Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin
It's not ideal, for sure; but even less ideal would be for renters to have no security on their home and have to contend with the constant possibility of eviction or homelessness should they face a sudden rent increase above than they can afford or would be willing to pay.
We make many of these sorts of compromises as part of living in a civilized society, and in this case, it's been decided that the rights of the incumbent tenant to be secure in their apartment trump the rights of the prospective tenant to pay a lesser rent.
|
There’s always a cheaper apartment to rent. Why does anyone “deserve” to stay somewhere like Greenwich Village, when ostensibly more successful people with better jobs and higher incomes have to live in some neighborhood in Queens or Jersey because they didn’t win a lottery?
Threaded Mode