HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2010, 5:51 AM
SkyscrapersOfNewYork's Avatar
SkyscrapersOfNewYork SkyscrapersOfNewYork is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,523
Could Rapture Be Built?

simple question,can the Bioshock city of Rapture actually be built? does engineering support the construction of a completely self sustaining city thousands of feet beneath the surface ancored into the bedrock of the oceans floor?



Quote:
Theories on how they actually built Rapture.

So I always wondered on how Andrew Ryan and his followers actually went about building Rapture and I came up with a couple of theories.

1.) All the buildings in Rapture were just hollowed out husks that were then very carefully sunk into the ocean and by that creating an air pocket inside the building which gave them the room and space in order to start building it from the inside.

2.) The building were assembled on location and then they proceeded to pumped out all the water out while at the same time pump air in in order not to create a vacuum which in turn could cause the building to collapse onto itself from the pressure.
http://irrationalgames.com/community...-built-rapture





http://gameinformer.com/cfs-filesyst...00_rapture.jpg


http://cache-04.gawkerassets.com/ass..._s3_cyc_03.jpg

http://www.gamesetwatch.com/091124-rapture-1.jpg
__________________
New York City,The City That Never Sleeps,The Capitol Of The World,The Big Apple,The Empire City,The Melting Pot,The Metropolis,Gotham

Buildings Over 200 Meters 62 Completed 20 Under Construction 50 Proposed 0 On Hold
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2010, 6:27 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin <------------> Birmingham?
Posts: 57,327
Not if it's under water. I would doubt the extreme pressure would allow for such structures.
__________________
Conform or be cast out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2010, 6:55 AM
Zerton's Avatar
Zerton Zerton is offline
Ω
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,553
The most efficient shape for deep water structures is a sphere, definitely not an art deco skyscraper.
__________________
If all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed, if all records told the same tale, then the lie passed into history and became truth. -Orwell
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2010, 6:57 AM
NYC4Life's Avatar
NYC4Life NYC4Life is offline
The Time To Build Is Now
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 3,004
Not sure how a suboceanic human civilization would coexist with the native aquatic marine wildlife. Would you really want a great white shark or large killer whale lurking outside your window? We can't even keep oil wells from leaking, lol.
__________________
"I want to wake up in the city that never sleeps"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2010, 7:36 AM
JHoward88's Avatar
JHoward88 JHoward88 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 418
I never heard of this fictional city until now, but from the pictures, it is super cool. I'll concur that we don't have the technology necessary to build something like that.

Consider the pipelines that bring water into New York City. That is just a few big pipes running under a river, but the digging of the new tunnel has taken/is taking years of hard work. Imagine the same basic concept, but billions of times more complex. The foundation work alone would be impossible.

You can't just make a skyscraper and then plop it down to the ocean floor like a paperweight; and you couldn't build an underwater skyscraper with submarines any more than you could construct the Empire State Building or Freedom Tower with blimps.

I think that this myth is busted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2010, 7:58 AM
FREKI's Avatar
FREKI FREKI is offline
Kicking it Viking style..
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 7,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHoward88 View Post
I never heard of this fictional city until now, but from the pictures, it is super cool.
It's from a game series..

Bioshock 1: http://www.gametrailers.com/video/re...bioshock/23825

Bioshock 2: http://www.gametrailers.com/video/re...oshock-2/61280

Art Deco wonderland
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHoward88 View Post
You can't just make a skyscraper and then plop it down to the ocean floor like a paperweight; and you couldn't build an underwater skyscraper with submarines any more than you could construct the Empire State Building or Freedom Tower with blimps.

