HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    45 Lansing in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • San Francisco Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
San Francisco Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #261  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2012, 6:38 PM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElDuderino View Post
Again, nothing special, but its a welcome addition, and Rincon Hill is going to look much better in a couple years.
I think this rendering makes it look like an unworthy addition, badly in need of a redesign. This tower could block views of the much improved 375 Fremont too.
     
     
  #262  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2012, 6:50 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
news?

socketsite tells us what minesweeper already did two months ago...
     
     
  #263  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2012, 3:22 AM
minesweeper minesweeper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 613
Here's an updated rendering (left image) I found on crescentheights.com.

It looks less yellow than the original rendering, and the podium looks a bit different.



Considering they have all permits in hand, it would be great if they broke ground soon.
     
     
  #264  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2012, 5:44 AM
ltsmotorsport's Avatar
ltsmotorsport ltsmotorsport is offline
Here we stAy
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Parkway Pauper
Posts: 8,064
New rendering looks good. Hope they start moving on this one soon.
__________________
Riding out the crazy train
     
     
  #265  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2013, 8:57 AM
1977's Avatar
1977 1977 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 996
There are some renderings of the base of the tower I hadn't seen before over at HKS.
     
     
  #266  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2013, 6:28 AM
minesweeper minesweeper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 613
Not sure how close we are to groundbreaking, but the developer filed for permits for excavation and shoring in February. They haven't actually been issued yet by the Planning Dept though. The construction company listed is the Build Group.

I've mirrored those renderings of the tower base, in case the website takes them down:



     
     
  #267  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2013, 5:27 PM
sahran sahran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 15
Looks like 45 Lansing has broken ground!

http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2...ncon_hill.html
     
     
  #268  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2013, 2:11 AM
mt_climber13 mt_climber13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by minesweeper View Post
Not sure how close we are to groundbreaking, but the developer filed for permits for excavation and shoring in February. They haven't actually been issued yet by the Planning Dept though. The construction company listed is the Build Group.

I've mirrored those renderings of the tower base, in case the website takes them down:



What a depressing street experience on Harrison-
how does the city expect to create a livable, walkable neighborhood when these towers have no retail and blank walls with large garage door openings jutting out? Lots of lost opportunity.
     
     
  #269  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2013, 3:46 AM
mthd mthd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakamesalad View Post
What a depressing street experience on Harrison-
how does the city expect to create a livable, walkable neighborhood when these towers have no retail and blank walls with large garage door openings jutting out? Lots of lost opportunity.
these small lots are a challenge. buildings need entrances for loading and parking, access to utilities, exhaust and intake air, etc. while it's theoretically possible to reduce all of this to a single garage door, it's astronomically expensive and wasteful of space on every floor of the building. i don't think they've done a great job here, but the strategy is obviously to focus pedestrian activity on folsom (which is what the plan says to do!).
     
     
  #270  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2013, 6:34 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
this is what the site looked like early this evening:



agree with mthd in that I'm not as concerned on this stretch of Harrison about the pedestrian experience. I might be wrong, but my guess is that most casual walkers are not going to make the effort to huff up and down the hill.
     
     
  #271  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2013, 8:16 PM
minesweeper minesweeper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 613
Nice to see this one finally breaking ground. I was browsing through the planning PDF and noticed that it provides an actual structural height for the tower, which is 430 feet.

It's 400 feet to the roof line, and an additional 30 feet of mechanical screening (the numbers are on the third-to-last page of the PDF). I don't know anyone who can change the thread title will see this comment, but there you go.

It looks like they put the loading dock and garage entrance on Harrison so that the streetscape on Lansing will be better. The developers are planning on transforming that whole street:

     
     
  #272  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2013, 6:53 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
thanks for that, minesweeper. nice to see some attention being paid to that mini-neighborhood in there.

here is a closer-up view of the site from this afternoon:

     
     
  #273  
Old Posted May 4, 2013, 2:57 PM
simms3_redux's Avatar
simms3_redux simms3_redux is offline
She needs her space
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,454
May 3...construction crews were hard work.

     
     
  #274  
Old Posted May 28, 2013, 6:54 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
still clearing the site, it looks like, altho if anything, it looks more cluttered now than it did a month or two ago

     
     
  #275  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2013, 2:37 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
they've gotten incredibly deep in a short amount of time:

     
     
  #276  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2013, 2:44 AM
simms3_redux's Avatar
simms3_redux simms3_redux is offline
She needs her space
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,454
That's basically still where 350 Mission is at. I'm very glad to see this progress - thought about walking over this weekend but didn't. Thanks!

I really think this go in the Highrise Construction thread at this point. It's happening...foundation work is only a couple more weeks away, a month at the most.
     
     
  #277  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2013, 10:43 PM
simms3_redux's Avatar
simms3_redux simms3_redux is offline
She needs her space
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,454


No word on financing yet (unlike Lumina, which is much further behind and has already been publicly issued one of the largest construction loans of the year). I still think this should be moved to official construction as the sponsor is Crescent Heights (NEMA and other devs in city wrapping up).
     
     
  #278  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2013, 11:22 PM
rocketman_95046's Avatar
rocketman_95046 rocketman_95046 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SD/SJ, CA, USA
Posts: 1,879
^simms, thanks for the updates.

Fyi the mods won't move it to construction until something structural is put in place.

i.e pilings, foundation etc. excavating is not considered construction. That is the rule.
__________________
1,000 posts and still going...
     
     
  #279  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2013, 4:05 AM
simms3_redux's Avatar
simms3_redux simms3_redux is offline
She needs her space
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,454
From: http://www.socketsite.com/
Quote:
In the words of a camera toting tipster, "Just like in Mike Mulligan and His Steam Shovel, they've dug deep enough over at 45 Lansing that they'll now need a crane to remove the backhoes" from the basement of the 39-story Rincon Hill condo tower to rise.
Hopefully that means tower crane coming soon, and a move of this project over to Highrise Construction (no word so far as I know on financing, unlike at Tishman's project - THAT to me is always a sure sign a development deal is definitely happening).
     
     
  #280  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2013, 3:08 PM
simms3_redux's Avatar
simms3_redux simms3_redux is offline
She needs her space
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by timbad View Post
they've gotten incredibly deep in a short amount of time:
Understatement of the year - check this out! (I guess all for the mechanical garage)





I was actually kind of shocked - I thought after my last visit the hole was deep and they would flatten out and prepare for foundation and crane installation, but they kept digging! It's almost as deep as the 6-7 floor building behind it is tall!
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:16 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.