Quote:
Originally Posted by blade_bltz
I don't know, I think places like Newton and Brookline (and Winchester too, for that matter) are more the exception than the rule. The more exurban towns in the Boston area (out towards 495 and beyond) have some egregious hyper-low density sprawl. If there's one thing to be said for California-style autocentric sprawl, at least it's dense.
|
Blade Bltz, I think that may be true out towards 495 and beyond. But, I think Boston is blessed with a multitude of suburbs with a good core. In fact, having a downtown (or center as they are often called) is common in Boston suburbs. Even when I least expect it, I find the suburbs here have a center. For instance, Stoneham, Melrose, Malden, Medford, Peabody, Saugus, Reading, Wakefield, Woburn, Lexington, Waltham, Dedham, Needham, and the list goes on & on. A person casually passing by might assume they are ordinary sprawl suburbs, but closer inspection shows they have cores. When I think of sprawl suburbs, I think of places with no core beyond strip centers or malls. And certainly not built around transit lines, such as many Boston suburbs. Perhaps Burlington? I have yet to find a downtown Burlington. I think the centerless, sprawling, no-sense-of-place suburbs are the exception in Boston. Of course, I am not as familiar with the area further out. Still, when I go further out from where I live, I find Wakefield, Reading, Andover, etc. Sprawling in areas, but always within a short distance of an old fashioned downtown & transit options.