It's not a really big trend that the average person might pick up on, but noticeable that proportionally (not the largest raw number) Muslim Americans are not so "bi-coastal" but a bit more concentrated not directly on the two coasts but a bit inland, like the Midwest and Texas, among other places.
It seems like there's some history there, of a great plains/midwest regional concentration. The Detroit area connection is pretty well known, but it's not just there.
The oldest standing mosque in the US is in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and a few of the other old mosques historically have been in the midwest/plains.
"The Al-Sadiq Mosque in Chicago is older by a decade but was converted from an existing building to be used as a mosque. The Mother Mosque of America is also slightly older than the Al-Rashid Mosque in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. The oldest purpose built mosque was torn down in the 1970s near Ross, North Dakota. Recently a smaller mosque was built near that site to commemorate its history."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_Mosque_of_America
The top 2 metro areas with the highest % Muslim are Chicago and Detroit, at 3.7%, with NYC's metro third, at 2.9%.
https://www.citylab.com/equity/2012/...e-cities/4227/
I know there's also a history of homegrown African American Muslim communities, but for the Muslims who arrived from voluntary immigration, be it the Middle East, Asia, Africa, in addition to them, why does it appear that the relative proportion seems a bit higher in the middle of the country?
This contrasts a bit with other non-Christian faiths whose immigration history had more a concentration on the coasts (eg. Jewish on the East coast, Buddhists on the west coast). Why would the Muslim populations be concentrated just a bit more inland than them?