.
No, it's not. It's shrinking like crazy.

Numbers in parentheses indicate decreases. So LA's passenger total in 2002 was 8.7% lower than 2001. This is especially notable because 2001 was a bad year for the airline industry because of 9/11.
__________________
"Architecture is the art of balancing values: economic, aesthetic, public, private. It always involves compromise, and few architects would deny that the client's desires take precedence. But the best architects understand that they also have an obligation to the public welfare, no matter who is paying their bills. That often means investing time in educating clients rather than simply acceding to their desires."

- Nicolai Ouroussoff, New York Times
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted: Dec 5, 2003, 11:13 PM
Snowbird's Avatar
Snowbird Snowbird is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN Hometown: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,059
Here are the most recent full year stats for movements in the United States from the FAA:

October 2002 through September 2003

Rank Airport ........................ Total Movements
1) Chicago O'Hare ORD .................... 923578
2) Atlanta Hartsfield ATL .................. 895383
3) Dallas/Fort Worth DFW ................ 769574
4) Los Angeles Int'l. LAX .................. 630755
5) Phoenix Sky Harbor PHX .............. 593515
6) Denver Int'l. DEN ......................... 508156
7) Minneapolis/St.Paul MSP .............. 506808
8 ) Las Vegas McCarran LAS ............. 501612
9) Cincinnati CVG .............................. 496970
10) Detroit Wayne County DTW ........ 491075

There are still a couple of airports that haven't reported their October stats, otherwise these would have been even more recent.

As for more recent passenger numbers, the FAA doesn't keep real close track of that, and the stats that they do have are many months old and fragmented. So the ACI stats from last year on airports.org are the closest we can get.
__________________
Indianapolis
Latin and Greek for "Land of the Indians City" - American for "Multicultural Boomtown".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: Dec 5, 2003, 11:18 PM
DARRELL DARRELL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 506
The U.S. Dept of Transportation ranks airports based on # of boardings. I created a thread showing 2002 rankings for all U.S. airports where total boardings exceed 1,000,000.
__________________
San Antonio Texas
Metro Pop. 1,900,000
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted: Dec 6, 2003, 1:52 AM
chiphile's Avatar
chiphile chiphile is offline
bring home the olympics!
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: chicago
Posts: 402
Just some bragging that chi people like to do...

O'Hare's peak hours are between 5 am and 11 pm, where most if not all flights occurr. So that's 923,578 movements a year, which if the math is done right..

approx.

3,028 flights per day

168 flights per hour

about 3 movements per minute...

ONE takeoff or landing every 20 seconds.


And that sounds just about right, stand anywhere within the vicinity of O'Hare where you can catch a glimpse of more than one runway, and see the spectacle for yourself... quite a sight, I enjoy it everytime.

Would anyone have a pic of a landing stack? (where you can see 5 or so planes in a single file line coming in to land) They make great pictures during the evening when you can see their lights, I can't find anything good on airliners.net
__________________
www.itsthesearstower.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted: Dec 6, 2003, 1:59 AM
Chicago103's Avatar
Chicago103 Chicago103 is offline
Future Mayor of Chicago
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,977
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-town
8 VAN NUYS (VNY) 498,477 9.1
Is Van Nuys in LA even a commercial airport?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted: Dec 6, 2003, 3:48 AM
Snowbird's Avatar
Snowbird Snowbird is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN Hometown: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,059
^^^ No. General aviation only.
__________________
Indianapolis
Latin and Greek for "Land of the Indians City" - American for "Multicultural Boomtown".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted: Dec 6, 2003, 5:08 AM
urbanflyer's Avatar
urbanflyer urbanflyer is offline
Ku`u Lei
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 名古屋
Posts: 6,373
Van Nuys is the busiest general aviation field in the world.

And a note on Tokyo's ranking - that's not the international airport, Narita. Those numbers are comprised entirely of Haneda, Tokyo's domestic facility.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted: Dec 6, 2003, 5:46 AM
Chi-town Chi-town is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UWS NYC
Posts: 8,264
You really have to use both rankings, IMO.

On the one hand, judging by movements alone is a bad idea because airports like Van Nuys, which are very busy with small aircraft and private planes, rank highly, even though they're not "major" airports in the sense of being important. On the other hand, judging by passengers alone is a bad idea because it disregards the massive amounts of air freight that pass through airports. If an airport like O'Hare didn't have that kind of drain on its airspace, it would likely be able to handle more passengers at lower cost. In addition, it's biased towards coastal cities where more long haul (read: big planes) flights originate, and against stopover airports & hubs which form just as important a part of the air travel network.

Fundamentally speaking, both fit the definition of "business". In terms of how crowded the terminals are, and how many people pass through an airport in a given day, passenger numbers are the determining factor. In terms of the amount of activity at the airport, how busy the guys in the tower are, and just how much stuff is going on, takeoffs & landings are the important factor.

For all intents as purposes, I consider ATL and ORD "tied" as the busiest airports in the world.
__________________
"Architecture is the art of balancing values: economic, aesthetic, public, private. It always involves compromise, and few architects would deny that the client's desires take precedence. But the best architects understand that they also have an obligation to the public welfare, no matter who is paying their bills. That often means investing time in educating clients rather than simply acceding to their desires."

- Nicolai Ouroussoff, New York Times
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:35 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.