HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > SSP: Local London > Projects & Construction Updates

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Mar 2, 2011, 4:37 PM
QuantumLeap QuantumLeap is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 206
1235-1253 Richmond Street | ? | 18s | Proposed

New development proposed near UWO (and several other high rises)

4:30 p.m. - 1235,1237,1245,1247,1253 Richmond Street - The proposed amendment is to facilitate the development of an 18-storey apartment building with a total of 311 two-bedroom units and 183 parking spaces. Possible amendment to the Zoning By-law Z.-1 FROM a Residential R9 (R9-7-H45) Zone which permits a range of residential and specialized apartment buildings as well as lodging houses up to a maximum height of 45m and a maximum density of 150 units per hectare (1235,1237,1245,1247 Richmond Street) AND a Residential R9 (R9-7-H50) Zone which permits a range of residential and specialized apartment buildings as well as lodging houses up to a maximum height of 50m and a maximum density of 150 units per hectare (1253 Richmond Street) TO a Residential R9 Bonus (R9-H45-B-( )) Zone to permit a maximum height of 55m and maximum density of 450 units per hectare with reductions in the minimum front yard depth; minimum rear yard depth; minimum interior side yard depth; maximum lot coverage; and, minimum parking space requirements.
File: Z-7856 Planner: Michael Tomazincic (Dundas)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Mar 2, 2011, 4:43 PM
QuantumLeap QuantumLeap is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 206
A real luxury
Proposed student apartments will be furnished 'upper class' suites
November 24, 2010
By Monica Blaylock

Tanning beds, a lounge and bar, a rooftop patio with a fireplace, a 24-hour gym — the Western stereotype just died and went to heaven.

On Monday night, Abode Varsity Living held a neighbourhood open house to gain feedback from the community about their proposed luxury student apartment building, set to be built on Richmond Street, north of campus main gates.

The apartment building would house upper-year students in fully furnished, two-bedroom apartments with luxury amenities.

“The neighborhood was more optimistic about this than I’d seen in almost any other project,” Nancy Branscombe, Ward 6 councillor for the city of London, said.

“It will help relieve some of the pressure by taking some students out of the areas where they are now, and obviously that’s part of the ongoing issues that we have [with student housing],” she continued, referring to the problem of overpopulated student neighbourhoods that often gather noise complaints and attract the attention of London police.

However, hopes that the new building will relieve pressure from student areas might be jumping the gun, according to some students at the meeting.

The cost of luxury living will likely be too high for most students who currently reside in the student housing areas around campus, according to Brandon Sousa, external affairs co-ordinator for the University Students’ Council .

“If students want to live there, they better hope their OSAP pays up. No way this rent is going to be any cheaper than 800 bucks a student,” Sousa said.

“It’s tailoring to a very small, select market of upper-class students — the ones who don’t have to worry about tuition or student loans,” Sousa continued. He noted a building with such niche clientele could risk reinforcing Western’s image as a well-to-do party school.

Sousa noted a spokesperson for the building’s development could not reveal the rental prices per unit at the town hall, but told members of the USC to look at other luxury student housing in the area for sample pricing.

Pat Searle, municipal affairs commissioner for the USC, noted Western is already struggling to find affordable housing near campus for students. He said a luxury apartment might make that worse.

“Is there really that big of a demand for this type of housing?” Searle said.

“I know there’s a demand for housing near campus, but is it right that they specialize in luxury apartments when [the USC] is concerned with finding students affordable housing?” Searle continued.

Branscombe said the new building likely won’t be geared toward first-year students.

“They’re looking to attract upper year students, which I’m not sure can be guaranteed, even with all the fancy trimmings,” she said.

She also said the town hall meeting brought some new ideas for how to develop the space, including a taxi stand so cabs wouldn’t have to turn around on Richmond Street.

“The developers are going to look at some of the good suggestions coming out of the meeting,” she said. “It was generally well-received.”

Abode Varsity Living is in the process of building two other luxury apartments — one near Wilfred Laurier University and Waterloo University, and the other near Guelph University. They could not be reached for comment by press time.

“They do own the land, and it’s pre-zoned for a high-density residential. So they can build an apartment building there already,” Branscombe said of the London location.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Mar 2, 2011, 6:31 PM
ForestryW's Avatar
ForestryW ForestryW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 307
Luxury student housing. The same sort of thing popping up here around UW/WLU.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Mar 2, 2011, 8:11 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Liver & Onions
Posts: 18,550
not surprising. UWO is lifting the cap on undergrad student enrollment.
__________________
There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. -Donald Rumsfeld
Didn't you notice on the plane when you started talking, eventually I started reading the vomit bag?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Mar 3, 2011, 3:19 AM
bolognium's Avatar
bolognium bolognium is offline
bro
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Nouveau London
Posts: 367
Can't really see this taking a load off of the student ghettos surrounding UWO. Usually when 5+ students live in the same house it's because they can't afford a more private, pricey apartment.

PARRRRTY!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Mar 3, 2011, 2:00 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Liver & Onions
Posts: 18,550
Some refer to UWO as the University of Wealthy Ontarians.
True, I am sure, that most students don't fit the bill, but quite a few do (see student rolling stock for evidence...compare that to my alma mater school of hard-knocks)
__________________
There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. -Donald Rumsfeld
Didn't you notice on the plane when you started talking, eventually I started reading the vomit bag?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Mar 3, 2011, 3:59 PM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is offline
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 1,352
Sooo jealous of all those rich kids... Their mommys and daddys send em from Richmond Hill to some of the best off-campus residences around UWO.

Problem is I don't think they know how to ride a bus. It's funny to see these people on the LTC if they can't drive. They fight for their life if standing or absolutely refuse to let anyone sit next to them if they are seated.

