HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum.

Since 1999, SkyscraperPage.com's forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web.  The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.  SkyscraperPage.com also features unique skyscraper diagrams, a database of construction activity, and publishes popular skyscraper posters.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted: Oct 1, 2005, 3:39 AM
#10 Shirt #10 Shirt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 81
Soccer Stadium boom in the U.S.

Ok, maybe "boom" is going too far, but it's nice to see so many teams moving into venues that allow them to become profitable (not renting out NFL stadiums) and provide a nice, intimate atmosphere.

The stadium that started it all: Columbus Crew Stadium - 22,500 - 1999


The Home Depot Center
Teams: LA Galaxy and Chivas USA
Capacity: 27,000
Built: 2003







Pizza Hut Park
Team: FC Dallas
Capacity: 21,193
Built: 2005




Bridgeview Stadium (naming sponsor TBA..likely LaSalle Bank)
Team: Chicago Fire
Capacity: 20,000
Under Construction








Harrison Stadium (naming sponsor TBA)
Team: Metrostars
Capacity: 20,000
Completion in 2007






Earlier design


Colorado Rapids Stadium (naming sponsor TBA)
Team: Colorado Rapids
Capacity: 20,000
Completion in 2007






Also worth mentioning...

Rochester (USL, "minor league" team) has a 12,000 seat stadium u/c right now.




None of them are exactly cutting edge design, but they mark a significant point in the story of professional soccer in the U.S.

It should also be noted that they are all designed with expansion in mind (in the open ends, additional upper decks, or temporary seating on the stage ends).

New stadiums are also being planned in Salt Lake and D.C., but nothing has been finalized.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted: Oct 1, 2005, 5:22 PM
phillyskyline's Avatar
phillyskyline phillyskyline is offline
Monomania w/ Skyscrapers
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In the sky with other skyscrapers
Posts: 2,328
Thanx for the pics... out of curiousity which field is the largest on the east coast?
__________________
"OK gang, you know the rules, no humping, no licking, no sniffing hineys."
Harry Dunne
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted: Oct 1, 2005, 8:36 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
Coastal elitist
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 15,341
DC is also looking to build a soccer specific stadium in Poplar Point, but it's still in the planning stages. It would likely have a capacity of 24,000.
__________________
BeyondDC: twitter | flickr | blog | Exploring urbanism and transportation in the Washington, DC area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted: Oct 3, 2005, 5:24 PM
yarabundi's Avatar
yarabundi yarabundi is offline
Homo Platoregimontis
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montréal
Posts: 3,291
Montréal also has a soccer stadium announced earlier this year. Sponsor will be local cheese company : Saputo. It'll have 15K seats - not much considering tne extreme popularity of this sport here but it'll be better than nothing.
__________________
"Je suis contre les femmes...tout contre !!"
Sacha Guitry

Come to see our SC4 cities at http://www.toutsimcity.com/forums/af....php?forum=vil
or here : http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=117089
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted: Oct 13, 2005, 5:21 AM
#10 Shirt #10 Shirt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 81
RSL's new stadium in Sandy, Utah. (Just announced today.)
Capacity: 25,000
Groundbreaking spring '06




Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted: Oct 14, 2005, 1:15 PM
ThrashATL's Avatar
ThrashATL ThrashATL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,803
Kansas City Wizards are looking at a 22,000 seat stadium in suburban Johnson County, KS. They're currently in the cavernous 78,000 seat Arrowhead Stadium:



Atlanta is also considering a 25,000 seat soccer stadium for a possible MLS expansion team. The current Atlanta USL team is also building it's own stadium as well.
__________________
We met at Starbucks. Not at the same Starbucks but we saw each other at different Starbucks across the street from each other.

Last edited by ThrashATL; Oct 14, 2005 at 1:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted: Dec 16, 2005, 7:20 PM
looper121's Avatar
looper121 looper121 is offline
Register This
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Phila
Posts: 349
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThrashATL
Kansas City Wizards are looking at a 22,000 seat stadium in suburban Johnson County, KS. They're currently in the cavernous 78,000 seat Arrowhead Stadium:



Atlanta is also considering a 25,000 seat soccer stadium for a possible MLS expansion team. The current Atlanta USL team is also building it's own stadium as well.
Hmmm, maybe. These 2 cities aren't likely to have these stadiums any time soon...First of all, KC may lose it's team in the next year, they were only just given another year in KC days ago. It isn't looking good for them as the average attendance isn't where Lamar Hunt wants it. and yes, having them play in Arrowhead is terrible. Atlanta won't have an MLS team for some time, as you posted a USL stadium is in the works...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted: Dec 22, 2005, 6:14 PM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
I've got a bad reputation
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 22,486
Rochester should be added to the MLS... they've lobbied for years.. that city is crazy for soccer and now they have a wonderful new stadium.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted: Dec 23, 2005, 11:23 PM
Raraavis's Avatar
Raraavis Raraavis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Omaha
Posts: 1,596
And College Soccer Stadiums as well


