HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 2:18 PM
CypressClinton CypressClinton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 37
Amazon plans $5 billion second headquarters in North America

Amazon said Thursday it plans to open another headquarters in North America and spend more than $5 billion for its construction and operation.

The company, based in Seattle, said it has yet to zero in on a location but expects to expand the new headquarters to include up to 50,000 high-paying jobs.

Amazon said its new headquarters should be located in a metropolitan area with more than 1 million people and one that can attract and retain technical talent.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/compa...WTQ?li=BBnbfcL

This is really important news. Amazon has been huge for Seattle and could have a similar effect on another city. I hate to start a city v. city thread but my personal choices would be Chicago (old post office) or Philadelphia (Schuylkill Yards) but can also see big corporate cities like Atlanta, Dallas, Detroit, and Boston in the mix as well.
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 2:42 PM
CIA CIA is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,552
It will be interesting to see what kind of economic development incentives are thrown at Amazon by competing municipalities.
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 2:42 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 17,766
Yeah everyone is talking about this now. If they put 50,000 jobs into a downtown somewhere it will be huge for whatever city that is.

Personally, I expect they'll pick a US city east of the Mississippi, in the >3 million range. It has to have a good airport and a good large university nearby. I'd love to see them go to Detroit, but I predict they'll take a city that's already on the cusp and push it into superstardom. Philly or Pittsburgh. Maybe Atlanta.
__________________
BeyondDC: blog | twitter | flickr | instagram | Exploring urbanism and transportation in the Washington, DC area.
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 3:17 PM
initiald's Avatar
initiald initiald is offline
Oak City
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 4,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
Yeah everyone is talking about this now. If they put 50,000 jobs into a downtown somewhere it will be huge for whatever city that is.

Personally, I expect they'll pick a US city east of the Mississippi, in the >3 million range. It has to have a good airport and a good large university nearby. I'd love to see them go to Detroit, but I predict they'll take a city that's already on the cusp and push it into superstardom. Philly or Pittsburgh. Maybe Atlanta.
Rumor here is that the Research Triangle (Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill) area is high on the list. 2.2 million CSA and growing fast, major research universities (Duke, UNC, NC State), one of the most educated places (% degree holders and % of post-grad degrees), good interstates and international airport with several Europe non-stops, other major tech firms here (Lenovo, Citrix, SAS, Cisco, Red Hat, etc.)
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 3:23 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago/New York
Posts: 2,316
I hate this type of corporate welfare and hope that Amazon picks the best city for their needs not whatever city/state offers the largest incentive package.
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 3:24 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
1000 µg = 2D Mandelbrot
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: New Jersey - Somerset County
Posts: 22,474
Philly would be a nice choice IMO.

I'd rather see it in a core of a city in a walkable or transit friendly location compared to somewhere outside the city-limits, in nearby burbs. People forget that 20,000 new commuters or in this case up to and exceeding 50k can really destroy certain highways. Thats a lot of extra cars.

Or, an alternative... Delaware? Wilmington? Could be good talent wise to attract tri-state or DC type talent. Not much of a move if relocations concerned. Plus it could really help a very cute, small-sized city grow and as a catalyst for future growth.
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 3:46 PM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is online now
Registered Putz
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 22,326
The Research Triangle in NC does seem like a natural choice due to all the reasons initiald stated. The state was also pretty quick to repeal that bathroom bill so maybe they know more than what they're letting on.
__________________
Castigat ridendo mores
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 3:55 PM
CherryCreek's Avatar
CherryCreek CherryCreek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 543
Amazon Hq2 - And the Nominees are . . . .

The competition for the MASSIVE Amazon HQ2 is on:

http://www.businesswire.com/news/hom...3-Headquarters

Let the nominations begin!

I vote Denver!!

There's been talk of Re-developing the huge amusement park and surrounding parking lots right next to Downtown, light rail, with Airport rail nearby.

http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/...re-id464281782

Last edited by KevinFromTexas; Sep 8, 2017 at 6:36 PM. Reason: Photo was not credited with source link
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 4:01 PM
CypressClinton CypressClinton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 37
HMMMMM why was my original thread deleted????
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 4:09 PM
bnk's Avatar
bnk bnk is online now
પટેલ. કે ન
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 9,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
Yeah everyone is talking about this now. If they put 50,000 jobs into a downtown somewhere it will be huge for whatever city that is.