I think that this myth is busted.
Well it's not impossible, just extremely costly ( and time consuming )

If most was pre-fabbed on the surface and combined at location by robots, RC mini subs and deep water divers you could build it..
__________________
FREKI PHOTOTHREADS:
Kingdom of Denmark - Globetrekking
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2010, 8:25 AM
JHoward88's Avatar
JHoward88 JHoward88 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 418
Quote:
Originally Posted by FREKI View Post
Art Deco wonderland
Well it's not impossible, just extremely costly ( and time consuming )

If most was pre-fabbed on the surface and combined at location by robots, RC mini subs and deep water divers you could build it..
Fair enough. I'll concede to the point of agreeing that if building this was humanity's primary (and possibly exclusive) priority, we could probably figure out how to get the job done; but then again, if humanity was on one page enough to actually form a unified space program, we'd probably be building the Enterprise during this century too...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2010, 10:08 AM
Alpha Alpha is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,771
How would you protect the light advertisements against water pressure? As I know it is already quite difficult to lay high voltage cables in very deep water.
The best way to build such a structure would be a dome without large windows.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2011, 4:58 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHoward88 View Post
You can't just make a skyscraper and then plop it down to the ocean floor like a paperweight...
To be fair, that is essentially how off shore oil rigs are built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 9:29 AM
JohnMarko JohnMarko is offline
Architect
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Henderson (Las Vegas)
Posts: 58
Interesting idea.

First: Who says it has to be at the deepest portion underwater? I can see something that is "offshore" or in a few hundred feet to a thousand feet of water - the light in a few hundred feet would be just fine - think tropical waters.

Second: The tropical waters would be "warm" enough. Even Arctic locations would be OK - we already have submarines that survive in extreme temperatures.

Third: Submarines and space stations have already solved the the breathable atmosphere part as well as the pressures involved.

Fourth: While familiar rectangular shaped would probably not be feasable right now due to the pressure at extreme depths, like I said above, if it's not at extreme depths, there should be no problem.

Fifth: Even if at a particular location/depth the surrounding waters were dark, there could always be external lighting to achieve "views".

Last" A few firms are already exploring this idea - have been for a few decades now - all though so far most of them are locating them in tropical waters just off shore in the continental/island "shelves". Very initeresting stuff.

(And FYI - you wouldn't bellieve what major engineering/architectural firms have already developed for Moon and Mars based colonies - that stuff is more than three decaded old now and forever improving - I saw some really neat shit a while back. And these are serious proposals/presentations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2012, 8:41 PM
DecoJim's Avatar
DecoJim DecoJim is offline
Art Deco Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 748
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnMarko View Post
First: Who says it has to be at the deepest portion underwater? I can see something that is "offshore" or in a few hundred feet to a thousand feet of water - the light in a few hundred feet would be just fine - think tropical waters.

Second: The tropical waters would be "warm" enough. Even Arctic locations would be OK - we already have submarines that survive in extreme temperatures.

Third: Submarines and space stations have already solved the the breathable atmosphere part as well as the pressures involved.
Continental shelves can be up to about 500 feet (150 meters). If you sunk a supertall (how tall are the buildings in Bioshock anyway?) skyscraper at the outer edge of a continental shelf, only about 30-50 stories would be underwater.

Operators of military submarines do not have to worry about economics.

Spacecraft and space stations only have to worry about the pressure differential between (0 psi outside) and the internal atmosphere (presumably 14 psi). Only a few special submarines with spherical titanium pressure hulls can go down to the abyssal plains of the ocean floor. Military submarines can presumably dive at least a couple of thousand feet (the maximum depth is probably classified).

If you put the Burj Khalifa in water that was just deep enough for its tip to be at the surface of the water (2719 feet deep), the water pressure at ground floor would be about equivalent to 83 times atmospheric pressure at sea level or 1,220 psi (almost 2/3 ton per square inch)!
__________________
My Detroit and Lego architecture photos: flickr/decojim/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2012, 4:24 AM
Krases's Avatar
Krases Krases is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,226
I still say it should just be freaking built on land.

