Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister F
The canal already exists - between Port Severn and Trenton. But canals don't count.
Agreed, which is why I thought the "Montreal doesn't count" sentiment was a bit odd. Island living doesn't imply remoteness in and of itself.
I see your point and agree that Ontario is a bit of a cultural and geographical island. But it's not small - you can travel for hours in Ontario east and west of Toronto too. Windsor to Ottawa is as far as the entire length of England.
|
I dunno, by the time you get to Windsor, the orientation is more towards Detroit than Toronto. Sarnia, Chatham, and Windsor seem barely within Toronto's orbit. Heading north, the influence ends in Muskoka, although you could make an argument for Sudbury I suppose. Heading east, it's tricky as it perhaps extends to Kingston, but then things start orientating towards Ottawa, although Ottawa itself is orientated somewhat towards Toronto. Beyond Cornwall, settlements are Montreal-centric. Toronto doesn't really have a bigger hinterland than Detroit or Boston.
Toronto seems like more of a distant overlord. It's important, perhaps influential in certain respects, but in a very impersonal, distant manner beyond the Greater Golden Horseshoe and surroundings. Halifax, Montreal, Winnipeg, Edmonton, Vancouver, none of these places really feel Toronto-orientated. It's more of a distant, important city that has marginal influence. It's no London, Paris, or Moscow.
Perhaps those places are outliers though, especially considering Canada is such a vast nation. New York and Los Angeles have greater spheres than Toronto, sure, but decisions made on Wilshire Blvd have a marginal influence on the folks in Little Rock. Germany, Italy, Spain, China, India, Australia, Japan, and Vietnam are all polycentric as well.