Personally, I expect they'll pick a US city east of the Mississippi, in the >3 million range. It has to have a good airport and a good large university nearby. I'd love to see them go to Detroit, but I predict they'll take a city that's already on the cusp and push it into superstardom. Philly or Pittsburgh. Maybe Atlanta.
That sounds like Chicago. Very liberal CEO. I'm ruling out states that went Trump.
__________________
facebook
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 4:12 PM
woodrow woodrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 648
My guess for finalists, in no particular order -

1. DC-VA-MD
2. Chicago
3. Dallas
4. Atlanta
5. Detroit (dark horse contender)
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 4:24 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,023
Wonder why they mention North America and not just the US. They might be leaving their options open to expand into Canada (they have been a huge presence recently in office expansion in Vancouver) given the political situation in the States and the difficultly obtaining work visas for foreign workers. The numbers being thrown out are probably best case scenario but still massively impressive for whichever city lands this. And I concur, hope they go with the best city and not the one that offers the most incentives.
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 4:25 PM
CherryCreek's Avatar
CherryCreek CherryCreek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 543
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodrow View Post
My guess for finalists, in no particular order -

1. DC-VA-MD
2. Chicago
3. Dallas
4. Atlanta
5. Detroit (dark horse contender)

I do wonder whether there will a "preference" to go east or south, given their current Hq1 in Seattle.
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 4:26 PM
JMKeynes's Avatar
JMKeynes JMKeynes is online now
In the long run...
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 538
I think that Bezos will want the second HQ on the east coast.

I think the top contenders are:

NY (Bezos has an apartment there; financial capital of the world; unparalleled access to Europe and Middle East; lots of tech talent, including, Columbia and the new Tech Center). Amazon bought the building on 34th St and is building a huge new facility on SI. This is tailor-made for NY.

Boston (great tech talent)

Atlanta, Dallas, and Chicago will offer enormous incentives.
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 4:39 PM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 15,775
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
Wonder why they mention North America and not just the US. They might be leaving their options open to expand into Canada (they have been a huge presence recently in office expansion in Vancouver) given the political situation in the States and the difficultly obtaining work visas for foreign workers.
Vancouver would seem to be extremely unlikely given insane housing costs and proximity to Seattle. Probably the least likely major metro.

And I doubt Amazon would make long-range plans based on a short-term problem (Trump).
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 4:48 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago/New York
Posts: 2,316
A friend of mine who worked for Amazon in Seattle for many years predicts Ohio. My bias requires me to root for Chicago, but not if it means giving them a ridiculous incentive package like what Foxconn got. I agree that it will be east of the Mississippi and since they said North America instead of the United States you can't rule out Toronto or Montreal, although I would think that is unlikely.
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 5:06 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The Miami of Canada
Posts: 18,974
i think eastern half of the nation is probably correct.

50,000 jobs is a stupid large number, only the biggest metros will be able to adequately supply that many people.

my best guesses: NYC, boston, philly, DC, chicago, detroit, atlanta, dallas, houston
__________________
He has to go.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Sep 7, 2017 at 5:37 PM.
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 5:13 PM
AbortedWalrus AbortedWalrus is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 163
Here in Philly would be pretty perfect.

The Navy Yard literally ticks every box of their requirements:
30 Mile proximity to population center: It's IN the city.
45 Minute proximity to international airport: It's about 15 minutes drive from the airport, or you can take mass transit.
1-2 Miles from Major highways: It sits basically ON I-95
Close to Major arterial roads: Within 10 minutes of 295, NJ Turnpike, I-76
Access to mass transit at site: Bus routes to site, subway stop a 5 minute shuttle ride from site
500,000 sqft of development space: Currently prepped for 4,000,000 sqft of office development, shovel ready
Up to 8,000,000 Sq Ft of Development space beyond 2027: 13.5 Million square feet of space at full build out.

Literally every box ticked, in a Keystone Opportunity Zone tax haven. The city could justify a BSL expansion to the Navy Yard with this sort of development, so they could throw that in as a deal sweetener.
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 5:16 PM
lio45 lio45 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lévis, QC
Posts: 19,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by bnk View Post
That sounds like Chicago. Very liberal CEO. I'm ruling out states that went Trump.
You can't seriously believe that it's rational to immediately reduce the list of Milwaukee, Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Philly to one single contender by such an arbitrary criterion.
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2017, 5:28 PM
k1052 k1052 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,257
Just looking at the breakdown of talent they want I think it has to be a huge metro like Atlanta/Chicago/Dallas/Philly/DC. Engineers, executives, legal, accounting, etc. They need everything and a lot of it. I don't think any of the mid-tier cities could fulfill those requirements not to mention the non-trivial challenge of having enough space for 50K people in 10 years without causing a housing crisis like they've already done in Seattle.

I think Boston is a nope because of size. NYC probably too expensive and time will be a problem.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:50 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.