Ok enough rich kid bashing. I live at home to save money... if not I'd be in one of those student ghettos with OSAP and debt up the wazzoo. Don't want that if I can avoid it.
__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted: Mar 3, 2011, 5:36 PM
ForestryW's Avatar
ForestryW ForestryW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by haljackey View Post
Ok enough rich kid bashing. I live at home to save money... if not I'd be in one of those student ghettos with OSAP and debt up the wazzoo. Don't want that if I can avoid it.
Ahem. Welcome to my life.

Just be happy London is only getting ONE luxury student highrise. Waterloo already has plenty of those and it's getting worse.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted: Mar 9, 2011, 10:37 PM
FazDeH's Avatar
FazDeH FazDeH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 207
London already has "Luxury Student Apartment buildings" They're just down the street from me, 695 and 675 Richmond. I would venture a guess that the percentage of students living in both is well above 80%
And it amazes me that they all have the same uniform. Sweatpants, a Canada Goose jacket and some sun glasses (Even on cloudy days)
There is a niche for this sort of housing in London, but lets call a spade a spade, it's just a way for the developer to make some serious cash because these kids have parents who don't mind spending $1000 a month in rent. This will have absolutely zero impact on the student population as a whole, but I'm not apposed to more 18+ buildings in the city.
__________________
Number of buildings listed on SSPs Diagram section? 191
Number of people living in the cities metro area? 496,900
Knowing London has a better looking skyline than that of any other city our size? PRICELESS
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: Mar 9, 2011, 11:58 PM
Simpseatles's Avatar
Simpseatles Simpseatles is offline
Wannabe Urbanite
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 651
Despite the reasoning behind this development, I'm not apposed to getting a new 55m tower in the city!
__________________
"Sometimes I wonder if the world's so small, that we can never get away from the sprawl.
Living in the sprawl the dead shopping malls rise like mountains beyond mountains and there's no end in sight." -Arcade Fire
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2011, 12:48 AM
new age new age is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 76
The addresses listed are prewar era homes that could be redeveloped into townhouses or condos while keeping the existing buildings. I am rarely opposed to infill development but at the cost of viable historic buildings. The problem with this building is there are 4 floor walk-up commie blocks just a few doors down that could be redeveloped. These new building could be integrated into the street scape instead of set so far back.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2011, 1:31 PM
jcollins jcollins is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 1,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by van Hemessen View Post
Luxury student housing. The same sort of thing popping up here around UW/WLU.
Where? I see nothing but 5 bedroom student only buildings that arent really "luxury"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2011, 4:18 PM
ForestryW's Avatar
ForestryW ForestryW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Posts: 307
I suppose that depends on your idea of "luxury" but I can think of at least three buildings on King St and one on Columbia that were marketed as such and many other $700/room buildings, though they may not be "real" luxury.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted: Mar 10, 2011, 6:15 PM
MrSlippery519 MrSlippery519 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by FazDeH View Post
London already has "Luxury Student Apartment buildings" They're just down the street from me, 695 and 675 Richmond. I would venture a guess that the percentage of students living in both is well above 80%
And it amazes me that they all have the same uniform. Sweatpants, a Canada Goose jacket and some sun glasses (Even on cloudy days)
There is a niche for this sort of housing in London, but lets call a spade a spade, it's just a way for the developer to make some serious cash because these kids have parents who don't mind spending $1000 a month in rent. This will have absolutely zero impact on the student population as a whole, but I'm not apposed to more 18+ buildings in the city.
That is exactly how I am looking at it...if there is a market and people are willing to pay there is no question this should be built. As you mentioned there is a market this is already known.

Add in the fact it will also bring a couple nice 18+ buildings and it seems like a no braining.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted: Apr 6, 2011, 11:13 PM
Simpseatles's Avatar
Simpseatles Simpseatles is offline
Wannabe Urbanite
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 651
I've got a render, that was posted by London1 at Love London.



http://www.lovelondon.ca/showthread....18-fl-Proposed
__________________
"Sometimes I wonder if the world's so small, that we can never get away from the sprawl.
Living in the sprawl the dead shopping malls rise like mountains beyond mountains and there's no end in sight." -Arcade Fire
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted: Apr 7, 2011, 1:33 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Liver & Onions
Posts: 18,550
^no. there is little exposed concrete. where is the stucco? All buildings in London must be exposed concrete/stucco!
__________________
There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. -Donald Rumsfeld
Didn't you notice on the plane when you started talking, eventually I started reading the vomit bag?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted: Apr 7, 2011, 2:24 PM
MrSlippery519 MrSlippery519 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 351
Wow that render looks incredible...lets hope that is what the final building looks like.

Molson...no more stucco!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted: Apr 7, 2011, 7:58 PM
FazDeH's Avatar
FazDeH FazDeH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 207
Wow- very West Coast Seattle lookin'. 50/50 it doesn't look at all like this when finished though. Some of us old timers might remember that City place initially looked pretty good too... annnnnd well Molson must be happy with the end result.
__________________
Number of buildings listed on SSPs Diagram section? 191
Number of people living in the cities metro area? 496,900
Knowing London has a better looking skyline than that of any other city our size? PRICELESS
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted: Oct 13, 2011, 11:35 PM
QuantumLeap QuantumLeap is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 206
Does anything know about what is going on with this particular application?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted: Oct 13, 2011, 11:54 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Liver & Onions
Posts: 18,550
Farhi is trying to get the city to pay for it
__________________
There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. -Donald Rumsfeld
Didn't you notice on the plane when you started talking, eventually I started reading the vomit bag?
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > SSP: Local London > Projects & Construction Updates
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:59 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.