Also, the floating city of Columbia could have been built on a mountain instead of actually flying (which I am pretty sure is basically impossible). It reminds me of the proposed America Summer Palace for the president that was rejected by Woodrow Wilson for being too over the top balls-crazy.
__________________
There are many things money can buy. But one thing money can't buy is your momma, she's for free and everyone knows it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2012, 3:34 AM
JohnMarko JohnMarko is offline
Architect
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Henderson (Las Vegas)
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by DecoJim View Post
Continental shelves can be up to about 500 feet (150 meters). If you sunk a supertall (how tall are the buildings in Bioshock anyway?) skyscraper at the outer edge of a continental shelf, only about 30-50 stories would be underwater.

Operators of military submarines do not have to worry about economics.

Spacecraft and space stations only have to worry about the pressure differential between (0 psi outside) and the internal atmosphere (presumably 14 psi). Only a few special submarines with spherical titanium pressure hulls can go down to the abyssal plains of the ocean floor. Military submarines can presumably dive at least a couple of thousand feet (the maximum depth is probably classified).

If you put the Burj Khalifa in water that was just deep enough for its tip to be at the surface of the water (2719 feet deep), the water pressure at ground floor would be about equivalent to 83 times atmospheric pressure at sea level or 1,220 psi (almost 2/3 ton per square inch)!
The question was can it be done. It can be done.

Is it cost effective? Is the private space flights for rich "space tourists" cost effective? Some think it is - because it's already happening. And private space launch companies are already being constructed.

Economics, pressure, etc. is not a problem. Only the timing hasn't been right so far.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2010, 7:51 AM
FREKI's Avatar
FREKI FREKI is offline
Kicking it Viking style..
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 7,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyscrapersOfNewYork View Post
simple question,can the Bioshock city of Rapture actually be built? does engineering support the construction of a completely self sustaining city thousands of feet beneath the surface ancored into the bedrock of the oceans floor?
I'm not sure in the time it was set, but nowadays yes, but it will be so extremely costly to do it that way ( as Kevin point out the pressure is extreme, so the structures would need to be massive ) and unlike in the game, it would be very dark down there so all those windows would be wasted and work like mirrors..

And it would be very cold too, so the energy demands would be very high...



have you played the sequel btw
__________________
FREKI PHOTOTHREADS:
Kingdom of Denmark - Globetrekking
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2010, 8:05 AM
SkyscrapersOfNewYork's Avatar
SkyscrapersOfNewYork SkyscrapersOfNewYork is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by FREKI View Post
have you played the sequel btw
yup im playing it right now! (for the 6th or 7th time)
__________________
New York City,The City That Never Sleeps,The Capitol Of The World,The Big Apple,The Empire City,The Melting Pot,The Metropolis,Gotham

Buildings Over 200 Meters 62 Completed 20 Under Construction 50 Proposed 0 On Hold
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2010, 1:16 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,909

991.com
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2010, 2:05 AM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
It could work if you build a gigantic snowglobe around it that would ward off all the water instead, and add some makeshift weather inside at the same time.
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2010, 11:30 AM
LSyd's Avatar
LSyd LSyd is offline
Red October standing by
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Columbia/Sumter, SC
Posts: 16,913
it was built via global warming; the waters rose over it. everyone called him a fool when he built an art deco metropolis on low land; now who's laughing?

-
__________________
"The vapors! The fainting couch! Those heartless elitists are burning down the plantation with their logic and arithmetic!"

-fflint
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2010, 11:11 PM
Krases's Avatar
Krases Krases is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,226
You really can't go wrong with the views. I think it would be cool if an art deco city like rapture was simply built on land.


2kGames
__________________
There are many things money can buy. But one thing money can't buy is your momma, she's for free and everyone knows it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2010, 1:01 AM
SkyscrapersOfNewYork's Avatar
SkyscrapersOfNewYork SkyscrapersOfNewYork is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,523
well what about this "city of Columbia",an american engineering marvel. could it be built

Video Link
__________________
New York City,The City That Never Sleeps,The Capitol Of The World,The Big Apple,The Empire City,The Melting Pot,The Metropolis,Gotham

Buildings Over 200 Meters 62 Completed 20 Under Construction 50 Proposed 0 On Hold
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.