HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2019, 11:26 PM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
¥ ¥ ¥
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,915
Quote:
Originally Posted by rousseau View Post
Such a wonderful little commercial section that you'd never know was there. I'll never forget when I first discovered Baldwin Street while walking north from the AGO. I remember thinking: What is this? How can this be?

One of the most satisfying urban pleasures to me is getting a bit lost and discovering a charming little enclave that you had no idea existed. Toronto has these hidden gems all over the place. It's what makes it a great city.

Toronto's backstreet commercial districts are one of my favourite things about the city - think Kensington, Yorkville, Baldwin Village, Mirvish Village (RIP), etc. They're intimate and relaxing in a way that the typical high street thoroughfares are not, and they just make for fun places to discover.

I found Kensington in much the same way - I quite literally had no idea of its existence until I happened to follow some interesting-looking streets meandering away from Chinatown as a kid.

Self-indulgent nostalgia time: It was the summer of 2002 and I was 11. To keep me occupied over summer vacation, my parents enrolled me in a computer programming class downtown. Every day I'd take the subway down to it, but the real fun started after class when I was on my own and free to go wherever I wanted.

From a young age, I had always been happy to tag along with my parents or siblings downtown to go to the museum, restaurants, shows, or visit relatives; and I had long since grown to love those areas I knew well, like Chinatown, St Lawrence, or the Annex - but ultimately I was always just a kid following someone else. This was my first real chance to explore the city on my own, and with my newfound independence I could finally see what lay down all those enticing-looking streets.

On one of my walks through Chinatown, I for whatever reason decided to try walking further west along Dundas. But as the activity there started to peter out after a couple blocks, I turned right to loop back around and ended up being greeted with this whole new fantastic, weird neighbourhood to explore. And I've loved it ever since that day.
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2019, 11:37 PM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
¥ ¥ ¥
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 9,915
While we're on the topic of back street commercial areas, Yorkville is a good neighbouhood. Yeah it's ostentatious and douchey, but its urbanity is fantastic: small, narrow buildings with an eclectic mix of futuristic 60s modernism, PoMo, Victorians, and high-end modern boutiques with multiple levels of retail on narrow, well-appointed streets; bisected by commercialized pedestrian lanes, and surrounded by high-rises (it's kinda like the upside down world version of Kensington).

Not the main intersection, but this is probably my favourite section: https://goo.gl/maps/yuA5v5ouHAhw7G1a6

If I let my imagination wander a little bit, Yorkville actually almost reminds me of parts of Tokyo. The scale is similar and they've both got that vaguely retro modern look: https://goo.gl/maps/scH2UzwanrPDsGjp7
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2019, 2:50 PM
paulwillyjean paulwillyjean is offline
Urbaniste amateur
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Montréal
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin View Post
While we're on the topic of back street commercial areas, Yorkville is a good neighbouhood. Yeah it's ostentatious and douchey, but its urbanity is fantastic: small, narrow buildings with an eclectic mix of futuristic 60s modernism, PoMo, Victorians, and high-end modern boutiques with multiple levels of retail on narrow, well-appointed streets; bisected by commercialized pedestrian lanes, and surrounded by high-rises (it's kinda like the upside down world version of Kensington).

Not the main intersection, but this is probably my favourite section: https://goo.gl/maps/yuA5v5ouHAhw7G1a6

If I let my imagination wander a little bit, Yorkville actually almost reminds me of parts of Tokyo. The scale is similar and they've both got that vaguely retro modern look: https://goo.gl/maps/scH2UzwanrPDsGjp7
That Toronto intersection made me think of this one in Montreal. https://goo.gl/maps/VXY2T1Jf9bZCqKMX9
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2019, 8:10 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian View Post
Portage and Main is one of the worst intersections in the country simply because they banned pedestrians from it.
clearly you don't appreciate the X-factor
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2019, 8:19 PM
samne's Avatar
samne samne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastend
Posts: 3,729
Love the old ethnic hoods still holding on. A bunch left in the west end.

Dundas and Roncesvailles (where the Polish and Portuguese meet) is still kinda stuck in time...

https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.65379...7i13312!8i6656
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2019, 8:42 PM
rousseau's Avatar
rousseau rousseau is offline
Registered Drug User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 8,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by samne View Post
Love the old ethnic hoods still holding on. A bunch left in the west end.

Dundas and Roncesvailles (where the Polish and Portuguese meet) is still kinda stuck in time...

https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.65379...7i13312!8i6656
Every time I drive through there I'm struck by how bleak a crossroads it is. I guess that's because it's so totally devoted to vehicular traffic (which I contribute to when I drive through--hypocrite alert).

