"Filler" buildings

[dleung]

What does the word mean to you? It sure isn't "infill" lol

Originally Posted by GeneralLee(Toronto )

Nice office filler

Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper

there are always those that define a movement and then filler that is inspired by those that define it. I find Mississauga City Hall falls more in the former

Originally Posted by DrNest

As density filler, I don't dislike this one, but it's nothing great to look at.

Originally Posted by caltrane74

It ain't no Telus Sky, but it will make good filler in the Entertainment District.

Originally Posted by yaletown_fella

Pretty decent filler if you ask me.

Originally Posted by O-tacular

Anything that gets built here, let alone a decently tall hotel tower, is a massive improvement. To me it's good filler. It's not a focal point of the skyline...

Originally Posted by Chadillaccc

...I mean I don't think it's great but it's not bad at all. Very good skyline filler

Originally Posted by Beedok

Bland featureless filler makes the landmarks look that much better.

Originally Posted by esquire

You think it's that bad? I don't know, looks like an OK filler building to me. It could be a lot worse than that.

Is it the architectural equivalent of explaining away a terrible meal at a restaurant with "at least it's food", or explaining away catching gonorrhea with "at least it's sex"