Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13
Is that narrow black strip of seats the new Club section? Is that it?
|
You know i thought that too at first but, it looks like they are adding rows right down to the boards, Looks like 8 rows in total. Maybe they were just doing a test fit on the first 4 because structural changes were needed for the rest. They took away the centre tunnel behind the benches and added 1 on each side as you can see in the missing scoreboard pic, I'm assuming they are doing the player walk out view type club like in Edmonton. Which brings me to....dressing room? player facilities? Are they finally catching on that arena condition is key to season ticket holder and player retention?
I think the canucks have just had such a long and easy run on selling tickets they didn't feel the need to upgrade the building. I also read that they have changed their minds on the blue seats and are going black which is a sound decision. Black seats are becoming the standard in arenas which is boring but the baby blue they were testing last season would have looked so cheesy in an already messy looking building. Again I cannot express how happy i am that they scrubbed the blue and green paint off those stairs. Big W! Rogers arena needed a facelift I'm bumbed they aren't doing the seats this year (they may be just waiting for concerts to wrap up) but at least Vancouver will have a decent and modern looking arena for the first time in 15 years.
Quote:
Say what you will about the late Eugene Melnyk, he invested significantly in the arena out in Kanata, even when he was working on a new Downtown arena.
A new ScoreBoard was put in 2013, replacing the one from 1996. In 2014, they added Club Bell seats, which takes up a significant portion of the lower bowl. In 2016, they added the Molson Canadian Fan Deck. I 2018 they added The Loft
|
My Friend, You and I have a different view on the definition of
significant. True North has invested Significant at 80-100M over 12 years into Canada life. The scoreboard at Canadian tire was installed in the 2010-2011 season, It's already coming up on replacement, although still viable the thing is 12-13 years old which in comparison to the technology and size standards of todays NHL, It's the betty white of jumbotrons, Does it make sense to replace it? Not at all, same goes for Calgary which is why they are getting a pass on my verbal thrashing.
As for the rest, Most of that was in an effort to lower seating capacity and drive revenue as Canadian tire centre was essentially endless general seating coupled by an overreaching supply of unoccupied luxury suites, To me that doesn't count and upgrades as its just direct pocket money for the owners. Sure 1500 fans get a better experience for 20k a pop, But the rest of the 19,000 get the shaft.
Changing seats, scoreboards and LED's, upgrading concourses, Sound systems and bowl lighting is a direct loss to the club, they gain almost no net benefit but they do it to give the fans what they deserve.
Winnipeg, Toronto and Edmonton (in my opinion) are the only ones that do this effectively. Montreal has lacked in this department as well. Not nearly to the extent of Vancouver, But lets be real The Habs and leaf fans should be watching hockey in the Cadillac of arenas. Tip top finish in ever corner, The best of the best. These are top 10 earning teams and these barns have paid themselves off many times. A complete renovation at 100M every 10 years is a fraction of the naming rights deals and a hell of a lot better on the wallet than replacement which by 2025 will top a billion even on the frugal side