Seems like it could be so much nicer, but I'm not sure exactly how you'd go about doing it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2019, 8:45 PM
rousseau's Avatar
rousseau rousseau is offline
Registered Drug User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 8,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
no intersection has more X-factor than Portage and Main.

Would be a lot better if the street-facing facade of the Richardson Building followed the contours of the corner it sits on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2019, 9:49 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,458
^ that's the least of its problems....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2019, 10:38 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 9,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by rousseau View Post
Every time I drive through there I'm struck by how bleak a crossroads it is. I guess that's because it's so totally devoted to vehicular traffic (which I contribute to when I drive through--hypocrite alert).

Seems like it could be so much nicer, but I'm not sure exactly how you'd go about doing it.
The main thing would be increased vegetation in the form of planters and window boxes along with some street furniture such as benches. Buildings could also use 1-2 more stories tho.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2019, 11:03 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 34,724
Obviously, we have no excessively big, North American-style, urban intersections. But we have two cute things...

The first is simply a mess of streets in the core. Wherever horses walked, that's where we put a road. But even in our inter-war suburbs, the intersections are designed to be driven on the left. So now that we drive on the right, you end up with near-360-degree left-hand turns. Always fun.



We also have a lot of used-to-be-roundabouts that were North American-ized and turned into giant asphalt fields, or dead-end streets.



Check out that crosswalk lol This used to be two roundabouts side-by-side. Now it's this mess. But the city is changing it, cutting the road down to just one lane and filling in the extra asphalt with parkland.



The two best intersections in the city, though, are Rawlin's Cross (this is one giant roundabout. You can't actually drive through the middle that cuts straight across):



And the intersection of George Street, Water Street, and Beck's Cove (those aren't surface parking lots, but rooftop ones):

__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2019, 1:15 AM
rousseau's Avatar
rousseau rousseau is offline
Registered Drug User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 8,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nouvellecosse View Post
Buildings could also use 1-2 more stories tho.
You're right, there's a disconnect when buildings are short enough to suggest intimacy but the roadway in front of them is big and broad enough to march Roman legions through. If that intersection had Parisian height and larger sidewalks the scale would feel "right."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2019, 2:05 AM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is online now
♒︎ Empirically Canadian
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 11,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by SignalHillHiker View Post
Obviously, we have no excessively big, North American-style, urban intersections. But we have two cute things...

The first is simply a mess of streets in the core. Wherever horses walked, that's where we put a road. But even in our inter-war suburbs, the intersections are designed to be driven on the left. So now that we drive on the right, you end up with near-360-degree left-hand turns. Always fun.

...
But you would still have the 360° turns even if driving on the left, (i.e. westbound on Craigmillar turning right on to Cornwall, and westbound on Cornwall turning left on to Craigmillar).

St. John's weird intersections are the result of an unplanned network of rural roads from the 1700s which became more urban over time coupled with uneven topography. Many of the streets followed the topography. Most populated places in North America had some planning, and more even topography.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2019, 6:18 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 34,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Architype View Post
But you would still have the 360° turns even if driving on the left, (i.e. westbound on Craigmillar turning right on to Cornwall, and westbound on Cornwall turning left on to Craigmillar).

St. John's weird intersections are the result of an unplanned network of rural roads from the 1700s which became more urban over time coupled with uneven topography. Many of the streets followed the topography. Most populated places in North America had some planning, and more even topography.
True but... I've no way to prove this but I promise you the most commonly-used routes used to be ones where you didn't have to make that near-360 turn. They were the exception for only a few travellers. Now, most people driving that way make that turn.

It's a bit like the intersection in front of Corpus Christi Church:



When you are driving from left to right in that photo, toward downtown, it feels like a blind turn. If we were still driving on the left, that wouldn't matter.

When you're going the other way, driving on the left, you can see more so you don't get that problem. And, driving on the right, most traffic still turns up to take Columbus Drive. So it just feels like a poorly-designed intersection. Whereas, driving on the other side, it's perfectly designed for traffic flow and view planes.

It's one of those things that seems as though it's completely even. If you drive on the left, this lane has it worst... if you switch it, this other lane has it worst. But it's not an even split like that. There are little things that add up that make it significantly worse driving on the right. And they're impossible to prove or even explain really. But just... spend a few days driving around, and they make perfect sense.

And this isn't my nationalism showing. We were switching to right-hand driving with or without Canada. It's not like I'm saying "this is something Canada did to us" lol. It's just a change that had some negative impacts in the portions of the city existing at the time.
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:32 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.