Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_denizen
I find the term rust belt offensive.
|
Yep, me too. It's pejorative and is used to portray a large, diverse region as being entirely run down, old, irrelevant, etc. Is booming Columbus, with its white collar economy and educated population, part of the rust belt simply because it's in Ohio? Is Birmingham, AL not part of the rust belt even though it has a strong legacy of steel and iron production?
I know that population and economic trends aren't caused by terminology, but don't you think the south has benefited from the Sun Belt label, while the midwest has been harmed by the Rust Belt label? What if the south was instead referred to as the Sprawl Belt, or if Bible Belt made a comeback? Should the West Coast be referred to as the Homeless Belt? It seems like it's only ok to use offensive terms when discussing the midwest. Flyover Country is another term that has bothered me for years.