Sure, and I can show you plenty of data that supports my position. For example :
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education...-survey-finds/
But it doesn't really matter because somebody who doesn't like that will come along and claim the opposite and support it with their own source. Then I'll point out that of course their source would say what it says because it leans the way it does and then they'll counter with the same thing, etc.
But here's the thing: When I see stuff on YouTube, Reddit, or wherever I'm getting my news from, all the radical left wing stuff is coming straight out of universities or from university students. That's not my imagination and I'm one of millions who's also noticed this not-surprising trend. The problem is that when you point that out, you get people telling you that
you're the radical for noticing it. Even though it's easily verifiable. Even though anybody can see it for themselves if they want to. Even though it's
right there for all to see, somehow I'm the one pulling it out of my ass.
Whatever. See, I'm not supposed to point out blatant inconsistencies in leftist talking points and if I do then I must be a Nazi Trump supporter. Or perhaps I'm high on something because how else could I notice glaring inconsistencies that defy common sense? Okay...sure. If you say I'm nuts for pointing this stuff out, sure, then I guess you think I'm nuts for all the difference it makes to me. But, just for the record, I'm neither left nor right. I couldn't care less about anybody's religion or what they've got between their legs. I thought that that was the idea...wasn't it? Ah...it's fine unless somebody points out the obvious bullshit when it comes up. Got it.
Oh, and incidentally, facts don't have any ideological bias. When they do, they're not facts. I think that that is exactly the problem here. Just because it comes from a source you like or has a message you agree with doesn't make it true or factual. Now, when you betray your ideological stance as you just have, why would I take anything you say at face value?