Creighton University Soccer Stadium
Downtown Omaha Nebraska

__________________
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.

-Galileo Galilei

Last edited by Raraavis; Jun 5, 2007 at 3:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted: Dec 23, 2005, 11:33 PM
tuy's Avatar
tuy tuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 3,084
And, even though San Jose just lost the Quakes, they are talking about building a new stadium for an expansion team. They have retained the rights to the team name.
__________________
Current Metro - Stockton 679,687 Jan, 2007 CADOF Estimate
Current City - Tracy 80,505 Jan, 2007 CADOF Estimate
Former Metros - Kansas City, Cleveland/Akron, Omaha, Lincoln, Dallas/Ft. Worth
Travelled to 19 Countries on Six Continents
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted: Jan 4, 2006, 7:24 AM
Alta California Alta California is offline
405 Trainer
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 437
What's behind these boom in soccer stadium construction, especially in pretty whitebread places. It can't be the MLS. Though this would be an awesome asset if the States bid for the FIFA World Cup.
__________________
"We aren't at war with Iraq either. We didn't go to war with Iraq and it hasn't existed in 4 years.."
--Chicago3rd
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2006, 12:28 AM
Trantor's Avatar
Trantor Trantor is offline
FUS RO DAH!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Ecumenopolis
Posts: 13,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alta California
What's behind these boom in soccer stadium construction, especially in pretty whitebread places. It can't be the MLS. Though this would be an awesome asset if the States bid for the FIFA World Cup.
Sorry to inform you pal, but World Cup stadiums must hold at least 40.000 people in seats.

Anyway, USA has no chance of hosting another World Cup in the next 30 years at least, since it hosted in 1994. The WC, unlike the Olympics, doesnt pay so much attention for money of the host country.

2006 - Germany
2010 - South Africa
2014 - a South American country (100%), probably Brasil (90%), which only hosted the World Cup in 1950 but won it 5 times
2018 - much probably an European country
2022 - I would guess an asian country
2026 - maybe another european country, maybe a South American country (Argentina?), maybe a north american country (Mexico?)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2006, 1:26 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 8,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trantor
Sorry to inform you pal, but World Cup stadiums must hold at least 40.000 people in seats.

Anyway, USA has no chance of hosting another World Cup in the next 30 years at least, since it hosted in 1994.

The WC, unlike the Olympics, doesnt pay so much attention for money of the host country.
there are plenty of suitable stadia larger than 40 000 in the states...and if it were not true about FIFA paying attention to the money of the host country, then the U.S would have never hosted it in the first place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2006, 1:37 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 8,779
vancouver montreal and toronto are buildng soccer specific stadia as well.....the toronto one is in preparation of the 2007 FIFA World Youth Championship


vancouver:







[/QUOTE]


montreal:

[/QUOTE]


a previous version of the toronto one:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2006, 1:54 AM
Markitect Markitect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,481
There is a group of investors trying to land a Major League Soccer franchise in Milwaukee, as well. So far they have a loose proposal for a mixed-use development (retail, hotel, offices, residential) with a soccer-specific stadium (20,000 seats or so) as the centerpiece. They have been pushing for the project to be located right Downtown, though a specific site has not yet been identified. Designs for different sites have been ongoing for several months now, but it's all behind-closed-doors type of stuff at the moment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2006, 5:58 AM
CTroyMathis CTroyMathis is offline
Sea™
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas.TX Previously:New London.CT/Portsmouth.NH
Posts: 3,248
I'm diggin' that Vancouver stadium.
__________________
Retired from the USN Submarine Service.
DallasMetropolis.com | 1997-2012
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2006, 6:07 AM
tuy's Avatar
tuy tuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 3,084
With all the interest in building Soccer only stadiums. Look for the MLS to expand. San Jose is already promised a future expansion team. By how many teams do you all think the MLS should expand?
__________________
Current Metro - Stockton 679,687 Jan, 2007 CADOF Estimate
Current City - Tracy 80,505 Jan, 2007 CADOF Estimate
Former Metros - Kansas City, Cleveland/Akron, Omaha, Lincoln, Dallas/Ft. Worth
Travelled to 19 Countries on Six Continents
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2006, 2:56 PM
Trantor's Avatar
Trantor Trantor is offline
FUS RO DAH!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Ecumenopolis
Posts: 13,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking
there are plenty of suitable stadia larger than 40 000 in the states...and if it were not true about FIFA paying attention to the money of the host country, then the U.S would have never hosted it in the first place.
yes, but NONE is one of these "boom" stadiums. ANd you were talking about THESE stadiums shown here being a major asset.

US hosted the WC because FIFA wanted to promote the sport in US, not because USA had money to realize the WC.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2006, 2:58 PM
Trantor's Avatar
Trantor Trantor is offline
FUS RO DAH!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Ecumenopolis
Posts: 13,050
why the teams in US are franchises instead of CLUBS?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted: Jan 5, 2006, 4:37 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 42nd Ward
Posts: 6,375
Major League Soccer is very weird....I havent followed it in several years. But it is a collective league with revenue sharing and so on, so the teams in less viable markets are propped up financially. There are also strict salary caps both for individuals and for teams. In fact, I believe players sign a contract with the league, not with the team. At least all this was the case a few years ago. Thus expansion isnt so much a question of how the city can handle it, but how the league collectively can handle it. I do remember the league contracted in size losing 2 teams some years back, so be wary of any expansion.

I found it interesting how U.S. soccer is a collective, command-control system while internationally, football operates in a much more free market, a reversal of how things are for most other things in life.
Reply With Quote
     
     
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:07 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.